×

\(H_\infty\) control of parameter-dependent state-delayed systems using polynomial parameter-dependent quadratic functions. (English) Zbl 1083.93012

The authors provide a systematic way for the use of polynomial parameter-dependent Lyapunov functions in the robust disturbance attenuation and the robust asymptotic stability problems of finite-dimensional LTIPD systems with constant time-delay parameters in the state. The system under consideration is of the form: \[ \begin{aligned} \dot x(t)&= A_1(\rho)x(t)+A_2(\rho)x(t-h)+B_u u(t)+B_w w(t),\\ x(t)&=\varphi(t), \qquad t\in[-h,0],\\ z(t)&= C_1x(t)+C_2u(t), \end{aligned} \] where \(C_1^TC_2=0\), \(h\) is the constant time-delay parameter, \(\varphi(t)\) is the continuous vector valued initial function, \(z(t)\) is the controlled output, \(x(t), u(t)\) and \(w(t)\) are the state vector, the control input and the disturbance vector, respectively. The affine parameter dependence of the system matrices means that \[ A_1(\rho)=A_0+\rho_1A_1+\rho_2A_2+\dots+\rho_mA_m \]
\[ A_2(\rho)=A_{d0}+\rho_1A_{d1}+\rho_2A_{d2}+\dots+\rho_mA_{dm}. \] Sufficient conditions of increasing precision for the existence of polynomial parameter-dependent quadratic Lyapunov functions are given using LMI formulations. It is shown that the state feedback control can be determined to guarantee the stability of the closed -loop system independently of the time-delay. Some simulation results show that the obtained control law can achieve robust stability and disturbance attenuation, simultaneously.

MSC:

93B36 \(H^\infty\)-control
93C23 Control/observation systems governed by functional-differential equations
15A39 Linear inequalities of matrices
93D09 Robust stability
93D30 Lyapunov and storage functions
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Bliman PA, Proceding of the 40th IEEE CDC. pp pp. 1438–1443– (2001)
[2] Bliman PA, Proceedings of the 42nd IEEE CDC. pp pp. 6103–6108– (2003)
[3] DOI: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2003.08.001 · Zbl 1157.93360 · doi:10.1016/j.sysconle.2003.08.001
[4] DOI: 10.1137/S0363012901398691 · Zbl 1069.93027 · doi:10.1137/S0363012901398691
[5] DOI: 10.1109/9.508913 · Zbl 0857.93088 · doi:10.1109/9.508913
[6] DOI: 10.1109/9.486646 · Zbl 0854.93113 · doi:10.1109/9.486646
[7] Gahinet P, Natik, MA: The MATH Works Inc. (1995)
[8] Hara S, Proceedings of the 16th International symposium on Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems, (MTNS2004) (2004)
[9] Lu B, Proceedings of the ACC pp pp. 3875–3880– (2004)
[10] Scherer CW, Proceedings 16th International symposium on Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems, (MTNS2004) (2004)
[11] Scherer CW, Proceedings of the 16th International symposium on Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems, (MTNS2004) (2004)
[12] DOI: 10.1016/0005-1098(91)90116-J · Zbl 0754.93022 · doi:10.1016/0005-1098(91)90116-J
[13] Verdult V ”Nonlinear system identification: A state-space approach” Ph. D. Thesis. University of Twente, also available in the web address:http://doc.utwente.nl/fid/1467 2002
[14] Wang LY, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 41 pp pp. 886–888– (1996)
[15] Zhang X, 42nd IEEE Proceedings of the CDC 5 (2003)
[16] DOI: 10.1016/0167-6911(88)90034-5 · Zbl 0634.93066 · doi:10.1016/0167-6911(88)90034-5
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.