Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Barbalet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seems like consensus is in favour of removing everything Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:49, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Barbalet

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person does not appear to be notable. The article is sourced entirely to his own podcast and other projects and I can find no evidence that the outside world has really taken notice. The fluffy padding content about his vacations, teenage programming hobby, and name-drops of famous people are a dead giveaway of non-notability.

I am also nominating the following related pages because they are all part of a walled garden of Barbalet's non-notable projects:

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Reyk _YO! 10:36, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:59, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:59, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:00, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:00, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Fails WP:GNG and is clearly a puff piece. He "spent time with Wozniak" - dead giveaway. Skirts⁸⁹ 11:13, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have found and added several articles as references. I will check for more, and also for evidence about whether he meets an WP:SNG. The article needs a lot of editing. RebeccaGreen (talk) 14:53, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/merge together Does not appear to be notable with substantive sources but should otherwise be combined since the four are certainly not notable separately. Reywas92^Talk 15:50, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. Fails GNG, promotional tone that relies heavily on primary sources. – Broccoli & Coffee ^{(Oh hai)} 05:54, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not much sources cited here Laosilika (talk) 17:44, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. Per nom. Promotion of non-notable topics. --mikeu ^talk 14:29, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.