×

On the application of Markov chain Monte Carlo methods to genetic analyses on complex pedigrees. (English) Zbl 1107.92305

Summary: Markov chain Monte Carlo methods are frequently used in the analyses of genetic data on pedigrees for the estimation of probabilities and likelihoods which cannot be calculated by existing exact methods. In the case of discrete data, the underlying Markov chain may be reducible and care must be taken to ensure that reliable estimates are obtained. Potential reducibility thus has implications for the analysis of the mixed inheritance model, for example, where genetic variation is assumed to be due to one single locus of large effect and many loci each with a small effect. Similarly, reducibility arises in the detection of quantitative trait loci from incomplete discrete marker data. This paper aims to describe the estimation problem in terms of simple discrete genetic models and the single-site Gibbs sampler. Reducibility of the Gibbs sampler is discussed and some current methods for circumventing the problem outlined.

MSC:

92D10 Genetics and epigenetics
65C40 Numerical analysis or methods applied to Markov chains
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(71)92303-8 · doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(71)92303-8
[2] Besag J., Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 48 pp 259– (1986)
[3] Besag J., Journal of Applied Statistics 16 (3) pp 395– (1989)
[4] DOI: 10.1093/imammb/11.2.95 · doi:10.1093/imammb/11.2.95
[5] DOI: 10.2307/1426718 · Zbl 0431.92019 · doi:10.2307/1426718
[6] DOI: 10.2307/2291683 · Zbl 0869.62066 · doi:10.2307/2291683
[7] Cox D. R., Stochastic Processes (1965)
[8] Edwards A. W. F., Heredity 23 pp 628– (1968)
[9] Edwards A. W. F., Human Heredity 42 pp 242– (1992)
[10] Elston R. C., Human Heredity 21 pp 523– (1971)
[11] German S., IEEE Tranactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 45 pp 721– (1984) · Zbl 0573.62030 · doi:10.1109/TPAMI.1984.4767596
[12] C. J. Geyer (1991 ). Markov chain Monte Carlo maximum likelihood . InComputer Science and Statistics: Proceedings of the 23rd Symposium on the Interface, pp.156 -163 .
[13] DOI: 10.2307/2291325 · Zbl 0850.62834 · doi:10.2307/2291325
[14] Gilberg A., Polar Eskimo Genealogy, Vol. 203, Nr. 4 of Meddelelser om Gronland (1978)
[15] Gilks W. R., Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 55 pp 39– (1993)
[16] Gilks W. R., Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice (1995)
[17] Goddard K., American Journal of Human Genetics 58 pp 1286– (1996)
[18] DOI: 10.2307/2337340 · doi:10.2307/2337340
[19] J. M. Hammersley, and P. Clifford (1971 ). Markov fiels on finite graphs and lattces. Unpublshed.
[20] DOI: 10.1093/biomet/57.1.97 · Zbl 0219.65008 · doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97
[21] Heath S. C., American Journal of Human Genetics 61 pp 748– (1997)
[22] Hoeschele I., Genetics 147 pp 1445– (1997)
[23] M. A. Hurn, C. S. Jensen, and N. A. Sheehan (1999 ). An irreducible random family-size sampler for genotypes on pedigrees. In Preparation.
[24] DOI: 10.1016/S0167-7152(98)90150-X · Zbl 0934.65002 · doi:10.1016/S0167-7152(98)90150-X
[25] DOI: 10.1007/BF00223932 · doi:10.1007/BF00223932
[26] Jensen C. S., Mathematical Genetics pp 84– (1996)
[27] DOI: 10.2307/3109752 · Zbl 1058.62617 · doi:10.2307/3109752
[28] DOI: 10.1006/ijhc.1995.1029 · doi:10.1006/ijhc.1995.1029
[29] Jensen F. V., An introduction to Bayesian networks (1996)
[30] A. Kong, M. Irwin, N. Cox, and M. Frigge (1992 ). Multiloci problems and the method of sequential imputation, Technical Report 351. Chicago, IL 60637, USA: University of Chicago, Department of Statistics.
[31] Lange K., Human Heredity 25 pp 95– (1975)
[32] Lange K., American Journal of Human Genetics 45 pp 959– (1989)
[33] Lauritzen S. L., Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 50 pp 157– (1988)
[34] C. M. Lewis (1991 ). Theoretical and applied problems in pedigree analysis. University of Sheffield : PhD. thesis .
[35] DOI: 10.2307/2533337 · Zbl 0825.92091 · doi:10.2307/2533337
[36] DOI: 10.2307/2532855 · Zbl 0867.62081 · doi:10.2307/2532855
[37] DOI: 10.1093/imammb/10.1.1 · doi:10.1093/imammb/10.1.1
[38] Lin S., Annals of Human Genetics 58 pp 343– (1994)
[39] Lin S., American Journal of Human Genetics 54 pp 695– (1994)
[40] Lund M. S., Genetics, Selection, Evolution 31 pp 3– (1999)
[41] DOI: 10.1002/zoo.1430050209 · doi:10.1002/zoo.1430050209
[42] DOI: 10.1063/1.1699114 · doi:10.1063/1.1699114
[43] Morgan K., Population structure of a religious isolate: the Dariusleut Hutterites of Alberta, Vol. 2 of Current developments in Anthropological Genetics (1982)
[44] DOI: 10.1073/pnas.86.11.4175 · Zbl 0669.92007 · doi:10.1073/pnas.86.11.4175
[45] Ploughman L. M., American Journal of Human Genetics 44 pp 543– (1989)
[46] DOI: 10.1093/imammb/9.1.1 · doi:10.1093/imammb/9.1.1
[47] DOI: 10.2307/2532611 · Zbl 0778.92013 · doi:10.2307/2532611
[48] N. A. Sheehan (1989 ). Image processing procedures applied to the estimation of genotypes. Technical Report 176, Department of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
[49] N. A. Sheehan (1990 ). Genetic restoration on complex pedigrees. University of Washington : PhD thesis .
[50] Sobel E., American Journal of Human Genetics 58 pp 1323– (1996)
[51] D. Sorensen (1996 ). Gibbs sampling in quantitative genetics. Technical Report 82, Danish Institute of Animal Sciences, Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, P. O. Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark.
[52] Sorensen D. A., Genetics, Selection, Evolution 27 pp 229– (1995)
[53] A. Thomas (1985 ). Data structures, methods of approximation and optimal computation for pedigree analysis. Cambridge University : PhD thesis .
[54] DOI: 10.1093/imammb/3.3.157 · doi:10.1093/imammb/3.3.157
[55] DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780050402 · doi:10.1002/sim.4780050402
[56] Thompson E. A., Pedigree Analysis in Human Genetics (1986)
[57] Thompson E. A., Statistical Science 9 (3) pp 355– (1994)
[58] DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1994.0073 · doi:10.1098/rstb.1994.0073
[59] DOI: 10.1093/imammb/8.3.149 · doi:10.1093/imammb/8.3.149
[60] DOI: 10.1007/BF00223463 · doi:10.1007/BF00223463
[61] Wright S., J. Agric. Res. 31 pp 377– (1925)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.