×

Sobolev-Gagliardo-Nirenberg and Markov type inequalities on subanalytic domains. (English) Zbl 0848.46022

Summary: In this work we introduce a new parameter, \(s\geq 1\), in the well known Sobolev-Gagliardo-Nirenberg (abbreviated SGN) inequalities and show their validity (with an appropriate \(s\)) for any compact subanalytic domain. The classical form of these SGN inequalities (\(s=1\) in our formulation) fails for domains with outward pointing cusps. Our parameter \(s\) measures the degree of cuspidality of the domain. For regular domains \(s=1\). We also introduce an extension, depending on a parameter \(\sigma\geq 1\), to several variables of a local form of the classical Markov inequality on the derivatives of a polynomial in terms of its own values, and show the equivalence of Markov and SGN inequalities with the same value of parameters, \(\sigma=s\). Our extension of Markov’s inequality admits, in the case of supremum norms, a geometric characterization. We also establish several other characterizations: the existence of a bounded (linear) extension of \(C^\infty\) functions with a homogeneous loss of differentiability, and the validity of a global Markov inequality. Our methods may broadly be classified as follows:
1. Desingularization and an \(L_p\)-version of Glaeser-type estimates.
In fact we obtain a bound \(s\leq 2d +1\), where \(d\) is the maximal order of vanishing of the jacobian of the desingularization map of the domain.
2. Interpolation type inequalities for norms of functions and Bernstein-Markov type inequalities for multivariate polynomials (classical analysis).
3. Geometric criteria for the validity of local Markov inequalities (local analysis of the singularities of domains).
4. Multivariate approximation theory.
Thus our approach brings together the calculus of Glaeser-type estimates from differential analysis, the algebra of desingularization, the geometry of Markov type inequalities and the analysis of Sobolev-Nirenberg type estimates. Our exposition takes into account this interdisciplinary nature of the methods we exploit and is almost entirely self-contained.

MSC:

46E35 Sobolev spaces and other spaces of “smooth” functions, embedding theorems, trace theorems

References:

[1] [A]R.A. Adams, Sobolev Spaces, Academic Press, 1975.
[2] [B]E. Bierstone, Extension of Whitney fields from subanalytic sets, Invent. Math. 46 (1978), 277–300. · Zbl 0404.58010 · doi:10.1007/BF01390279
[3] [BMi1]E. Bierstone, P.D. Milman, Semianalytic and subanalytic sets, IHES Publ. Math. 67, (1988), 5–42. · Zbl 0674.32002
[4] [BMi2]E. Bierstone, P.D. Milman, A simple constructive proof of canonical resolution of singularities. in ”Effective Methods in Algebraic Geometry”, Progress in Math. 94, Birkhauser, Boston (1991), 11–30. · Zbl 0743.14012
[5] [BoMi1]L.P. Bos, P.D. Milman, The equivalence of the usual and quotient topologies forC (E) whenE n is Whitney p-regular, in ”Approximation Theory, Spline Functions and Applications” (S.P. Singh, ed.), Kluwer Academic Publishers (1992), 279–292.
[6] [BoMi2]L.P. Bos, P.D. Milman, On Markov and Sobolev type inequalities on compact subsets in \(\mathbb{R}\) n , in ”Topics in Polynomials in One and Several Variables and their Applications” (Th. Rassian et al. eds.), World Scientific, Singapore (1992), 81–100.
[7] [BoMi3]L. Bos, P. Milman, The equivalence of Markov and Sobolev type inequalities on compact sets in \(\mathbb{R}\) n , preprint 1991.
[8] [C]H. Cartan, Sur les classes de fonctions definies par des ineqalites portant sur les derivees successives, in ”Collected Works of H. Cartan” published by Springer-Verlag, vol. 3 (1979), 991–1019.
[9] [G]G. Glaeser, Fonctions composées différentiables, Annals of Math. 77:1 (1963), 193–209. · Zbl 0106.31302 · doi:10.2307/1970204
[10] [Go]P. Goetgheluck, Markov’s inequality on locally Lipschitzian compact subsets of \(\mathbb{R}\) n inL p -spaces. J. of Approx. Theory 49 (1987), 303–310. · Zbl 0643.41011 · doi:10.1016/0021-9045(87)90069-4
[11] [JSW]A. Jonsson, P. Sjogren, H. Wallin, Hardy and Lipschitz spaces on subsets of \(\mathbb{R}\) n , Studia Math. LXXX (1984), 141–166. · Zbl 0513.42020
[12] [M]V.G. Mazia, Sobolev Spaces, Springer, 1985.
[13] [N]S.M. Nikolskii, Approximation of Functions in Several Variables and Embedding Theorems, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1975.
[14] [P]A. Parusinksi, Lipschitz stratification of subanalytic sets, Ann. scient. Ec. Norm. Sup., 4 e serie, t. 27, (1994), 661–696.
[15] [PaPl1]W. Pawlucki, W. Plesniak, Markov’s inequality andC functions on sets with polynomial cusps, Math. Ann. 275 (1986), 467–480. · doi:10.1007/BF01458617
[16] [PaPl2]W. Pawlucki, W. Plesniak, Extension ofC functions from sets with polynomial cusps, Studia Math. LXXXVIII (1988), 279–288.
[17] [Pl]W. Plesniak, Markov’s inequality and the existence of an extension operator forC functions, J. Approx. Theory 61 (1990), 106–117. · Zbl 0702.41023 · doi:10.1016/0021-9045(90)90027-N
[18] [PlSk]W. Plesniak, A. Skiba, Polynomial approximation and linear extension operators for Gevrey classes of functions on compact sets, Pub. IRMA, Lille, 21:IV (1990), 2–11.
[19] [R]D.L. Ragozin, Constructive polynomial approximation on spheres and projective spaces, Trans. AMS 162 (1971), 157–170. · Zbl 0234.41011
[20] [Ri]T.J. Rivlin, The Chebyshev Polynomials, Wiley, New York, 1974. · Zbl 0299.41015
[21] [Ru]R.S. Rumely, Capacity Theory on Algebraic Curves, LNM 1378, Springer Verlag, New York, 1989.
[22] [So]J. Sotomayor, Inversion of smooth mappings, J. of Applied Math. and Physics 41 (1990), 306–310. · Zbl 0706.58005 · doi:10.1007/BF00945116
[23] [St]E. Stein Singular integrals and differentiability properties of functions, Princeton U. Press, Princeton NJ, 1970. · Zbl 0207.13501
[24] [T]A.F. Timan, Theory of Approximation of Functions of a Real Variable, Dover, 1994.
[25] [To]J.C. Tougeron, Ideaux de Fonctions Differentiables, Springer, 1972.
[26] [Wi]P. Wingren, Lipschitz spaces and interpolating polynomials on subsets of euclidean spaces, Springer Lecture Notes in Math. 1302 (1986), 424–435. · doi:10.1007/BFb0078893
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.