×

Random 2-SAT and unsatisfiability. (English) Zbl 0999.68086

Summary: It is known that almost all 2-CNF formulas with \(n(1+\varepsilon)\) clauses are not satisfiable, \(\varepsilon>0\) a constant and \(n\) the number of variables. We strengthen this result, showing that it still holds with \(\varepsilon=\varepsilon(n)\geq w(n)n^{-1/4}\), where \(w(n)\) is any function that tends to infinity as \(n\) tends to infinity.

MSC:

68Q25 Analysis of algorithms and problem complexity
68R05 Combinatorics in computer science
03B05 Classical propositional logic

Keywords:

2-CNF formulas
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Ajtai, M.; Komlòs, J.; Szemerédi, E., The longest path in a random graph, Combinatorica, 1, 1, 1-12 (1981) · Zbl 0489.05052
[2] Aspvall, B.; Plass, M. F.; Tarjan, R. E., A linear-time algorithm for testing the truth of certain quantified boolean formulas, Inform. Process. Lett., 8, 121-123 (1979) · Zbl 0398.68042
[3] Athreya, K. B.; Ney, P. E., Branching Processes (1972), Springer: Springer New York · Zbl 0259.60002
[4] Bollobàs, B., Random Graphs (1985), Academic Press: Academic Press New York · Zbl 0567.05042
[5] Chvátal, V.; Reed, B., Micks gets some (the odds are on his side), (Proc. 33rd FOCS (1992)), 620-627 · Zbl 0977.68538
[6] Goerdt, A., A threshold for unsatisfiability, (Havel, J. M.; Koubek, V., Proc. MFCS. Proc. MFCS, Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci., 692 (1992), Springer: Springer Berlin), 264-274 · Zbl 1494.68095
[7] Goerdt, A., A remark on random 2-SAT (1997), Submitted
[8] Harris, T. E., The Theory of Branching Processes (1963), Springer: Springer New York · Zbl 0117.13002
[9] Lyons, R.; Peres, Y., Probability on trees and networks (1999), http://php.indiana.edu/ rdlyons/prbtree/prbtree.html
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.