Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willamette Valley Fruit Company

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Swarm ♠ 01:21, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Willamette Valley Fruit Company (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article - large but I couldn't verify notability. Boleyn (talk) 20:09, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - This company is located 30 minutes up the road from me. I'm neither here nor there on it but will take some time assessing notability, approaching the question with a completely open mind. To start: THIS definitely counts towards fulfillment of GNG (calling for the existence of multiple, independently-published sources of presumed reliability), being a publication from Marion County, Oregon. Carrite (talk) 18:08, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

THIS is coverage from the Salem Statesman-Journal about the related Willamette Valley Pie Company — logos are essentially identical for the two firms, clearly one corporate entity. Carrite (talk) 18:11, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

THIS is coverage from the Portland Oregonian about the company's maze run. Carrite (talk) 18:17, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be an article on the company in Oregon Living magazine, but their website is down. I have contacted them via Facebook in an effort to get that back up. Carrite (talk) 18:18, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And HERE is substantial coverage via CountryTravelerOnline. I've seen enough, this firm meets GNG, in my opinion. Carrite (talk) 18:21, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Company meets GNG based on the above sources (which are not exhaustive). Carrite (talk) 18:21, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.