×

A nonparametric calibration analysis. (English) Zbl 0867.62028

Summary: We discuss a new approach to solve calibration problems in a nonparametric setting. This approach is appealing because it yields estimates of the required quantities directly. The method combines kernel and robust estimation techniques. It relies on strong approximations of the estimating process and the extreme value theorem of P. Bickel and M. Rosenblatt [ibid. 1, 1071-1095 (1973; Zbl 0275.62033)].
Using these results, we first obtain robust pointwise estimates of the parameters of interest. Second, we set up asymptotic simultaneous tolerance regions for many unknown values of the quantity to be calibrated. The technique is illustrated on a radiocarbon dating problem. The nonparametric calibration procedure proves to be of practical as well as theoretical interest; moreover, it is quick and simple to implement.

MSC:

62G07 Density estimation
62G35 Nonparametric robustness
62G20 Asymptotic properties of nonparametric inference
62G15 Nonparametric tolerance and confidence regions

Citations:

Zbl 0275.62033
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] BICKEL, P. and ROSENBLATT, M. 1973. On some global measures of the deviations of density function estimates. Ann. Statist. 1 1071 1095. Z. · Zbl 0275.62033 · doi:10.1214/aos/1176342558
[2] CARROL, R., SPIEGELMAN, C. and SACKS, J. 1988. A quick and easy multiple-use calibration-curve procedure. Technometrics 30 137 141. Z. JSTOR: · Zbl 0664.62047 · doi:10.2307/1270158
[3] CLARK, R. 1975. A calibration curve for radiocarbon dates. Antiquity 49 251 266. Z.
[4] CLARK, R. 1979. Calibration, cross-validation and carbon-14. I. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A 142 47 62. Z.
[5] CLARK, R. 1980. Calibration, cross-validation and carbon-14. II. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A 143 177 194. Z.
[6] FINNEY, D. 1978. Statistical Method in Biological Assay. Griffin, London. Z. · Zbl 0397.62083
[7] GRUET, M.-A. 1992. Analy se statistique de la calibration. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Paris XI, Orsay. Z.
[8] HALL, P., KAY, J. and TITTERINGTON, D. 1990. Asy mptotically optimal difference-based estimation of variance in nonparametric regression. Biometrika 77 521 528. Z. JSTOR: · Zbl 1377.62102 · doi:10.1093/biomet/77.3.521
[9] HARDLE, W. 1989. Asy mptotic maximal deviation of m-smoothers. J. Multivariate Anal. 29 \" 163 179. Z. · Zbl 0667.62028 · doi:10.1016/0047-259X(89)90022-5
[10] HARDLE, W. and GASSER, T. 1984. Robust non-parametric function fitting. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. \" Ser. B 46 42 51. Z. JSTOR: · Zbl 0543.62034
[11] HUBER, P. 1964. Robust estimation of a location parameter. Ann. Math. Statist. 35 73 101. Z. · Zbl 0136.39805 · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177703732
[12] HUBERT, J. 1992. Bioassay. Kendall Hunt, Dubuque, IA. Z. · Zbl 0355.92001
[13] KNAFL, G., SACKS, J., SPIEGELMAN, C. and YLVISAKER, D. 1984. Nonparametric calibration. Technometrics 26 233 242. Z. JSTOR: · doi:10.2307/1267549
[14] LECHNER, J., REEVE, C. and SPIEGELMAN, C. 1982. An implementation of the Scheffe approach ťo calibration using spline functions, illustrated by a pressure-volume calibration. Technometrics 24 229 234. Z.
[15] LIERO, H. 1982. On the maximal deviation of the kernel regression function estimate. Math. Operationsforsch. Statist. 2 171 182. Z. · Zbl 0494.62044 · doi:10.1080/02331888208801638
[16] MACK, Y. and SILVERMAN, B. 1982. Weak and strong uniform consistency of kernel regression estimates. Z. Wahrsch. Verw. Gebiete 61 405 415. · Zbl 0495.62046 · doi:10.1007/BF00539840
[17] MEE, R., EBERHARDT, K. and REEVE, C. 1991. Calibration and simultaneous tolerance intervals for regression. Technometrics 33 211 219. Z. JSTOR: · doi:10.2307/1269047
[18] MULLER, H. and SCHMITT, T. 1988. Kernel and probit estimates in quantal bioassay. J. Amer. \" Statist. Assoc. 83 750 759. Z. · Zbl 0662.62112 · doi:10.2307/2289301
[19] NADARAy A, E. 1964. On estimating regression. Theory Probab. Appl. 9 141 142. Z.
[20] OSBORNE, C. 1991. Statistical calibration: a review. Int. Statist. Rev. 59 309 336. Z. · Zbl 0743.62066
[21] ROSENBLATT, M. 1952. Remarks on a multivariate transformation. Ann. Math. Statist. 23 470 472. Z. · Zbl 0047.13104 · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729394
[22] SCHEFFE, H. 1973. A statistical theory of calibration. Ann. Statist. 1 1 37. Ź. · Zbl 0253.62023 · doi:10.1214/aos/1193342379
[23] SILVERMAN, B. 1976. On a gaussian process related to multivariate probability density estimation. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 80 135 144. Z. · Zbl 0385.60042 · doi:10.1017/S0305004100052762
[24] TUSNADY, G. 1977. A remark on the approximation of the sample d.f. in the multidimensional case. Period. Math. Hungar. 8 53 55. Z. · Zbl 0386.60006 · doi:10.1007/BF02018047
[25] WATSON, G. 1964. Smooth regression analysis. Sankhy a Ser. A 26 359 372. · Zbl 0137.13002
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.