×

Deriving the size distribution of personal wealth from “The rich get richer, the poor get poorer”. (English) Zbl 0789.62092

Summary: The folk saying, “the rich get richer, the poor get poorer”, implies that wealth flows from poorer to richer hands, a concentrating diffusion. Its academic statement is the surplus theory of social stratification. The author [Soc. Forces 65, 293-326 (1986)] abstracted this theory as an interacting particle system model of wealth distribution, the inequality process. In it, random pairs continually compete for each other’s wealth. The richer party has a greater chance of winning. The looser gives up a proportion of wealth. The author (1986) found the equilibrium distribution of the inequality process numerically.
This paper derives this distribution algebraically, showing that the inequality process implies that personal wealth is distributed as a mixture of negative binomial probability functions (NB pf’s). The NB pf is closely related to the two parameter gamma probability density function (pdf), what the author (1986) fitted to the equilibrium distribution of the process. The solution is given in terms of the parameters of the inequality process. Making wealth less fugitive by putting it into the form of human capital has the same effect on the shape of the wealth distribution as reducing the advantage of being richer in an encounter.

MSC:

62P20 Applications of statistics to economics
91D99 Mathematical sociology (including anthropology)
91B82 Statistical methods; economic indices and measures
60K35 Interacting random processes; statistical mechanics type models; percolation theory
60K99 Special processes
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] DOI: 10.1086/202960 · doi:10.1086/202960
[2] DOI: 10.2307/2578675 · doi:10.2307/2578675
[3] _____, 1990 Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section, American Statistical Association, pp 279– (1990)
[4] Bartko J., The Virginia Journal of Science 12 pp 18– · Zbl 0122.31401
[5] Boswell M. T., Random Counts in Models and Structures 2 pp 3– (1970)
[6] Dagum C., Income and Wealth Distribution, Inequality and Poverty pp 1– (1990)
[7] Feller W., An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, 1 (1957) · Zbl 0077.12201
[8] Lenski G., Power and Privilege (1966)
[9] DOI: 10.1086/261386 · doi:10.1086/261386
[10] Lindert P., Income Distribution in Historical Perspective (1991)
[11] DOI: 10.2307/1913469 · Zbl 0557.62098 · doi:10.2307/1913469
[12] DOI: 10.2307/2286411 · Zbl 0429.62080 · doi:10.2307/2286411
[13] DOI: 10.2307/1914015 · doi:10.2307/1914015
[14] Pareto V., Cours d’Economie Politique 2 (1897)
[15] Paukert F., International Labour Review 108 pp 97– (1973)
[16] Sahota G., Journal of Economic Literature 16 pp 1– (1978)
[17] DOI: 10.2307/1914221 · doi:10.2307/1914221
[18] Sherman S., Antiquity 49 pp 279– (1975)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.