×

Numerical solution of the nonlinear Helmholtz equation using nonorthogonal expansions. (English) Zbl 1076.78008

The paper aims to develop an advanced simulation algorithm for nonlinear wave transmission within the framework of a model based on the nonlinear Helmholtz (NLH) equation for a complex amplitude \(E(z,x,y)\), \[ (\partial^2_{zz}+\Delta_{\perp})E + k_0^2(1 + \varepsilon | E| ^{2\sigma})E=0, \] where \(\Delta_{\perp} = \partial_{xx}^2 + \partial_{yy}^2\) is the transverse diffraction operator, while the longitudinal coordinate \(z\) plays the role of the evolutional variable (the wave propagation is considered in the spatial domain, without any time dependence). The difference from the usually employed simplified propagation equation (in the spatial domain) of the nonlinear Schrödinger type is that the NLH equation makes it possible to explicitly consider the effect of nonlinear backscattering on nonuniformities of the field density, \(| E| ^2\), and does not rely upon the paraxial approximation (weak diffraction for very broad beams). The equation is to be solved within a finite interval of \(z\), which corresponds to the physically meaningful problem of the transmission in a finite-thickness slab. The physically relevant value of the nonlinear index is \(\sigma =1\), which corresponds to the Kerr effect in optics. The paper treats this case, as well as another one, with \(\sigma=2\) (quintic nonlinearity), with one transverse coordinate \(x\), rather than \(x\) and \(y\) (i.e., \(\Delta_{\perp}=\partial^2_x\)). The latter case, although not directly relevant to nonlinear optics, is interesting, as it corresponds to the critical situation (in the sense of the possibility of weak collapse) in the one-dimensional nonlinear-propagation problem. The former case relates to the critical situation in the propagation setting with two transverse dimensions. In simulations of the NLH equation, a crucially important role is played by lateral boundary conditions set at fixed values of \(x\), a significant issue being correct handling of outcoming and incoming waves (which must avoid unphysical reflections).
In a previous paper of the same authors [J. Comput. Phys. 171, 632–677 (2001; Zbl 0991.78016)], a method of artificial boundary conditions was developed for this purpose. In that paper, zero Dirichlet conditions were fixed at the artificial boundaries. In the present paper, a major improvement is replacement of the latter conditions by the Sommerfeld radiation conditions. The implementation of the latter type of the boundary conditions amounts to computation of eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a non-Hermitian matrix. Accordingly, the separation of variables, which is a necessary ingredient of the numerical integration code, must be performed in terms of an expansion over a basis of non-orthogonal eigenvectors. The algorithm is applied to the simulations of both critical field configurations (ones at the collapse threshold) and propagation of subcritical pulses (solitons).

MSC:

78A60 Lasers, masers, optical bistability, nonlinear optics
35J05 Laplace operator, Helmholtz equation (reduced wave equation), Poisson equation
35J65 Nonlinear boundary value problems for linear elliptic equations
65N06 Finite difference methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs

Citations:

Zbl 0991.78016

Software:

OASES
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Boyd, R., Nonlinear optics (2003), Academic Press: Academic Press Boston
[2] Sulem, C.; Sulem, P. L., The nonlinear Schrödinger equation (1999), Springer: Springer New York · Zbl 0867.35094
[3] Fibich, G.; Papanicolaou, G. C., Self-focusing in the perturbed and unperturbed nonlinear Schrödinger equation in critical dimension, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 60, 183-240 (1999) · Zbl 1026.78013
[4] Wöste, L.; Wedekind, C.; Wille, H.; Rairoux, P.; Stein, B.; Nikolov, S.; Werner, C.; Niedermeier, S.; Ronnenberger, F.; Schillinger, H.; Sauerbrey, R., Femtosecond atmospheric lamp, Laser und Optoelektronik, 29, 51-53 (1997)
[5] Tsynkov, S. V., Numerical solution of problems on unbounded domains. A review, Appl. Numer. Math., 27, 465-532 (1998) · Zbl 0939.76077
[6] Fibich, G.; Tsynkov, S. V., High-order two-way artificial boundary conditions for nonlinear wave propagation with backscattering, J. Comput. Phys., 171, 632-677 (2001) · Zbl 0991.78016
[7] Fibich, G.; Ilan, B.; Tsynkov, S. V., Computation of nonlinear backscattering using a high-order numerical method, J. Sci. Comput., 17, 1-4, 351-364 (2002) · Zbl 1005.78010
[8] Fibich, G.; Ilan, B.; Tsynkov, S. V., Backscattering and nonparaxiality arrest collapse of damped linear waves, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 63, 5, 1718-1736 (2003) · Zbl 1032.65091
[9] Tsynkov, S. V., External boundary conditions for three-dimensional problems of computational aerodynamics, SIAM J. Sci. Comp., 21, 166-206 (1999) · Zbl 0948.65088
[10] Fibich, G.; Ilan, B., Vectorial and random effects in self-focusing and in multiple filamentation, Physica D, 157, 112-146 (2001) · Zbl 0983.35131
[11] Weinstein, M. I., Nonlinear Schrödinger equations and sharp interpolation estimates, Comm. Math. Phys., 87, 567-576 (1983) · Zbl 0527.35023
[12] Akhmediev, N.; Soto-Crespo, J. M., Generation of a train of three-dimensional optical solitons in a self-focusing medium, Phys. Rev. A, 47, 1358-1364 (1993)
[13] Akhmediev, N.; Ankiewicz, A.; Soto-Crespo, J. M., Does the nonlinear Schrödinger equation correctly describe beam propagation?, Opt. Lett., 18, 411-413 (1993)
[14] Feit, M. D.; Fleck, J. A., Beam nonparaxiality, filament formation, and beam breakup in the self-focusing of optical beams, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 5, 633-640 (1988)
[15] Fibich, G., Small beam nonparaxiality arrests self-focusing of optical beams, Phys. Rev. Lett., 76, 4356-4359 (1996)
[16] M. Sever, An existence theorem for some semilinear elliptic systems, J. Differential Eqs., submitted for publication.; M. Sever, An existence theorem for some semilinear elliptic systems, J. Differential Eqs., submitted for publication. · Zbl 1179.35115
[17] Cohen, O.; Uzdin, R.; Carmon, T.; Fleischer, J.; Segev, M.; Odoulov, S., Collisions between optical spatial solitons propagating in opposite directions, Phys. Rev. Lett., 89, 133901 (2002)
[18] Agranovich, M. S.; Katsenelenbaum, B. Z.; Sivov, A. N.; Voitovich, N. N., Generalized method of eigenoscillations in diffraction theory (1999), WILEY-VCH Verlag Berlin GmbH: WILEY-VCH Verlag Berlin GmbH Berlin, translated from the Russian manuscript by Vladimir Nazaikinskii · Zbl 0929.65097
[19] Ching, E. S.C.; Leung, P. T.; van der Brink, A. M.; Suen, W. M.; Tong, S. S.; Young, K., Quasi-normal mode expansion for waves in open systems, Rev. Modern Phys., 70, 4, 1545-1554 (1998)
[20] Agranovich, M. S., Elliptic boundary problems, (Partial differential equations, IX. Partial differential equations, IX, Encyclopaedia of mathematical science, vol. 79 (1997), Springer: Springer Berlin), 1-144, 275-281, translated from the Russian by the author · Zbl 0880.35001
[21] Ryaben’kii, V. S., Necessary and sufficient conditions for good definition of boundary value problems for systems of ordinary difference equations, U.S.S.R. Comput. Math. Math. Phys., 4, 43-61 (1964) · Zbl 0148.32603
[22] Godunov, S. K.; Ryaben’kii, V. S., Difference schemes: an introduction to underlying theory (1987), North-Holland: North-Holland New York, Amsterdam · Zbl 0614.65096
[23] Rossi, T.; Toivanen, J., A nonstandard cyclic reduction method, its variants and stability, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., 20, 3, 628-645 (1999), (electronic) · Zbl 0929.65011
[24] Courant, R.; Hilbert, D., Methods of mathematical physics, vol. II (1962), Wiley: Wiley New York · Zbl 0729.00007
[25] Bayliss, A.; Turkel, E., Radiation boundary conditions for wave-like equations, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 33, 6, 707-725 (1980) · Zbl 0438.35043
[26] Bayliss, A.; Turkel, E., Outflow boundary conditions for fluid dynamics, SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Comput., 3, 2, 250-259 (1982) · Zbl 0509.76035
[27] Bayliss, A.; Turkel, E., Far field boundary conditions for compressible flows, J. Comput. Phys., 48, 2, 182-199 (1982) · Zbl 0494.76072
[28] Higdon, R. L., Radiation boundary conditions for dispersive waves, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 31, 1, 64-100 (1994) · Zbl 0798.65113
[29] Higdon, R. L., Absorbing boundary conditions for difference approximations to the multidimensional wave equation, Math. Comp., 47, 176, 437-459 (1986) · Zbl 0609.35052
[30] Higdon, R. L., Absorbing boundary conditions for acoustic and elastic waves in stratified media, J. Comput. Phys., 101, 2, 386-418 (1992) · Zbl 0800.76402
[31] Higdon, R. L., Absorbing boundary conditions for dispersive waves, (Geers, T. L., IUTAM symposium on computational methods for unbounded domains (Boulder, CO, 1997). IUTAM symposium on computational methods for unbounded domains (Boulder, CO, 1997), Fluid mechanics and applications, vol. 49 (1998), Kluwer Acad. Publ.: Kluwer Acad. Publ. Dordrecht), 217-220 · Zbl 0955.65061
[32] Higdon, R. L., Numerical absorbing boundary conditions for the wave equation, Math. Comp., 49, 179, 65-90 (1987) · Zbl 0654.65083
[33] Higdon, R. L., Radiation boundary conditions for elastic wave propagation, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 27, 4, 831-869 (1990) · Zbl 0718.35058
[34] Berenger, J.-P., A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves, J. Comput. Phys., 114, 2, 185-200 (1994) · Zbl 0814.65129
[35] Berenger, J.-P., Three-dimensional perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves, J. Comput. Phys., 127, 2, 363-379 (1996) · Zbl 0862.65080
[36] Tsynkov, S. V.; Turkel, E., A cartesian perfectly matched layer for the Helmholtz equation, (Tourrette, L.; Halpern, L., Absorbing boundaries and layers, domain decomposition methods. Applications to large scale computations (2001), Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: Nova Science Publishers, Inc. New York), 279-309 · Zbl 1063.76002
[37] Jensen, F. B.; Kuperman, W. A.; Porter, M. B.; Schmidt, H., Computational ocean acoustics, AIP series in modern acoustics and signal processing (1994), American Institute of Physics: American Institute of Physics New York
[38] Rossi, T.; Toivanen, J., A parallel fast direct solver for block tridiagonal systems with separable matrices of arbitrary dimension, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 20, 5, 1778-1796 (1999), (electronic) · Zbl 0931.65020
[39] Heikkola, E.; Rossi, T.; Toivanen, J., Fast direct solution of the Helmholtz equation with a perfectly matched layer or an absorbing boundary condition, Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 57, 14, 2007-2025 (2003) · Zbl 1035.65127
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.