Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rule-developing experimentation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Daniel (talk) 18:54, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rule-developing experimentation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a concept promoted by consultant Howard Moskowitz and collaborators. There is no substantial coverage of this concept in independent reliable sourcing. If there is anything worth keeping, it can be merged with the Moskovitz article. Thenightaway (talk) 20:02, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:25, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: even if the article were rewritten to sound less promotional, there's still no independent sources to suggest notability. Owen× ☎ 21:36, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not seeing the in-depth secondary coverage. Neutrality^talk 00:27, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.