×

Testing goodness-of-fit for nonlinear regression models with heterogeneous variances. (English) Zbl 0900.62102

Summary: This paper describes a method for testing a parametric model for the regression function and for the variance function in a parametric nonlinear regression model. The procedure is based on the robustness properties of various estimators of the parameters, the test statistics being simply equal to the normalized differences between two different estimators. The estimation of the normalizing factor using the first-order approximations of the distribution of estimators is strongly dependent on the chosen model, and thus leads to low values of the power of the test. We propose to use wild bootstrap method to estimate this normalizing factor. This method is robust to a misspecification of the variance function. Moreover, the simulation study shows that the wild bootstrap method has nearly no effect on the probability that the test rejects the null hypothesis.

MSC:

62F03 Parametric hypothesis testing
62J02 General nonlinear regression
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Bierens, H. J.: A consistent conditional moment test of functional form. Econometrica 58, 1443-1458 (1990) · Zbl 0737.62058
[2] Bunke, O., B. Droge and J. Polzehl, Model selection, Transformations and variance estimation in nonlinear regression, Discussion Paper 52/95, SFB 373, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. · Zbl 1139.62319
[3] Carroll, R. J.; Ruppert, D.: A comparison between maximum likelihood and generalized least squares in a heteroscedastic linear model. J. amer. Statist. assoc. 77, 878-882 (1982) · Zbl 0514.62079
[4] Carroll, R. J.; Ruppert, D.: Transformation and weighting in regression. (1988) · Zbl 0666.62062
[5] Cook, R. D.; Tsai, C. L.: Residuals in nonlinear regression. Biometrika 72, 23-29 (1985)
[6] Firth, D.; Glosup, J.; Hinkley, D. V.: Model checking with nonparametric curves. Biometrika 78, 245-252 (1991)
[7] Hansen, B. E.: Testing the conditional mean specification in parametric regression using the empirical score process. (1992)
[8] Härdle, W.; Mammen, E.: Bootstrap methods for nonparametric regression. Series C: Mathematical and physical sciences 335, 111-124 (1991) · Zbl 0727.62050
[9] Härdle, W.; Mammen, E.: Comparing nonparametric versus parametric regression fits. Ann. statist. 21, 1926-1947 (1993) · Zbl 0795.62036
[10] Härdle, W.; Marron, J. S.: Bootstrap simultaneous error bars for nonparametric regression. Ann. statist. 19, 778-796 (1991) · Zbl 0725.62037
[11] Haughton, D.: Consistency of a class of information criteria for model selection in nonlinear regression. Theory probab. Appl. 37, 47-53 (1993) · Zbl 0780.62049
[12] Horowitz, J.; Härdle, W.: Testing a parametric model against a semi-parametric alternative. J. econometric theory 10, 821-848 (1994)
[13] Huet, S.: Maximum likelihood and least squares estimators for a nonlinear model with heterogeneous variances. Statistics 17, 517-526 (1986) · Zbl 0632.62061
[14] Huet, S.; Jolivet, E.; Messéan, A.: La régression non-linéaire: méthodes et applications en biologie. (1992) · Zbl 0875.62280
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.