Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Buckethead Show

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No indication this show satisfies WP:GNG. RL0919 (talk) 12:15, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Buckethead Show (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are no sources in the article, and the only sources I could find via google were Wikipedia mirrors, a couple of really old PR releases, and one reddit page titled "Whatever happened to the Buckethead Show?"

I can't find any indication that this show is at all notable. Marianna251TALK 20:01, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Marianna251TALK 20:01, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:14, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect - (to WTKS-FM#Previous_shows) Neither GNG or, more relevantly, WP:RPRGM, is satisfied. The (radio) geographic reach isn't particularly impressive, and the guideline notes the higher importance of reliable sources. As there don't seem to be any of them, it shouldn't remain. The station has a couple of lines on it, reasonable due to the significant amount of radio time it took up over the years. Nosebagbear (talk) 09:46, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Subject fails WP:GNG. Also, WP:Redirects are costly. Chris Troutman (talk) 10:22, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't seem to be a clearcut example of any on that (as a side note, I take particular dispute to the nutshell summary including "Wikipedia has a very good search facility." Twaddle to that.) Nosebagbear (talk) 10:50, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Nosebagbear:, is this comment in the right place? I can't see an edit summary matching that quote, and you commented above that you don't think this article meets GNG, so Chris Troutman was largely agreeing with you. I'm confused! Marianna251TALK 20:30, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Another Orlando-based radio show that was only notable in Orlando and with very limited national notability because of the Sirius XM deal. Unless your name is Rush, Glenn, Colin, or Paul Harvey, the vast majority of late morning/early afternoon radio shows in the United States are non-notable since most of the audience is listening to a music station at work, listening to non-offensive talk radio that won't earn you a visit to the boss's office, or doing anything else. Also not a shock; this is zero-sourced. No point to a redirect as this just reads as 'morning show that failed at being a morning show'. SBK Live would also be a prime deletion candidate. Nate • (chatter) 04:34, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good point about the redirect. If I'd come across the WTKS-FM article another way I would have considered deleting the entire "Previous shows" section as pointless puffery - it says a lot when the only source in the whole section is a press release about a cast member's subsequent project. I haven't touched it since I was the one to start this AfD, though. Marianna251TALK 20:18, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.