User talk:Douglas the Comeback Kid

Thank you for uploading File:Biometric British Citizen and British National (Overseas) passports.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 02:38, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome. There is no particular criteria. You can give one to anyone you think deserves recognition. See WP:BARNSTAR.   Will Beback  talk  06:27, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please expand the nav template following the lines of that of HK? I.e. adding piers that are ports of entry? 218.250.143.16 (talk) 18:23, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Languages of Hong Kong, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Teochew (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. Sorry about that. Douglas the Comeback Kid (talk) 17:11, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. I'm really sorry for that. I've corrected the mistake. Douglas the Comeback Kid (talk) 21:49, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help look into the following problem? From what I observed, many Hong Kong and Macau categories are subcats of the corresponding by-country parent categories (by their status of dependencies), and are subcats of the corresponding China or PRC categories with a <spacebar>Macau or <spacebar>Hong Kong catsort (in some cases an asterisk is used instead in place of the <spacebar> tho). But when I apply it to other categories, SchmuckyTheCat (talk · contribs) undid them en masse. Please response at WP talk:Categorisation. 218.250.159.25 (talk) 20:51, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well spotted - [1] - do you have a source for that? Deryck C. 22:42, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Far East, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mandarin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've reverted your cut-and-paste move of Ngwa. I guess you weren't aware that cut-and-paste moves aren't allowed. Please read WP:move for the proper ways of moving pages. Also please read WP:Primarytopic: not all topics are equal. A disused romanization of Wuhua County is not as prominent as a people in Nigeria. In such cases, a WP:hatnote would be sufficient (I've added one to Ngwa), and turning Ngwa to a disambiguation page is unwarranted. Regards, Zanhe (talk) 08:33, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for the mistake. Thanks for letting me know! Douglas the Comeback Kid (talk) 02:43, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Happy editing! -Zanhe (talk) 05:01, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Douglas. I see that you are adding the old Romanized name to a lot of Chinese articles. I'm not sure that such information deserves a place in the first sentence of the lede, or even the lede at all. Perhaps it is fact best placed in the history sections. What do you think? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 16:12, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anna! Some Chinese places are also known by their Chinese Postal Map Romanisation names (e. g., Peking ('Beijing')), and these have also been used by many books, particularly those published in the time when Hanyu Pinyin spelling, the current standard for romanising Chinese place names, was not common. I believe the inclusion of Chinese Postal Map Romanisation spelling, which had long been the standard for romanising Chinese place names, can reflect its historic status as the standard for romanising Chinese place names and facilitate research on China. Douglas the Comeback Kid (talk) 16:27, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Douglas. I think it's good information too. I also think that most people visiting the pages for serious research would certainly encounter the Romanization if placed in the history section. It just seems to occupy such a large part of the top of the lede. I'm not sure that it serves most of the visitors most of the time. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 16:33, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As I've mentioned before, not all of the Chinese Postal Map Romanisation names are 'historic'; so I don't think placing all Chinese Postal Map Romanisation names in the history section is appropriate. Also, I don't see how five extra words (i. e. 'Chinese', 'Postal', 'Map', 'Romanisation' and the Chinese Postal Map Romanisation name) can ocupy a 'large part' of the top of the lede.

By the way, the inclusion of the Chinese Postal Map Romanisation names at the top of the lede is a common practice in the corresponding articles in the Chinese Wikipedia.

I think you're worrying too much about this, Anna. Douglas the Comeback Kid (talk) 05:31, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're probably right. How many articles does this affect? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:22, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I take you're asking how many Chinese Postal Map Romanisation names have been included in articles so far. I'm afraid I don't know the exact number - before I did my edits, I'd already seen quite a number of articles about Chinese places with the corresponding Chinese Postal Map Romanisation names included in the English Wikipedia. Douglas the Comeback Kid (talk) 07:53, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Douglas. I posted at Wikiproject China to see what others think. I'm very much an inclusionist, yet am not sure whether or not these additions are a good idea. So, I am rather concerned that, sooner or later, someone else will challenge and undo your hard work.

Also, I don't know what I'm doing half the time. I trust the community far more than my own judgement.

Please see: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject China#Chinese Postal Map Romanisation in the lede of location articles

Best wishes,

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:19, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're free to do what you want, so I won't stop you. WikiProject China is full of fools (many of whom are Chinese) who endorse Hanyu Pinyin and reject the proper Wade–Giles Romanisation system and Chinese Postal Map Romanisation. English is a European language so European names should take precedence (the proper Wade–Giles Romanisation system and Chinese Postal Map Romanisation are European inventions); it is not up to the Chinese, to which English does not belong, to dictate to us how we use our language Douglas the Comeback Kid (talk) 08:26, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Governor-General of India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Simla (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I undid your recent edits to Republic of China (1912–1949). The existing guideline is WP:PINYIN, which states to use pinyin by default unless a non-pinyin form is more common. Mainland Chinese geographical place names in contemporary historical scholarship are universally rendered in pinyin, no matter the time period in question, and our current Manual of Style supports this convention. --Jiang (talk) 19:53, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Supreme Court (Hong Kong), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Court of Final Appeal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please. If you have to write things in archaic English form, don't mark it as wade-giles. Wade-giles is not English.

For example, this is wrong: Yongle Emperor (wade-giles: Yung-lo Emperor) --Cold Season (talk) 01:55, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Fraggle81. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Ellen MacArthur because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Fraggle81 (talk) 00:38, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, a mistaken revert on my part. I've reinstated your edits to Ellen MacArthur please ignore the above message. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 00:43, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Editor's Barnstar
		This barnstar is given to you in recognition of your contributions to Hong Kong-related articles. Knight of Gloucestershire (talk) 12:31, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Knight of Gloucestershire! Douglas the Comeback Kid (talk) 18:41, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Clifford Dupont, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page His Excellency (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hong Kong Sheng Kung Hui, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dr (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:47, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have seen your edits at "Template:Cantonese cuisine". In most cases I have no problem with your removals, but I don't understand the removal of Pineapple bun and Eggette. Can you explain why you have removed them? The Banner talk 00:20, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pineapple bun and eggette are not 'Cantonese' because the cooking method and the source of inspiration is Western. They are essntially 'Western food' created in the East. Douglas the Comeback Kid (talk) 00:31, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, okay. I was a bit confused because they seemed to have a separate Cantonese name. But to your opinion it is "imported food". Clear, thanks. The Banner talk 10:24, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Pineapple bun and eggette are Hong Kong inventions, not Chinese inventions. The languages of Hong Kong are English and Cantonese Chinese, so they have both a Cantonese Chinese name and an English name. Douglas the Comeback Kid (talk) 15:44, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited English trust law, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Proprietary and Surcharge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:15, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Douglas the Comeback Kid, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Convention on Road Signs and Signals, appears to be directly copied from http://guidinglight.com/vienna_convention_on_road_signs_and_signals/encyclopedia.htm. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Convention on Road Signs and Signals if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 15:43, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Douglas the Comeback Kid, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Coat of arms of the South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands, appears to be directly copied from http://www.ngw.nl/heraldrywiki/index.php?title=South_Georgia_and_the_South_Sandwich_Islands. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Coat of arms of the South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 21:05, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brahma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tibetan language (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Macao pataca, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hong Kong-Macau Ferry Terminal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I noticed that here the Chinese names of the Chinese characters and actors were deleted. Why was this the case? WhisperToMe (talk) 05:46, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• The Chinese names of the three ethnic Han Chinese directors are important and need to be displayed. Even though they are NOT Chinese citizens, they are ethnic Chinese and the practice with ethnic Chinese is to show their Chinese names. See Amy Tan, Andrew Lih, Amy Chua, etc. Also the Variety magazine article on the film places the Chinese names of the directors in it, calling attention to those names. WhisperToMe (talk) 05:50, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Thanks for letting me know. I'm sorry about that. Douglas the Comeback Kid (talk) 09:15, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. Happy editing! :) - Anyway, are you interested in developing the written Cantonese version of the article? It is located at zh-yue:Verax WhisperToMe (talk) 20:09, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Secretary of State for Dominion Affairs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dominions (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:33, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Douglas the Comeback Kid, I've seen your edits on cities like Mumbai, Kochi etc where you changed "formely known as" to "also known as". This made me a little confused since by law, Mumbai has replaced Bombay but still some people continue to refer to it by the old name. The same can be said for other city names too. So don't you think formerly is more accurate, at least in the lead? while there can be mention of the old name still being used in the rest of the article or something. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 06:41, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ugog Nizdast! Yes, I'm aware that the official names of those cities have been changed while some people continue to use the former offical names: since people use both names interchangeably, I don't see why using 'also known as' is inappropriate; also, it's been explained in the rest of the article that there have been changes in the offical names, so I don't think it'll be confusing. Douglas the Comeback Kid (talk) 09:33, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm then you will also know the "political weight" such a wording would carry :) I really don't know whether it's appropriate for the article or not, and you do have a point. All I'm worried about is these might attract some regional chauvinists/anonymous/troublesome editors, if not now, then certainly in the future. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 09:45, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since it's a fact that both names are used interchangeably, they've no legitimate reason to dispute that and we can always shut them up by pointing to this fact. Douglas the Comeback Kid (talk) 14:31, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see...then it's all good. Thanks for your time, Ugog Nizdast (talk) 14:41, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, mate. Douglas the Comeback Kid (talk) 04:42, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Viceroy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Simla (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning. I have reverted your edits changing formerly known/spelt as to also known as. The older names were replaced in May 1983 by the Names (Alteration) Act Chapter 10:14 and have not been in common use since then. They are not alternate names but historic names no longer in use. Babakathy (talk) 07:27, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And the same applies to rivers. The older names are not alternative names but historic names no longer in use. Whilst identifying them as former names is helpful, referring to them as alternatives is misleading. We don't say Rhodesia is an alternative name for Zimbabwe or Zambia, for example - or that the USSR is an alternative name for the Russian Federation. Babakathy (talk) 10:13, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As you may know, VisualEditor ("Edit ^beta") is currently available on the English Wikipedia only for registered editors who choose to enable it. Since you have made 100 or more edits with VisualEditor this year, I want to make sure that you know that you can enable VisualEditor (if you haven't already done so) by going to your preferences and choosing the item, "MediaWiki:Visualeditor-preference-enable". This will give you the option of using VisualEditor on articles and userpages when you want to, and give you the opportunity to spot changes in the interface and suggest improvements. We value your feedback, whether positive or negative, about using VisualEditor, at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback. Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:29, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Manchukuo Imperial Army, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hsi Hsia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain the rationale behind this edit (you left the edit summary empty)? The .ax domain is used by for example http://www.posten.ax/ and these institutions are found on the island of Åland, which is a part of Finland. --hydrox (talk) 16:16, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, hydrox! I've removed '.ax' from the list because my understanding is that the Åland Islands is a Finnish dependent territory and not fully part of Finland: it is a common practice to treat dependent territories as separate entities. The country infobox, rather than a 'state'/'province'/'autonomous region' infobox, is used in the article 'Åland Islands', so I believe that there is a need to maintain consistency of style by treating the Åland Islands as a separate entity from Finland across all Wikipedia articles and that the removal of '.ax' is justified. Douglas the Comeback Kid (talk) 16:33, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Åland is a Finnish province with partial autonomy. It's status is quite similar to that of Hong Kong and Macau in relation to PRC, or Faroe Islands in relation to Denmark. I can now see, that it is the prevailing practice to leave any partially autonomous territories TLDs out from the main country article, so I am happy with this as it now stands. Thanks, hydrox (talk) 16:44, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, mate. Douglas the Comeback Kid (talk) 18:53, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed your edits to this article. There are a number of sources that appear to say that the definite article is part of the short title, including copies of the Short Titles Act 1896, Halsbury's Statutes, The Statutes Revised, certain pages on legislation.gov.uk and Schedules of repeals from Acts passed up to the 1970s. There are some sources which might indicate the contrary, particularly more recent Schedules of repeals, but I am not aware of anything conclusive. James500 (talk) 16:24, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm AbigailAbernathy. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Hsinchu County, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. A Wild Abigail Appears! _{Capture me. Moves.} 20:04, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A Wild Abigail Appears! _{Capture me. Moves.} 20:18, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see your restore of Vietnamese fonts was reverted with the comment "feel free to propose a new RM" - that means use a template at WP:RM to propose a move. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:48, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Before changing this from a redirect to Template:Country data British Raj into a new template that renders a different flag, you will need to visit all the transclusion instances where Template:Country data British India is used. Many editors used "British India" as a shorthand form of "British Empire in India", for example, intending the link produced by {{flag|British India}} to go to the British Raj article. Instead, your edit makes that link go to Presidencies and provinces of British India, which is almost certainly not what is intended in the large majority of cases. Please go and update those articles before making the template change. Thanks — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 17:31, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I started the RM discussion a couple weeks ago. I invite you to the discussion since you edited the article. --George Ho (talk) 18:18, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I noticed you recently made a number of edits on BVI related pages regarding the official name of the Territory. Absolutely agree that the official name is the Virgin Islands, but in this area we do need to be mindful of the policies set out in Wikipedia:COMMONNAME, and in particular the five requirements of:

• Recognizability
• Naturalness
• Precision
• Conciseness
• Consistency

Rightly or wrongly, most people refer to the British Territory as the British Virgin Islands, and a greater section of the world uses "Virgin Islands" without clarification to mean the nearby US Territory. Just to be clear, I don't disagree at all with any of your edits, and I am certainly not criticising, but I am just advocating caution. What I am keen to avoid is half the BVI related articles using the term "British Virgin Islands" and the other half using the truncated "Virgin Islands".
Thanks, and good work!
--Legis (talk - contribs) 13:51, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I see where you're coming from and I'm aware that 'British Virgin Islands' is a much more common name for the territory. I only replaced 'British Virgin Islands' with 'Virgin Islands' whenever I saw 'Governor of the British Virgin Islands', since it is a matter of fact. I've added 'Virgin Islands' to the article about the BVI because it's Wikipedia's convention to mention a country's common name first and then her official name (e. g., 'Singapore, officially the [']Republic of Singapore['], ...'). Douglas the Comeback Kid (talk) 14:03, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked for a discussion to look at the possibility of moving the category Category:Governors of Nanyo to Category:Governors of the South Pacific Mandate. As you were mentioned in a similar discussion a few years ago at Talk:South Pacific Mandate#Requested move 19 October 2015, you may be interested in contributing to the category move discussion. - Polly Tunnel (talk) 16:33, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you are an ardent advocate for Wade-Giles, Postal Romanization etc. I'm working on the minor geography of China, so I do a lot of work with Hanyu Pinyin. However, I have always hoped that I can also add more information about Wade-Giles and Postal Romanizations for these minor locations in an appropriate way. Please feel free to edit some of my recent contributions to wikipedia or wiktionary in a way that you feel is both compliant with standing policy and informative about the geographical names derived from these romanization schemes, and I will try to learn from your example so that I can include more detailed information about the other romanization schemes in my editing. Geographyinitiative (talk) 11:12, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Resident Evil: Outbreak – File ＃2. Since you had some involvement with the Resident Evil: Outbreak – File ＃2 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:08, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello My name is Omer Benjakob and I am a journalist covering Wikipedia

I wanted to know if you would maybe be willing to talk to me about Wikipedia and Hong Kong for a story I am working on

We can talk privately or via email or WeChat if you prefer - my email is omer.benjakob@haaretz.co.il

Best Omer Benjakob (talk) 10:44, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tagal, Indonesia. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 9#Tagal, Indonesia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:07, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Defined Lines. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 12#Defined Lines until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Dominicmgm (talk) 03:58, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:History of equity and trusts. Hi, I'm trying to improve the article on the history of equity and trusts and noticed you contributed large amounts of it. I just wanted to let you know in case you wanted to comment. All the best. Jtrrs0 (talk) 17:13, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect His Majesty The King has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 7 § His Majesty The King until a consensus is reached. Estar8806 (talk) 22:47, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Her Majesty The Queen has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 7 § Her Majesty The Queen until a consensus is reached. Estar8806 (talk) 22:48, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Ngwa (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:25, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect UNiCeF has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 21 § UNiCeF until a consensus is reached. . Thryduulf (talk) 03:31, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Sdn Bhd has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 18 § Sdn Bhd until a consensus is reached. Isla🏳️‍⚧ 00:50, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]