Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stereo Love (album)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Edward Maya. Non-admin closure. Jujutacular T · C 20:08, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Stereo Love (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:MUSIC, WP:SOURCES, WP:CRYSTAL, WP:NALBUM, WP:NMUSIC, WP:HAMMER, WP:CRUFT, WP:MOS and WP:IBX PopMusicBuff talk 15:32, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- You already voted via your nomination. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:01, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Is there a such thing as WP:GUIDELINECRUFT? But seriously, redirect to Edward Maya. Erpert (let's talk about it) 15:49, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow Talk 04:27, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Edward Maya. There are a whole bunch of things wrong with this nomination. WP:SOURCES, WP:MOS and WP:IBX are not part of the process of nominating an article for deletion. They are reasons to expand or improve the article, which is done by either fixing the article text yourself or by adding edit tags to the top, such as "the article needs additional citations" etc. (See Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup.) When it comes to sources, the nominator should make a good faith effort to go out and search for reliable sources rather than just conclude that the article should be deleted because nobody else has added any sources so far. Also, referencing WP:CRUFT in this nomination makes no sense because that term applies to excessive amounts of geek trivia, which this article definitely does not have. The nominator is closer to reality on the notability guidelines and WP:CRYSTAL. It appears that the album will be released sometime in the near future but I cannot find any reliable sources for a confirmed release date. But the album already has two singles that charted very high in Europe so the album will have a good chance of achieving notability whenever it is released. Therefore the article can be redirected to the artist for now. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:01, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect since it seems to be the consensus so far. PopMusicBuff talk 16:01, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.