Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajiul Huda Dipto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:14, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rajiul Huda Dipto

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

By having a look on the sources, one can easily argue that the article is an advertisement and fails to fulfill any criteria about WP:BIO. All of those sources are trivial coverage, some of them only mentioned his name on a routine news article and some of them don't. The article also declined during draft. ~ Nahid ^Talk 03:33, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:51, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:52, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:52, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:52, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:22, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:22, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:23, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Clearly promotional, + non-notable + no WP:RS, full with self-published and affiliated, so ideally this article should have been CSDed- Promo, and the user should be reported to admin board. QueerEcofeminist^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 17:51, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on "the user should be reported to admin board". I suppose that you mean WP:ANI. That page says: "This page is for discussion of urgent incidents and chronic, intractable behavioral problems." There is no urgent incident, and no evidence of a chronic, intractable behavioral problem. -- Hoary (talk) 13:09, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have no proof but i suspect this might be paid editing since this user & their sock-puppet trying to create article about non-notable person. Anyway delete this, clearly promotional, non-notable, fails WP:GNG. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 16:54, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Promotional, NoWP:RS. --SalmanZ (talk) 21:56, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.