×

Genotypic distribution at the limits to natural and artificial selection with mutation. (English) Zbl 0617.92014

Changes in the genotype distribution under stabilizing selection and long term truncation selection were studied through the cumulants of the density function expressed by Gram-Charlier expansion and Hermite polynomials.
Departures from normality were insignificant under additive gene effects, large number of loci and when gene frequencies were not extreme; linkage disequilibrium had only a minor role. At the selection limit, attained mainly through natural selection, skewness and kurtosis were high if mutation was an important cause of genetic variability.
Reviewer: J.S.Murty

MSC:

92D10 Genetics and epigenetics
62P10 Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Brown, W. P.; Bell, A. E., Genetic analysis of a “plateaued” population of Drosophila melanogaster, Genetics, 46, 407-425 (1961)
[2] Bulmer, M. G., Linkage disequilibrium and genetic variability, Genet. Res, 23, 281-289 (1974)
[3] Bulmer, M. G., The Mathematical Theory of Quantitative Genetics (1980), Oxford Univ. Press (Clarendon): Oxford Univ. Press (Clarendon) Oxford · Zbl 0441.92007
[4] Clayton, G. A.; Morris, J. A.; Robertson, A., An experimental check on quantitative genetical theory. I. Short-term responses to selection, J. Genet, 55, 131-151 (1957)
[5] Clayton, G. A.; Robertson, A., An experimental check on quantitative genetical theory. II. The long-term effects of selection, J. Genet, 55, 152-170 (1957)
[6] Cornish, E. A.; Fisher, R. A., Moments and cumulants in the specification of distributions, Rev. Inst. Int. Statist, 5, 307-320 (1937) · JFM 63.1081.01
[7] Elandt, R. C., The folded normal distribution: Two methods of estimating parameters from moments, Technometrics, 3, 551-562 (1961) · Zbl 0103.37006
[8] Falconer, D. S., Introduction to Quantitative Genetics (1981), Longman: Longman London
[9] Falconer, D. S.; King, J. W.B., A study of selection limits in the mouse, J. Genet, 51, 561-581 (1953)
[10] Finney, D. J., The consequences of selection for a variate subject to errors of measurement, Rev. Inst. Int. Statist, 24, 1-10 (1956) · Zbl 0073.35604
[11] Finney, D. J., The transformation of a distribution under selection, Indian J. Statist. Ser. A, 23, 309-324 (1961), Part 4 · Zbl 0101.36005
[12] Fisher, R. A.; Immer, F. R.; Tedin, O., The genetical interpretation of statistics of the third degree in the study of quantitative inheritance, Genetics (Princeton), 17, 107-124 (1932)
[13] Frankham, R., Origin of genetic variation in selection lines, (Robertson, A., Selection Experiments in Laboratory and Domestic Animals (1980), Commonwealth Bureaux: Commonwealth Bureaux Slough), 56-68
[14] Gallego, A.; Lopez-Fanjul, C., The number of loci affecting a quantitative character in Drosophila melanogaster revealed by artificial selection, Genet. Res, 42, 137-149 (1983)
[15] Hammond, K.; James, J. W., Genes of large effect and the shape of the distribution of a quantitative character, Aust. J. Biol. Sci, 23, 867-876 (1970)
[16] Hammond, K.; James, J. W., The use of higher degree statistics to estimate the number of loci which contribute to a quantitative character, Heredity, 28, 146-147 (1972)
[17] Hill, W. G., Rates of change in quantitative traits from fixation of new mutations, (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 79 (1982)), 142-145 · Zbl 0498.92010
[18] Hill, W. G., Predictions of response to artificial selection from new mutations, Genet. Res, 40, 255-278 (1982)
[19] Hill, W. G., Population size and design of breeding programmes, (Proceedings 3rd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Vol. XII (1986), Lincoln: Lincoln Nebraska), 245-256
[20] Johnson, N. L.; Kotz, S., (Distribution in Statistics; Continuous Univariate Distributions, Vol. 1 (1970), Wiley: Wiley New York) · Zbl 0213.21101
[21] Kendall, M. G.; Stuart, A., Distribution Theory, (The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 1 (1969), Griffin: Griffin London) · Zbl 0171.39601
[22] Latter, B. D.H., Selection in finite populations with multiple alleles. II. Centripetal selection, mutation, and isoallelic variation, Genetics, 66, 165-186 (1979)
[23] Lindley, D. V., Regression lines and the linear functional relationship, J. Roy. Statist. Sup, 9, 218-244 (1947) · Zbl 0031.17202
[24] Mardia, K. V., Families of Bivariate Distributions (1970), Griffin: Griffin London · Zbl 0223.62062
[25] O’Donald, P., The distribution of genotypes produced by alleles segregating at a number of loci, Heridity, 26, 233-241 (1971)
[26] Pearson, K., The fifteen constant bivariate frequency surface, Biometrika, 17, 268-313 (1925) · JFM 51.0389.03
[27] Pretorius, S. J., Skew bivariate frequency surface, examined in the light of numerical illustrations, Biometrika, 22, 109-223 (1930) · JFM 56.1107.04
[28] Raff, M. S., On approximating the point binomial, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc, 51, 293 (1956) · Zbl 0071.12902
[29] Rao, B. R.; Garg, M. L.; Li, C. C., Correlation between the sample variances in a singly truncated bivariate normal distribution, Biometrika, 55, 433-436 (1968)
[30] Roberts, R. C., The limits to artificial selection for body weight in the mouse. II. The genetic nature of the limits, Genet. Res, 8, 361-375 (1966)
[31] Turelli, M., Heritable genetic variation via mutation-selection balance: Lerch’s Zeta meets the abdominal bristles, Theor. Pop. Biol, 25, 138-193 (1984) · Zbl 0541.92015
[32] Weldon, W. F.R., A first study of natural selection in Clausilia laminata (Montagu), Biometrika, 1, 109-124 (1901)
[33] Yoo, B. H., Long-term selection for a quantitative character in large replicate populations of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Lethals and visible mutants with large effects, Genet. Res, 35, 18-30 (1980)
[34] Zeng, Z.-B.; Hill, W. G., The selection limit due to the conflict between truncation and stabilizing selection with mutation, Genetics, 114, 1313-1328 (1986)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.