×

An improved solid-shell element based on ANS and EAS concepts. (English) Zbl 07870041

Summary: This paper presents an eight-node nonlinear solid-shell element for static problems. The main goal of this work is to develop a solid-shell formulation with improved membrane response compared with the previous solid-shell element (MOS2013), presented in [the author et al., ibid. 95, No. 2, 145–180 (2013; Zbl 1352.74414)]. Assumed natural strain concept is implemented to account for the transverse shear and thickness strains to circumvent the curvature thickness and transverse shear locking problems. The enhanced assumed strain approach based on the Hu-Washizu variational principle with six enhanced assumed strain degrees of freedom is applied. Five extra degrees of freedom are applied on the in-plane strains to improve the membrane response and one on the thickness strain to alleviate the volumetric and Poisson’s thickness locking problems. The ensuing element performs well in both in-plane and out-of-plane responses, besides the simplicity of implementation. The element formulation yields exact solutions for both the membrane and bending patch tests. The formulation is extended to the geometrically nonlinear regime using the corotational approach, explained in [the author and M. V. Sivaselvan, ibid. 98, No. 2, 105–130 (2014; Zbl 1352.74413)]. Numerical results from benchmarks show the robustness of the formulation in geometrically linear and nonlinear problems.
{Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.}

MSC:

74Sxx Numerical and other methods in solid mechanics
74Kxx Thin bodies, structures
65Nxx Numerical methods for partial differential equations, boundary value problems
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] MostafaM, SivaselvanM, FelippaC. A solid‐shell corotational element based on andes, ANS and EAS for geometrically nonlinear structural analysis. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2013; 95(2):145-180. · Zbl 1352.74414
[2] MostafaM, SivaselvanM. On best‐fit corotated frames for 3D continuum finite elements. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2014; 98(2):105-130. · Zbl 1352.74413
[3] BelytschkoT, LinJI, TsayCS. Explicit algorithms for the nonlinear dynamics of shells. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering1984; 42(2):225-51. · Zbl 0512.73073
[4] BatheKJ, DvorkinEN. A four‐node plate bending element based on Mindlin/Reissner plate theory and a mixed interpolation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering1985; 21(2):367-83. · Zbl 0551.73072
[5] SimoJC, FoxDD. On a stress resultant geometrically exact shell model. I. Formulation and optimal parametrization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering1989; 72(3):267-304. · Zbl 0692.73062
[6] SimoJC, RifaiMS, FoxDD. On a stress resultant geometrically exact shell model. IV. Variable thickness shells with through‐the‐thickness stretching. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering1990; 81(1):91-126. · Zbl 0746.73016
[7] SimoJC, KennedyJG. On a stress resultant geometrically exact shell model. V. Nonlinear plasticity: formulation and integration algorithms. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering1992; 96(2):133-71. · Zbl 0754.73042
[8] Ćesar de SáJMA, Natal JorgeRM, Fontes ValenteRA, Almeida AreiasPM. Development of shear locking‐free shell elements using an enhanced assumed strain formulation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2002; 53(7):1721-50. · Zbl 1114.74484
[9] BetschP, GruttmannF, SteinE. A 4‐node finite shell element for the implementation of general hyperelastic 3D‐elasticity at finite strains. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering1996; 130(1‐2):57-79. · Zbl 0861.73068
[10] BischoffM, RammE. Shear deformable shell elements for large strains and rotations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering1997; 40(23):4427-49. · Zbl 0892.73054
[11] BrankB, KorelcJ, IbrahimbegovicA. Nonlinear Shell Problem Formulation Accounting for Through‐the‐thickness Stretching and Its Finite Element Implementation. Saxe‐coburg Publications: Stirling, UK, 200233-62.
[12] CardosoRPR, YoonJW. One point quadrature shell element with through‐thickness stretch. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2005; 194(9‐11):1161-99. · Zbl 1106.74056
[13] LuH, ItoK, KazamaK, NamuraS. Development of a new quadratic shell element considering the normal stress in the thickness direction for simulating sheet metal forming. Journal of Materials Processing Technology2006; 171(3):341-7.
[14] SansourC. A theory and finite element formulation of shells at finite deformations involving thickness change: circumventing the use of a rotation tensor. Archive of Applied Mechanics1995; 65:194-216. · Zbl 0827.73044
[15] SansourC, KollmannF. Families of 4‐node and 9‐node finite elements for a finite deformation shell theory. An assesment of hybrid stress, hybrid strain and enhanced strain elements. Computational Mechanics2000; 24:435-447. · Zbl 0959.74072
[16] ParischH. A continuum‐based shell theory for non‐linear applications. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering1995; 38(11):1855-83. · Zbl 0826.73041
[17] MieheC. A theoretical and computational model for isotropic elastoplastic stress analysis in shells at large strains. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering1998; 155(3‐4):193-233. · Zbl 0970.74043
[18] HauptmannR, SchweizerhofK. Systematic development of ‘solid‐shell’ element formulations for linear and non‐linear analyses employing only displacement degrees of freedom. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering1998; 42(1):49-69. · Zbl 0917.73067
[19] HauptmannR, SchweizerhofK, DollS. Extension of the solid‐shell concept for application to large elastic and large elastoplastic deformations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2000; 49(9):1121-41. · Zbl 1048.74041
[20] SchwarzeM, ReeseS. A reduced integration solid‐shell finite element based on the EAS and the ANS concept‐geometrically linear problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2009; 80(10):1322-55. · Zbl 1183.74315
[21] Alves de SousaRJ, Natal JorgeRM, Fontes ValenteRA, Ćesar de SáJMA. A new volumetric and shear locking‐free 3D enhanced strain element. Engineering Computations2003; 20(7):896-925. · Zbl 1063.74537
[22] AndelfingerU, RammE. EAS‐elements for two‐dimensional, three‐dimensional, plate and shell structures and their equivalence to HR‐elements. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering1993; 36(8):1311-1337. · Zbl 0772.73071
[23] AreiasPMA, Ćesar de SáJMA, Conceicão AntónioCA, FernandesAA. Analysis of 3D problems using a new enhanced strain hexahedral element. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2003; 58(11):1637-82. · Zbl 1032.74661
[24] Fontes ValenteRA, Alves De SousaRJ, Natal JorgeRM. An enhanced strain 3D element for large deformation elastoplastic thin‐shell applications. Computational Mechanics2004; 34(1):38-52. · Zbl 1141.74367
[25] HughesTJR, TezduyarTE. Finite elements based upon Mindlin plate theory with particular reference to the four‐node bilinear isoparametric element. Journal of Applied Mechanics1981; 48(3):587-96. · Zbl 0459.73069
[26] WempnerG, TalaslidisD, HwangCM. A simple and efficient approximation of shells via finite quadrilateral elements. Journal of Applied Mechanics1982; 49(1):115-20.
[27] DvorkinEN, BatheKJ. Continuum mechanics based four‐node shell element for general non‐linear analysis. Engineering Computations1984; 1(1):77-88.
[28] SzeKY, YaoLQ. A hybrid stress ANS solid‐shell element and its generalization for smart structure modelling. Solid‐shell element formulation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2000; 48(4):545-64. · Zbl 0990.74073
[29] Vu‐QuocL, TanXG. Optimal solid shells for non‐linear analyses of multilayer composites. I. Statics. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2003; 192(9‐10):975-1016. · Zbl 1091.74524
[30] KimKD, LiuGZ, HanSC. A resultant 8‐node solid‐shell element for geometrically nonlinear analysis. Computational Mechanics2005; 35(5):315-331. · Zbl 1109.74360
[31] WagnerW, KlinkelS, GruttmannF. A robust non‐linear solid shell element based on a mixed variational formulation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2006; 195(1‐3):179-201. · Zbl 1106.74058
[32] FelippaCA. The SS8 solid shell element a Fortran implementation, March 2002.
[33] CardosoRPR, YoonJW, MahardikaM, ChoudhryS, Alves de SousaRJ, Fontes ValenteRA. Enhanced assumed strain (EAS) and assumed natural strain (ANS) methods for one‐point quadrature solid‐shell elements. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2008; 75(2):156-187. · Zbl 1195.74165
[34] EdemI, GoslingP. One‐point quadrature ans solid‐shell element based on a displacement variational formulation part I geometrically linear assessment. Computer methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2012; 237‐240:177-191. · Zbl 1253.74103
[35] NorachanP, SuthasupraditS, KimK. A co‐rotational 8‐node degenerated thin‐walled element with assumed natural strain and enhanced assumed strain. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design2012; 50:70-85.
[36] BetschP, SteinE. An assumed strain approach avoiding artificial thickness straining for a non‐linear 4‐node shell element. Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering1995; 11(11):899-909. · Zbl 0833.73051
[37] SimoJC, RifaiMS. Class of mixed assumed strain methods and the method of incompatible modes. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering1990; 29(8):1595-1638. · Zbl 0724.73222
[38] SimoJC, ArmeroF. Geometrically non‐linear enhanced strain mixed methods and the method of incompatible modes. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering1992; 33(7):1413-1449. · Zbl 0768.73082
[39] SimoJC, ArmeroF, TaylorRL. Improved versions of assumed enhanced strain tri‐linear elements for 3D finite deformation problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering1993; 110(3‐4):359-386. · Zbl 0846.73068
[40] HughesTJR. Generalization of selective integration procedures to anisotropic and nonlinear media. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering1980; 15(9):1413-1418. · Zbl 0437.73053
[41] HughesTJR. The Finite Element Method: Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis. Dover Publications: Mineola, NY, 2000. · Zbl 1191.74002
[42] GarcaA, CardosoR, YoonJ. Subspace analysis to alleviate the volumetric locking in the 3D solid‐shell efg method. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics2013; 246:185-194. · Zbl 1453.74083
[43] MostafaM, SivaselvanM, FelippaC. Reusing linear finite elements in material and geometrically nonlinear analysis application to plane stress problems. Finite elements in analysis and design2013; 69(2):62-72. · Zbl 1311.74126
[44] SchwarzeM, ReeseS. A reduced integration solid‐shell finite element based on the EAS and the ANS concept‐large deformation problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering; 85(3):289-329. · Zbl 1217.74135
[45] Abed‐MeraimF, CombescureA. SHB8PS‐A new adaptative, assumed‐strain continuum mechanics shell element for impact analysis. Computers and Structures2002; 80(9‐10):791-803.
[46] Abed‐MeraimF, CombescureA. An improved assumed strain solid‐shell element formulation with physical stabilization for geometric non‐linear applications and elastic‐plastic stability analysis. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2009; 80(13):1640-1686. · Zbl 1183.74254
[47] Alves de SousaRJ, YoonJW, CardosoRPR, Fontes ValenteRA, GrácioJJ. On the use of a reduced enhanced solid‐shell (RESS) element for sheet forming simulations. International Journal of Plasticity2007; 23(3):490-515. · Zbl 1349.74314
[48] Alves de SousaRJ, CardosaRPR, Fontes ValenteRA, YoonJW, GrácioJJ, Natal JorgeRM. New one‐point quadrature enhanced assumed strain (EAS) solid‐shell element with multiple integration points along thickness ‐ part II. Nonlinear applications. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2006; 67(2):160-88. · Zbl 1110.74840
[49] SzeKY, ChanWK, PianTHH. An eight‐node hybrid‐stress solid‐shell element for geometric non‐linear analysis of elastic shells. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2002; 55(7):853-78. · Zbl 1058.74638
[50] WempnerG. Finite elements, finite rotations and small strains of flexible shells. International Journal of Solids and Structures1969; 5(2):117-54. · Zbl 0164.26505
[51] BelytschkoT, HsiehBJ. Non‐linear transient finite element analysis with convected co‐ordinates. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering1973; 7(3):255-71. · Zbl 0265.73062
[52] FelippaCA, HaugenB. A unified formulation of small‐strain corotational finite elements: I. Theory. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2005; 194(21‐24 SPEC. ISS.):2285-2335. · Zbl 1093.74055
[53] RankinCC, BroganFA. An element independent corotational procedure for the treatment of large rotations. Transactions of the ASME. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology1986; 108(2):165-74.
[54] HaugenB. Buckling and stability problems for thin shell structures using high performance finite elements. PhD Thesis, Colorado At Boulder, 1994.
[55] JiangL, ChernukaMW. Simple four‐noded corotational shell element for arbitrarily large rotations. Computers and Structures1994; 53(5):1123-1132. · Zbl 0918.73135
[56] StolarskiH, BelytschkoT, Sang‐HoL. A review of shell finite elements and corotational theories. Computational Mechanics Advances1995; 2(2):125-212. · Zbl 0843.73076
[57] BattiniJM. A modified corotational framework for triangular shell elements. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2007; 196(13‐16):1905-14. · Zbl 1173.74398
[58] CrisfieldMA, MoitaGF. A co‐rotational formulation for 2‐D continua including incompatible modes. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering1996; 39(15):2619-33. · Zbl 0883.73076
[59] MoitaGF, CrisfieldMA. A finite element formulation for 3‐D continua using the co‐rotational technique. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering1996; 39(22):3775-92. · Zbl 0884.73069
[60] BatheKJ. Finite Element Procedures. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1996.
[61] WilsonE, TaylorR, DohertyW, GhaboussiJ. Incompatible displacement models. Technical Report, 1973 Numerical and computer models in structural mechanics, Academic press New York.
[62] MacNealRH, HarderRL. Proposed standard set of problems to test finite element accuracy. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design1985; 1(1):3-20.
[63] BelytschkoT, LiuWK. Test problems and anomalies in shell finite elements. Reliability of Methods for Engineering Analysis Proceedings of the International Conference, Pineridge Press: Swansea, UK, 1986; 393-406.
[64] KasperEP, TaylorRL. A mixed‐enhanced strain method. I. Geometrically linear problems. Computers and Structures2000; 75(3):237-50.
[65] Alves de SousaRJ, CardosoRPR, Fontes ValenteRA, YoonJW, GrácioJJ, Natal JorgeRM. New one‐point quadrature enhanced assumed strain (EAS) solid‐shell element with multiple integration points along thickness: part 1‐geometrically linear applications. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2005; 62(7):952-77. · Zbl 1161.74487
[66] ReeseS. A large deformation solid‐shell concept based on reduced integration with hourglass stabilization. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2007; 69(8):1671-716. · Zbl 1194.74469
[67] TimoshenkoS, Woinowsky‐KriegerS. Theory of Plates and Shells (2nd edn.) McGraw‐Hill: New York, 1959.
[68] CookR, MalkusD, PleshaM. Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis (3rd edn.) John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1989. · Zbl 0696.73039
[69] CardosoRPR, YoonJW, Fontes ValenteRA. A new approach to reduce membrane and transverse shear locking for one‐point quadrature shell elements: linear formulation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2005; 66(2):214-49. · Zbl 1110.74844
[70] HauptmannR, DollS, SchweizerhofK. Solid‐shell elements with linear and quadratic shape functions at large deformations with nearly incompressible materials. Computers and Structures2001; 79(1):1671-1685.
[71] SzeKY, LiuXH, LoSH. Popular benchmark problems for geometric nonlinear analysis of shells. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design2004; 40(11):1551-69.
[72] StanderN, MatzenmillerA, RammE. Assessment of assumed strain methods in finite rotation shell analysis. Engineering Computations1989; 6(1):58-66.
[73] KlinkelS, WagnerW. Geometrical non‐linear brick element based on the EAS‐method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering1997; 40(24):4529-4545. · Zbl 0899.73539
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.