×

Bioconvection in suspensions of oxytactic bacteria: Linear theory. (English) Zbl 0882.92004

Summary: When a suspension of the bacterium Bacillus subtilis is placed in a chamber with its upper surface open to the atmosphere, complex bioconvection patterns form. These arise because the cells (a) are denser than water, and (b) swim upwards on average so that the density of an initially uniform suspension becomes greater at the top than at the bottom. When the vertical density gradient becomes large enough an overturning instability occurs which evolves ultimately into the observed patterns. The cells swim upwards because they are oxytactic, i.e. they swim up gradients of oxygen, and they consume oxygen. These properties are incorporated in conservation equations for the cell and oxygen concentrations, which, for the pre-instability stage of the pattern formation process, have been solved in a previous paper of the authors with J. O. Kessler [Bull. Math. Biol. 57, No. 2, 299– 344 (1995; Zbl 0814.92004)].
In this paper we carry out a linear instability analysis of the steady-state cell and oxygen concentration distributions. There are intrinsic differences between the shallow- and deep-chamber cell concentration distributions, with the consequence that the instability is non-oscillatory in shallow chambers, but must be oscillatory in deep chambers whenever the critical wavenumber is non-zero. We investigate how the critical Rayleigh number for the suspension varies with the three independent parameters of the problem and discuss the most appropriate definition of the Rayleigh number. Several qualitative aspects of the solution of the linear instability problem agree with experimental observation.

MSC:

92C15 Developmental biology, pattern formation
76Z99 Biological fluid mechanics
92C05 Biophysics

Citations:

Zbl 0814.92004
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Childress, J. Fluid Mech. 63 pp 591– (1975)
[2] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112080001917 · Zbl 0507.76049 · doi:10.1017/S0022112080001917
[3] DOI: 10.1007/BF01933584 · Zbl 0448.65048 · doi:10.1007/BF01933584
[4] Zahn, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 22 pp 159– (1982)
[5] DOI: 10.1086/147538 · Zbl 0123.46103 · doi:10.1086/147538
[6] Stix, Tellus 22 pp 517– (1970)
[7] DOI: 10.1146/annurev.fl.24.010192.001525 · Zbl 0825.76985 · doi:10.1146/annurev.fl.24.010192.001525
[8] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112090001914 · Zbl 0695.76056 · doi:10.1017/S0022112090001914
[9] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112088002393 · Zbl 0653.76083 · doi:10.1017/S0022112088002393
[10] Kessler, Comments Theor. Biol. 1 pp 85– (1989)
[11] Keller, J. Theor. Biol. 30 pp 235– (1971)
[12] Keller, J. Theor. Biol. 30 pp 225– (1971)
[13] DOI: 10.1137/0711028 · Zbl 0282.65065 · doi:10.1137/0711028
[14] DOI: 10.1016/0092-8240(94)00038-E · doi:10.1016/0092-8240(94)00038-E
[15] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112089002922 · Zbl 0686.76053 · doi:10.1017/S0022112089002922
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.