×

Model-based Bayesian methods for estimating cell proportions in cross- classification tables having ordered categories. (English) Zbl 0726.62080

Summary: Bayesian methods are suggested for estimating proportions in the cells of cross-classification tables having at least one classification with ordered categories. These methods utilize models for cell proportions that incorporate the category orderings. The resulting estimators are smoother and can be much more efficient than the sample proportions, yet they are consistent even if the model chosen for the smoothing does not hold. Two approaches are considered:
(1) Bayes estimators using a Dirichlet prior distribution for the proportions; (2) Bayes estimators based on normal prior distributions for association parameters in the saturated loglinear model. In each case, the means of the prior distributions are chosen to satisfy a model for ordered categorical data, such as the uniform association model. Empirical Bayes versions of the two analyses are also given.

MSC:

62H17 Contingency tables
62F15 Bayesian inference
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Agresti, A.; Kezouh, A.: Association models for multidimensional cross-classifications of ordinal variables. Communications in statistics 12, 1261-1276 (1983)
[2] Bishop, Y. M. M.; Fienberg, S. E.; Holland, P. W.: Discrete multivariate analysis. (1975) · Zbl 0332.62039
[3] Brown, P. J.; Rundell, P. W. K.: Kernel estimates for categorical data. Technometrics 27, 293-299 (1985) · Zbl 0611.62058
[4] Chuang, C.: Empirical Bayes methods for a two-way multiplicative-interaction model. Communications in statistics 11, 2977-2989 (1982) · Zbl 0512.62062
[5] Clogg, C.: Some models for the analysis of association in multiway cross-classifications having ordered categories. J. amer. Statist. assoc. 77, 803-815 (1982)
[6] Dohrenwend, B. P.; Dohrenwend, B. S.: Social status and psychological disorder: A causal inquiry. (1969)
[7] Fienberg, S. E.; Holland, P. W.: Methods for eliminating zero counts in contingency tables. Random counts on models and structures (1970)
[8] Fienberg, S. E.; Holland, P. W.: Simultaneous estimation of multinomial cell probabilities. J. amer. Statist. assoc. 68, 683-691 (1973) · Zbl 0267.62030
[9] Goodman, L. A.: Simple models for the analysis of association in cross-classifications having ordered categories. J. amer. Statist. assoc. 74, 537-552 (1979)
[10] Goodman, L. A.: The analysis of cross-classified data having ordered and/or unordered categories: association models, correlation models, and asymmetry models for con tingency tables with or without missing entries. Ann. statist. 13, 10-69 (1985) · Zbl 0613.62070
[11] Ighodaro, A.; Santner, T.: Ridge type estimators of multinomial cell probabilities. Statistical decision theory and related topics III 2 (1982) · Zbl 0573.62060
[12] Laird, N.: Empirical Bayes methods for two-way contingency tables. Biometrika 65, 581-590 (1978) · Zbl 0393.62016
[13] Leonard, T.: Bayesian estimation methods for two-way contingency tables. J. roy. Statist. soc. 37, 23-37 (1975) · Zbl 0297.62042
[14] Maxwell, A. E.: Analysing qualitative data. (1961) · Zbl 0114.09705
[15] Simonoff, J. S.: A penalty function approach to smoothing large sparse contingency tables. Ann. statist. 11, 208-218 (1983) · Zbl 0527.62043
[16] Srole, L.; Langner, T. S.; Michael, S. T.; Opler, M. K.; Rennie, T. A. C.: Mental health in the metropolis: the midtown Manhattan study. (1962)
[17] Titterington, D. M.: A comparative study of kernel-based density estimates for categorical data. Technometrics 22, 259-268 (1980) · Zbl 0441.62036
[18] Titterington, D. M.; Bowman, A. W.: A comparative study of smoothing procedures for ordered categorical data. J. statist. Comput. simul. 21, 291-312 (1985)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.