×

Projective geometries as cover-preserving sublattices. (English) Zbl 0703.06005

It belongs to the folklore of lattice theory that whenever \(M_ 3\) (the 5-element modular nondistributive lattice) can be embedded into a finite modular lattice L, then \(M_ 3\) also has a cover-preserving embedding into L. Formalizing this concept, the authors say that a finite lattice K has the cover-preserving embedding property (CPEP, for short) with respect to a variety \({\mathbb{V}}\) of lattices if whenever K can be embedded into a finite lattice in \({\mathbb{V}}\), then K has a cover-preserving embedding into L.
In the present paper the authors determine which finite projective geometries P satisfy the CPEP with respect to the variety \({\mathbb{M}}\) of modular lattices. (A finite projective geometry is treated here as a finite complemented simple modular lattice). The main result is the following:
Theorem. Let P be a finite projective geometry. Then P has the CPEP with respect to the variety \({\mathbb{M}}\) of all modular lattices if, and only if, one of the following conditions holds: (i) the length of P is 1; (ii) the length of P is 2 and P is isomorphic to \(M_ 3\); (iii) the length of P is greater than 2 and either p is nonarguesian or P is arguesian and, for some prime p, each interval in P of length 2 contains \(p+1\) atoms.
Reviewer: M.Stern

MSC:

06C05 Modular lattices, Desarguesian lattices
05B25 Combinatorial aspects of finite geometries
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Crawly, P. andDilworth, R. P.,Algebraic Theory of Lattices. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Hills, N.J., 1973.
[2] Day, A., Geometrical applications of modular lattices. In:Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 1004, Universal Algebra and Lattice Theory, Edited by R. S. Freese and O. C. Garcia, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1983, pp. 111-141. · Zbl 0516.06008
[3] Day, A. andJe?ek, J.,The amalgamation property for varieties of lattices. Mathematics Report #1-83, Lakehead University. · Zbl 0548.06002
[4] Freese, R.,The variety of modular lattices is not generated by its finite members. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.255 (1979), 277-300. · Zbl 0421.06010 · doi:10.1090/S0002-9947-1979-0542881-0
[5] Fried, E. andGr?tzer, G.,Pasting and modular lattices. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.106 (1989). · Zbl 0678.06005
[6] Gr?tzer, G.,General Lattice Theory. Pure and Applied Mathematics series, Academic Press, New York, N.Y., 1978; Birkh?user Verlag, Matematische Reihe, Band 52, Basel, 1978.
[7] Gr?tzer, G. andKelly, D.,Products of lattice varieties. Algebra Universalis21 (1985), 33-45. · Zbl 0587.06002 · doi:10.1007/BF01187554
[8] Gr?tzer, G. andKelly, D.,The lattice variety D. D. Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged)51 (1987), 73-80. Addendum.
[9] Herrmann, C. andHuhn, A. P.,Zum Begriff der Charakteristik modularer Verb?nde. Math. Z.144 (1975), 185-194. · Zbl 0316.06006 · doi:10.1007/BF01214134
[10] Hutchinson, G. andCz?dli, G.,A test for identities satisfied in lattices of submodules. Algebra Universalis8 (1978), 269-309. · Zbl 0384.06009 · doi:10.1007/BF02485400
[11] Slavik, A.,A note on the amalgamation property in lattice varieties. Comm. Math. Univ. Carolinae21 (1980), 473-478. · Zbl 0444.06001
[12] von Neumann, J.,Continuous Geometry, Princeton Mathematical Series, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1960. · Zbl 0171.28003
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.