• 80.194.237.230 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1122 (LTA 1122, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 15:39, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

  FP Izno (talk) 16:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

• 69.77.185.127 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – WP:PROXY. tgeorgescu (talk) 19:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 1 item

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 34 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 3 items

Requested RD1 redactions – 24 items

Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently

• SoHighSchool (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "role account?" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:10, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

   Note on file Usernames containing this string are often role accounts - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 19:10, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared.

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

• Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: High level Ip vandalism and many unsourced edits. Sush150 (talk) 16:23, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

• Bigg Boss (Tamil TV series) season 8 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Bigg Boss (Tamil TV series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP editors repeatedly adding unsourced names of competitors to articles. Show broadcasts in about a week so the list will be known by then, but it's pure guesswork and speculation without any sources supporting. Ravensfire (talk) 17:09, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

• Adding Bigg Boss (Tamil TV series) for the same problems, often from the editors. Ravensfire (talk) 21:56, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

• 2025 Indian Premier League (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – User:Mosalman786 (semi-confirmed user) has been adding spam links to external sites. Look like an account used only for link-spamming. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 17:31, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Now there's an IP keeps changing the number of matches against the given source... Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 05:00, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

+1 Multiple IPs disruptive editing now. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 12:31, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

• Ein Feshkha (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: WP:PIA-related article with recent contentious IP edit Vyvagaba (talk) 20:59, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

• The Mask of Zorro (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper keeps edit warring for no reason. An increase in protection seems necessary to avoid any further disruption. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:35, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

• Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:35, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

• Genshin Impact (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Untamed1910 (talk) 23:22, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

• Pesto (penguin) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 00:44, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

• Thirty-seventh government of Israel (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 04:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

• 2014 AFL Grand Final (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: persistent vandalism (scores/result have been altered on multiple occasions) Electricmaster (talk) 07:28, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

• The Struggle Pakistan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism, The someone from different IP addresses keep on deleting the text without any reference or data. Umar shahid (talk) 09:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

• Gary Brabham (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Continued vandalism from a variety of IP addresses. DH85868993 (talk) 09:36, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

• John 5 (guitarist) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TyMega. HorrorLover555 (talk) 10:40, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

• Andrew Western (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Hauntbug (talk) 12:16, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

• Automated comment: @Hauntbug: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:29, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

• Adam Berdichevsky (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:CT/A-I. Pachu Kannan (talk) 12:30, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

• Avantibai (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Caste based disruption and socking [1][2]. Ratnahastin (talk) 13:30, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:GS/CASTE. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:34, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

• Shigeru Ishiba (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several LTAs and vandal disruptions from Sept.27. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 13:43, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:15, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

• John Albers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: sustained IP vandalism, seemingly connected with anti-gun political group/activism. Alyo (chat·edits) 14:18, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/AP. @Alyo: Please submit a new request if semi-protection isn't sufficient. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:23, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Also note the previous issue of an IP editor claiming to be the article's subject editing the article. So this protection would help with that matter as well, in case that person comes back under a different IP. Stefen 𝕋ower_{s among the rest!} ^{Gab • Gruntwerk} 18:43, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

• Indian Posse (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism as of late. A.S. Brown (talk) 17:11, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:54, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

• Manitoba Warriors (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: High levels of IP vandalism. A.S. Brown (talk) 17:12, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:54, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

• 2024 Jaffa shooting (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 18:12, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

• 29 September 2024 Israeli attacks on Yemen (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:CT/A-I. Pachu Kannan (talk) 18:13, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

• John Amos (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: He died today and IPs are having a field day changing his date of death. Erpert ^{blah, blah, blah...} 18:43, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:50, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

• Simone Biles (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:10, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

• To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
• Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
• Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
• If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

• Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
• Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
• Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
• If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
• This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

• GnocchiFan (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

GnocchiFan has made 5,000+ edits this year alone including seven Good Articles. They make extensive use of WMF Library to improve sourcing and prose. I believe they are both an excellent editor and also communicator, evident at sensitive article topics at 1984 anti-Sikh riots and Gender and sexual minorities in the Ottoman Empire. In short, let's reduce NPP backlog by giving them auto-patrolled status. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:11, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Also worth mentioning GnocchiFan created 84 non redirect articles. One article was deleted Sophie Ottaway 8-months ago. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:25, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

• Benmite (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Seems to be an experienced content creator whose creations are no longer in need of input from NPP. They don't have a clean record of their articles being kept at AfD, but the last deletion was a year and half and 60 articles ago, and looking through a random sampling of their work since then doesn't reveal any major issues. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:50, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

• Greeneyed soul (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Meets minimum criteria, only one article out of many created has been deleted (in 2015). Mach61 23:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

• Nayyn (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Created 55 articles, none of which were deleted, including BLPs. I believe granting the AP flag to this editor will benefit NPP reviewers by reducing the backlog. GrabUp - Talk 16:00, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

• Trailblazer101 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I am requesting file mover rights because I have experience in handling and maintaining various file types and I believe my contributions to several files and my various file rename requests as seen in the editing history here showcase my understanding of the naming policy for files. File names are often a decent part of my contributions with film and television-related articles, and carrying out these renames to satisfy naming conventions rather than having to request them every time a file needs to be renamed would prove beneficial in their up-keeping. Trailblazer101 (talk) 01:41, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 01:24, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

• Skitash (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I often move poorly-titled pages to more appropriate titles, usually to make them more WP:CONCISE, specific, neutral, or to correct spelling and transliterations. I also revert undiscussed moves in line with WP:RMUM. I would greatly appreciate having the ability to manage this myself. Skitash (talk) 21:43, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

• Nuvolet (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I'd like to get this right to delete unnecessary redirects (i.e. move pages over existing single revision redirects regardless of target). Additionally, I would also like to try to harmonize some pages of Spanish municipalities with the name of the province (when necessary) instead of other subnational units (such as comarca). Moreover if a double denomination exists in some cases, I shall use the slash with spaces in between to enhance visual effect of different linguistic nomenclatures. However if an English form is more relevant I shall use it instead of double and local denominations. Other than that I could help elsewhere to move pages if necessary. Thank you, Nuvolet (talk)

• Tvfunhouse (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I have reviewed the criteria for receiving this permission, and feel my contribution history demonstrates an adequate knowledge of creating, expanding, and patrolling articles in accordance to Wikipedia policies. Tvfunhouse (talk) 00:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

• Aliy Dawut (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Hello hello, I have been a Wikipedian for well over 4 months now, and I feel that I have learned a great many things about the site in terms of editing, content, policies, and conduct that I could have never imagined beforehand. If given this right, I humbly commit to using it to the utmost competent and fair / legitimate nature that I possibly can. Thank you Aliy Dawut (talk) 02:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

• HypeBoy (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I have been contributing to pages for three years now, with prior experience in patrolling edit filter log. I would like to get reviewer rights so I can contribute to Wikipedia in more ways than I am able to, presently, and help with the backlog. Since my last request in July, I've been making a track record of communicating collegially with other editors, in my talk page and elsewhere. I hope you'll consider me. Thank you. — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 23:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([3]). — MusikBot ^talk 23:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

• DM5Pedia (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I've been doing RC Patrolling (as a part of Anti-Vandalism) on Wikipedia for a while now, and I think that having the Pending Changes reviewer permission could be a good idea - there have been numerous instances involving a pending changes edit that I look at while looking through Special:RecentChanges that i wanted to accept/deny/etc, and i feel that this permission would be beneficial for my efficeincy. DM5Pedia 04:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

• Legendbird (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Hi! I believe that I'd be a good Pending Changes Reviewer, as I have a good amount of time on my hands, and can do monotonous tasks, like denying obvious vandalism, and the like. I meet, what I believe are all the requirements for this right, and humbly ask to receive this privilege. Thanks in advance! Legendbird (talk) 09:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

• Cactinites (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I am an Wikipedian for more than three years and part of various wikiprojects I need permission to expand my works on Wikipedia and also to observe Wikipedia articles. Cactinites (talk) 15:28, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

• BerryForPerpetuity (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I have been reviewing semi-protected, extended-protected, and COI edit requests for about a month, and having the right to review pending changes would allow me to extend my reach in this topic. I have also been countering vandalism for 5 months, and I have the rollback right. — BerryForPerpetuity (talk) 07:50, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 01:19, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

• PEPSI697 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I have been patrolling recent changes since 8 August 2024 and reverting edits there too. I would like to get the Pending Changes reviewers rights because I sometimes come across constructive edits and would like to accept them (if constructive). So it'll be good if I got those rights. I think I'll also be a good Pending changes reviewer too. PEPSI697 (💬 • 📝) 05:59, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

 Not done for the same reasons that your rollback request was declined. Elli (talk | contribs) 01:22, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

• Charliehdb (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I have been working to revert vandalism for some time now, mostly patrolling Recent changes. I have used Twinkle and RedWarn to revert vandalism and warn vandals. Rollback rights would make it easier for me to revert obvious vandalism. Thanks. Charliehdb (talk) 10:57, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 08:27, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

@Fastily: Thanks for pointing it out. I assure you that I will warn all vandals from now on. I hope you give me Rollback rights. Thanks. Charliehdb (talk) 12:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Please ensure that you are always leaving warnings. I can't stress enough the importance of not biting the newcomers; if you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. Moving forward, could you please make a promise to leave warnings/notifications for every revert? -Fastily 01:08, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

@Fastily: Offcourse, I will leave warnings/notifications for every revert. Charliehdb (talk) 13:39, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

• PEPSI697 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I have been reverting edits and warning users by patrolling recent changes for almost two months now. I have been using Twinkle to revert edits but manually warned users. I have consistently warned users most of the time after reverting their edits. I have been patrolling recent changes since 8 August 2024. I think getting Rollback rights would make it easier to revert edits or vandalism. Thank you. PEPSI697 (💬 • 📝) 05:49, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 08:27, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

@Fastily: Thank you for the response, I promise to consistently warn users after reverting edits. Please also check the tags that I use Twinkle to revert edits as well. Thank you. PEPSI697 (💬 • 📝) 13:00, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

 Not done I'm truly unimpressed by this. You should know better than that, given how long you've been editing. Rollback is an elevated permission that is only granted to editors with a good understanding of our policies/guidelines. Based on your actions today, I'm not convinced you meet this bar. -Fastily 01:08, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

• Cooldudeseven7 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Reason for requesting rollback rights: I have achieved 200 mainspace edits and I am ready to be on Wikipedia's Anti-Vandal task force! I can use tools like AntiVandal, and of course continue to use Twinkle and Ultraviolet. I love patrolling Recent Changes and cant wait to join this exciting opportunity! Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 14:48, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([4]). — MusikBot ^talk 14:50, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

 Not done You've only made a handful of reverts since your previous request was declined. I'm sorry, but that's just not enough experience for me to determine whether you'll be able to use the right appropriately. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 01:08, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, I will see this page in about a month or so. Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 11:27, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

• P199 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I already work on templates from time to time, to improve formatting, fix links, add features, etc. My record speaks for itself that I am careful in making changes. Thanks. P 1 9 9  ✉ 13:27, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Standard Guidelines review:

1. Y (guideline: >1 year, applicant: 18)
2. Y (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~55k)
3. Y (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: ~1000)
4. Y (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: 8 years)
5. N (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: ~1 (other sandboxes were edited before protection enabled)
6. N (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: 0)

Primefac (talk) 14:57, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

@Primefac: My "need for the right, as well as a familiarity with the care and responsibility required" is proven by my overall record and experience with WP, not necessarily meeting an arbitrary guideline limit. Thanks. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:23, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

I made no claims about your need, or lack thereof. I was simply filling out the standard guideline review. Primefac (talk) 15:36, 26 September 2024 (UTC)