×

Gauge invariance, finite temperature, and parity anomaly in \(D=3\). (English) Zbl 0944.81047

Summary: The effective gauge field actions generated by charged fermions in \(\text{QED}_3\)0 and \(\text{QCD}_3\) can be made invariant under both small and large gauge transformations at any temperature by suitable regularization of the Dirac operator determinant, at the price of parity anomalies. We resolve the paradox that the perturbative expansion is not invariant, as manifested by the temperature dependence of the induced Chern-Simons term, by showing that large (unlike small) transformations and hence their Ward identities are not perturbative order preserving. Our results are illustrated through concrete examples of field configurations, where the interplay between gauge and parity anomalies is also exhibited.

MSC:

81T50 Anomalies in quantum field theory
58J52 Determinants and determinant bundles, analytic torsion
81V05 Strong interaction, including quantum chromodynamics
81V10 Electromagnetic interaction; quantum electrodynamics

References:

[1] J. D. Lykken, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 6 pp 5155– (1991) · doi:10.1142/S0217751X91002434
[2] S. Deser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 pp 975– · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.975
[3] S. Elitzur, Nucl. Phys. B326 pp 108– (1989) · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90436-7
[4] V. P. Nair, Phys. Lett. B 61 (1989)
[5] G. Dunne, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 194 pp 197– (1989) · doi:10.1016/0003-4916(89)90036-5
[6] A. Niemi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 pp 2077– (1983) · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.2077
[7] R. Pisarski, Phys. Rev. D 32 pp 2081– (1985) · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.32.2081
[8] R. Pisarski, Phys. Rev. D 35 pp 664– (1987) · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.35.664
[9] K. Babu, Phys. Rev. D 36 pp 3725– (1987) · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.36.3725
[10] I. Aitchison, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 242 pp 77– (1995) · doi:10.1006/aphy.1995.1075
[11] N. Bralić, Phys. Lett. B 383 pp 199– (1996) · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96)00737-X
[12] D. Cabra, Phys. Lett. B 383 pp 434– (1996) · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96)00613-2
[13] R. T. Seeley, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 10 pp 288– (1968) · doi:10.1090/pspum/010/0237943
[14] P. B. Gilkey, in: Invariance Theory, the Heat-Equation and the Atiyah-Singer Index Theorem (1995) · Zbl 0856.58001
[15] S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys. 55 pp 133– (1975) · Zbl 0407.58024 · doi:10.1007/BF01626516
[16] R. E. Gamboa Saravi, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A11 pp 2643– (1996) · Zbl 0985.81601 · doi:10.1142/S0217751X96001279
[17] L. Alvarez-Gaumé, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 163 pp 288– (1985) · Zbl 0584.58049 · doi:10.1016/0003-4916(85)90383-5
[18] A. Niemi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57 pp 1102– (1986) · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.1102
[19] A. N. Redlich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52 pp 18– (1984) · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.18
[20] A. R. Rutheford, Phys. Lett. B 172 pp 187– (1986) · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)91575-3
[21] G. Dunne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 pp 3434– (1997) · Zbl 0944.81020 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.3434
[22] S. Forte, Nucl. Phys. B 288 pp 252– (1987) · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(87)90215-X
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.