×

Varieties whose countable embeddability skeletons are semilattices. (English. Russian original) Zbl 0817.08006

Algebra Logic 32, No. 3, 154-164 (1993); translation from Algebra Logika 32, No. 3, 288-307 (1993).
For a class of algebras \(\mathcal K\), let \({\mathcal I}{\mathcal K}_{\aleph_ 0}\) denote the class of isomorphism types of finite or countable algebras from \(\mathcal K\). For \(a,b\in {\mathcal I}{\mathcal K}_{\aleph_ 0}\) being the isomorphism types of the algebras \(A,B\in {\mathcal K}\) respectively, let be \(a\leq b\) whenever \(A\) is isomorphic to a subalgebra of \(B\) and \(a\equiv b\) whenever \(a\leq b\) and \(b\leq a\). The quasiordered set \(\langle {\mathcal I}{\mathcal K}_{\aleph_ 0},\leq\rangle\) is called the countable embeddability skeleton of the class \(\mathcal K\).
The author proves that, for a locally finite discriminator variety \(\mathcal M\) of a finite type, the ordered set \(\langle{\mathcal I}{\mathcal M}_{\aleph_ 0}/\equiv,\leq\rangle\) is an upper semilattice only if a) every simple algebra \(A\in {\mathcal M}\) is quasiprimal, b) every proper subalgebra in \(A\) is one-element, and c) for any two one-element subalgebras of \(A\), there exists an automorphism of \(A\) which maps one of these subalgebras to the other. The same conditions are necessary for \(\langle {\mathcal I}{\mathcal M}_{\aleph_ 0}/\equiv, \leq\rangle\) to be a lower semilattice, but, besides that, d) every simple algebra \(A\in {\mathcal M}\) has a one-element subalgebra. Conversely, if a discriminatory variety \(\mathcal M\) of a finite type is generated by a finite set of algebras satisfying a)–c) [resp. a)–d)] then the ordered set \(\langle{\mathcal I}{\mathcal K}_{\aleph_ 0}/\equiv, \leq\rangle\) is an upper [a lower] semilattice and has rather a transparent structure.
Reviewer’s remark: The same problem was studied for non-locally finite discriminator varieties by A. G. Pinus in the paper reviewed below.

MSC:

08B10 Congruence modularity, congruence distributivity
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] A. G. Pinus, ”Relations of epimorphism and embeddability on congruence distributive varieties,”Algebra Logika,24, No. 5, 588–607 (1985). · Zbl 0619.08005
[2] W. Hodges,On Constructing Many Nonisomorphic Algebras, Universal Algebra and Its Links with Logic, Algebra, Combinatorics and Computer Algebra, Springer, Berlin (1984), pp. 67–77.
[3] A. F. Pixley, ”The ternary discriminator function in universal algebra,”Math. Ann.,191, No. 3, 167–180 (1971). · doi:10.1007/BF01578706
[4] E. Fried, G. Grätzer, and R. Quackenbush, ”Uniform congruence schemes,”Alg. Univ.,10, No. 2, 176–189 (1980). · Zbl 0431.08002 · doi:10.1007/BF02482900
[5] S. Burris and H. Werner, ”Sheaf constructions and their elementary properties,”Trans. Am. Math. Soc.,248, No. 1, 269–309 (1979). · Zbl 0411.03022 · doi:10.1090/S0002-9947-1979-0522263-8
[6] A. G. Pinus, ”Varieties whose skeletons are lattices,”Algebra Logika,31, No. 1, 74–82 (1992). · Zbl 0792.12004 · doi:10.1007/BF02259846
[7] A. G. Pinus, ”Varieties with simple countable embeddability skeletons,”Sib. Mat. Zh.,31, No. 1, 127–134 (1990). · Zbl 0704.08004
[8] H. Werner,Discriminator Algebras, Akademic-Verlag, Berlin (1978).
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.