Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AS 2805

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to ISO 8583. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:06, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AS 2805 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. TarnishedPath^talk 11:31, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Australia. TarnishedPath^talk 11:31, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete My PROD was removed with no improvement. No indication this generic standard is notable – there's a lot of standards out there and would need sources and explanation beyond statement of existence. Reywas92^Talk 13:46, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge into Standards Australia - Follow-on to AS3959. Even with good sourcing (which this does not have), the subject does not pass WP:GNG. It clearly fails WP:SIGCOV and nothing else points to notability. This is an individual standard that, as important as it may be in specific circumstances, is simply not that notable. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 14:19, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into ISO 8583 as much of the content in that article also applies to AS 2805. Icd (talk) 10:53, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:11, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Two different Merge targets proposed here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:53, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:08, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Slightly prefer the merge to ISO 8583. (Redirect) Suriname0 (talk) 04:04, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.