×

Machine-part family formation with the adaptive resonance theory paradigm. (English) Zbl 0917.90164

Summary: The ART1 neural network paradigm employs a heuristic where new vectors are compared with group representative vectors for classification. ART1 is adapted for the cell formation problem by reordering input vectors and by using a better representative vector. This is validated with both test cases studied in literature as well as synthetic matrices. Algorithms for effective use of ART1 are proposed. This approach is observed to produce sufficiently accurate results and is therefore promising in both speed and functionality. For the automatic generation of an optimal family formation solution a decision support system can be integrated with ART1.

MSC:

90B30 Production models
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] BANEKJEE K. G., International Journal of Production Research 20 (5) pp 545– (1982) · doi:10.1080/00207548208947785
[2] BURHRIIXJK J- L., Production Engineer 56 pp 34– (1977) · doi:10.1049/tpe.1977.0129
[3] DAGLI , C. , and HUGGAHALLI , R. , 1991 , Neural Network Approach to Group Technology. InKnowledge Based Systems and Neural Networks-Techniques and Applications, R. Sharda, J. Y., Cheung, and N. J. Cochran (Eds) ( New York Elsevier ), pp. 213 – 228 .
[4] DAGLI C., Robotics and Manufacturing Recent Trends in Research, Education and Applications 4 (1992)
[5] DAGLI C., Artificial Neural Networks for Intelligent Manufacturing (1994) · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-0713-6
[6] EL-ESSAWY I. F. K., Production Engineer 51 pp 165– (1972) · doi:10.1049/tpe.1972.0027
[7] FLYNN B. B., International Journal of Production Research 25 (12) pp 1761– (1987)
[8] GROOVIiR M., Automation, Production Systems and Computer Integrated Manufacturing (1987)
[9] GUPTA R., International Journal of Production Research 20 (1) pp 73– (1982) · doi:10.1080/00207548208947749
[10] HUGGAHALLI , R. , 1991 , A neural network approach to group technology , MS thesis , University of Missouri-Rolla .
[11] HYER N. L., Group Technology at Work (1984)
[12] HYER L., International Journal of Production Research 27 (8) pp 1287– (1989) · doi:10.1080/00207548908942623
[13] KAPARTHI S., International Journal of Production Research 30 (6) pp 1353– (1992) · Zbl 0825.90501 · doi:10.1080/00207549208942961
[14] KING J. R., International Journal of Production Research 20 (2) pp 117– (1982) · doi:10.1080/00207548208947754
[15] KUMAR K. R., International Journal for Production Research 24 (2) pp 387– (1986) · Zbl 0583.90045 · doi:10.1080/00207548608919736
[16] KUSIAK A., Control and Cybernetics 15 (2) pp 139– (1986)
[17] MALAVE C. O., Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 2 (5) pp 305– (1991) · doi:10.1007/BF01471178
[18] MOON Y., Proceedings of the International Journal Conference on Neural Networks, 2 pp 667– (1990)
[19] SAHAY A. K., Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Production Research, 1 pp 1314– (1987)
[20] SEIFODDINI H., HE Transactions pp 271– (1986)
[21] SEIFODDINI H., HE Transactions pp 382– (1989)
[22] SEIFODDINI H., International Journal of Production Research 27 (2) pp 1161– (1989) · doi:10.1080/00207548908942614
[23] SIMPSON P. K., Artificial Neural Systems-Foundations, Paradigms, Applications and Implementations (1990)
[24] WASSERMAN D., Neural Computing-Theory and Practice (1989)
[25] WEI J. C., Decision Sciences 21 (2) pp 243– (1990)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.