No vandalism since final warning. Re-report if this user resumes vandalising. The edit that led to that final warning is the last edit they've made. Daniel Case (talk) 20:34, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:00, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
This username matched "clinton|hillary|hilary|trump|drumpf|biden|obama|kamala" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:00, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Note on file possible reference to former or current U.S. president, VP, or candidate - please review -- DQB (owner / report) 17:00, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:20, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:20, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
Requests for page protection
This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared.
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Indefinite semi-protection: High level of vandalism , changing of name & entering of pin-codes by unregistered users. Maheep Singh24 (talk) 10:54, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:50, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection:BLP policy violations – IP editing to reinsert contentious material which has no secondary sourcing. Only sourced by WP:BLPPRIMARY. TarnishedPathtalk 13:58, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: A lot of vandalism, the article gets changed from “P. Diddy’s Starmaker to P. Diddy’s sex toys and baby oil. He is a controversial subject Wcamp9 (talk) 14:07, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing and repeated IP/new user vandalism re-ensuing after the end of a previous page protection. ser!(chat to me - see my edits) 15:11, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Well, IP users have recently been making a series of unnecessary grammatical fixes which have become difficult to navigate in the event of multiple edits by such users. Hence, seeking protection for this page. MSincccc (talk) 15:44, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes: Page may be prone to vandalism as the figures are very popular at the moment. Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 15:54, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of incorrect/unsuitable image by an IP editor who refuses to engage on article talk page. 10mmsocket (talk) 16:17, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is likely to get vandalised persistently as long as the 2023-2024 Manipur violence continues. Kautilya3 (talk) 19:12, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Former pastor who confessed to sexual abuse. The man himself may not deserve protection, but his page does, as it has recently suffered a fair bit of the sort of emotionally charged edit-warring that would be expected in this situation. — HelpMyUnbelief (talk) 20:44, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Contestant progress table for a currently airing television series is repeatedly being edited to add spoilers/results of unaired episodes—sometimes by anonymous IPs, sometimes by named users. needs protection to prevent this content (which is unsourced, as it cites episodes that have not aired) from being added. Griffindaly (talk) 22:34, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:08, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Sock puppet vandalism. Politically contentious figure in upcoming election. Perhaps protect until the election on October 19 to reduce low quality edits. Deathying (talk) 23:48, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Three years ago, this page was extended-confirmed protected due to an edit war. I talked to the protecting admin and stated that there is zero chance for him to unprotect the article. Would consider downgrading the protection to semi. ScarletViolettc 11:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Comment: For some clarification, since I found this to be a little confusing, here's the link to their discussion. Zinnober9 (talk) 18:31, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
I would like to request that... Updating the image and description below because Th3 3ra is now complete. Time for changes. Bnika33 (talk) 18:58, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
GnocchiFan has made 5,000+ edits this year alone including seven Good Articles. They make extensive use of WMF Library to improve sourcing and prose. I believe they are both an excellent editor and also communicator, evident at sensitive article topics at 1984 anti-Sikh riots and Gender and sexual minorities in the Ottoman Empire. In short, let's reduce NPP backlog by giving them auto-patrolled status. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:11, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Also worth mentioning GnocchiFan created 84 non redirect articles. One article was deletedSophie Ottaway 8-months ago. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:25, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Y X's Tools is only finding 4 GAs. But regardless, done...--v/r - TP 19:24, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
@TParis: I was just taking a look at this when you accepted the request, but I have my concerns here. The single source tags on Martha Bohachevsky-Chomiak and Elizabeth Neesom are valid, and Elisabeth Nilsson (lawyer) doesn't demonstrate the subject's notability very well. They have some very good-looking articles, but I feel that the basis of quality for their creations needs to be a bit higher before they're ready for the autopatrolled flag. Courtesy ping for GnocchiFan; I hope this feedback is useful for your writing in the future. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 19:36, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
I agree – those are valid concerns. I've removed the flag. Schwede66 20:20, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
(eyeroll) Guess we just revert other admins actions without discussing it first, now.--v/r - TP 20:29, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
I don't really hold the same reservations that you do. There is a systematic bias against covering women in history and it's even greater outside of western media. There has been an effort to increase coverage of women and I feel these two articles are geared towards that goal. It's easy to write an internet article about a living person that recently does a thing and get it published. It only costs bits and bytes. But sources existing in the early 20th century or earlier, about women, when publishing was costlier rings stronger with regards to GNG than a single article on the internet. Overall, I'm confident this user will create encyclopedic content without significant errors. None of us are error free.--v/r - TP 20:27, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([6]). — MusikBottalk 20:20, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Seems to be an experienced content creator whose creations are no longer in need of input from NPP. They don't have a clean record of their articles being kept at AfD, but the last deletion was a year and half and 60 articles ago, and looking through a random sampling of their work since then doesn't reveal any major issues. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:50, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Created 55 articles, none of which were deleted, including BLPs. I believe granting the AP flag to this editor will benefit NPP reviewers by reducing the backlog. GrabUp - Talk 16:00, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Your recent creations of lists of minor planets is automated, right? Is there a bot request or other prior consensus somewhere for it somewhere? – Joe (talk) 11:57, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Manual prep with machine assistance & manual corrections. It's not possible to make them without some sort of assistance, which has been the case since 2004, with Curps > Urhixidur > Rfassbind > me, off the top of my head. ~Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 12:10, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Thanks. Done on the understanding that the planet lists are uncontroversial. – Joe (talk) 12:16, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
I saw my username on the Wikipedia database reports and found out I was eligible for the autopatrolled privilege. I've made lots of articles about Indian politicians recently and will continue to do so in the future. I'm a trusted user with lots of rights including NPP and fully familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I also have the redirect autopatrol pseudoright, and I'd like to request the autopatrolled right in order to reduce the reviewing workload of new page patrollers. Thank you, Waqar💬 20:02, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
I have almost 25,000 edits, of which 98.9% are still live and have created 49 articles of which only one has been deleted, and that was a naming error on my part. I am a member of New Page Patrol as of September 2024. I am familiar with Wikipedia guidelines for both creation and deletion of articles. I would like to request autopatrol rights. Demt1298 (talk) 15:13, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Done, thank you for your contributions. – Joe (talk) 12:17, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
I am requesting autopatrol rights as I have been an active contributor since my account was unblocked. During this time, I have created multiple articles that adhere to Wikipedia's content policies and guidelines. My contributions focus on history and education, and I take care to ensure thorough referencing and proper formatting in every article.
I believe autopatrol rights would help reduce the workload for patrollers, as my work consistently meets Wikipedia's standards. I would appreciate your consideration of this request. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 17:00, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
I'm sorry but the UPE concerns raised last year will disqualify you from this permission for the foreseeable future. Not done. – Joe (talk) 12:20, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
@Joe Roe: My account was compromised. I didn't violate any policy of the Wikipedia since registered on this website. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 12:28, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Okay, but a) I have no way to confirm this (maybe @Xaosflux: can help with this?) and b) this is a sensitive right when it comes to UPE, I'm not sure we should be taking the risk of it happening again. – Joe (talk) 12:41, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
While not definitive, a potential account compromise does seem to have occurred between August and September of 2023. As it has been a year since then, if no new concerns have been raised since then I suggest this request be evaluated based on the article creations since then. — xaosfluxTalk 15:08, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Would find this very useful for tedious/repetitive edits. Thanks! Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 15:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Such as... ? Primefac (talk) 13:13, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
@Primefac, for tasks such as changing dates to be consistent in an article or doing citation cleanup when I'm reviewing AfCs and NPPs. Thanks for the consideration! Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 15:51, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
@Cocobb8, importScript('User:Ohconfucius/script/MOSNUM dates.js'); ''// Backlink: [[User:Ohconfucius/script/MOSNUM dates.js]]'' this could help? Best, Reading Beans 15:59, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
@Reading Beans Yes it would, but that was just en example. I also take part in the Wikipedia Unreferenced Articles project and often find very similar articles that need the same edit done to multiple of them, which is also why I'd find AWB beneficial. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 15:33, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
I've been asked to create talk pages (linking to wikiprojects) for category pages which I have created. This would be easy with AWB (there are a lot of them). Perspicax (talk) 13:37, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
I think (as suggested on your talk page) rater might be a better tool for this. Primefac (talk) 13:17, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to keep using AutoWikiBrowser to better add WikiProjects to talk pages in other languages, such as those in the Vietnamese versions of Establishments in Italy by year, as well as fixing (not necessarily removing like before) unknown parameters in templates. OpalYosutebito (talk) 13:22, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([7]). — MusikBottalk 13:30, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
I would love to use this for category maintenance and WikiProject tagging across a wide spread of articles quickly. (Oinkers42) (talk) 22:21, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
The reason i wanted to ask to be confimed is that i was on the MF DOOM page and noticed that his name wasnt capitlized, he has stated many times in songs and other media that his name is spelled with "all caps", eventhis spotify page is capitlized so i was planning on correcting it but needed to either be autoconfimed or confirmed and i am sending this request for that reason. Mlsfcx (talk) 11:58, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Not done – Hi, and thank you for creating an account to edit Wikipedia. Although I fully understand your desire to dive right in, many of our articles are semi-protected because they are controversial, prone to vandalism, or other reasons. As a new editor with few edits, it might be wise to discuss your edits on the article talkpage in order to gain consensus for your edits, and then use {{Edit semi-protected}} to request the edit be performed. I only recommend this until you are used to the challenges of reliable sources, the biographies of living persons policy, and other similar policies. The good news is that fewer than 5 percent of Wikipedia articles are protected; this means that more than 95 percent of the articles can use your help right now! stwalkerster (talk) 12:47, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the extended confirmed flag.
Extended confirmed
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag.
Event coordinator
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag.
File mover
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
I would like to request my NPP temporary approval be made permanent. It is currently set to expire on October 3. I initially requested this level of access to learn more about Wikipedia as a whole and take part in the September backlog drive. With the extended access I have learned more about the use of the Twinkle gadget and have requested notification access to article alerts for WikiProjects I participate in. I have worked to increase my participation in AFD and AFC. I have also used the CSD process for articles that meet the speedy deletion guidelines. I have began use of the copyvio process for evaluating pages and started adding links to foreign language articles about the same subject. I have enjoyed the work I have done during this time and hope to be able to continue to help my fellow editors grow knowledge on Wikipedia. Demt1298 (talk) 13:09, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by HJ Mitchell (expires 00:00, 4 October 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBottalk 14:50, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Done, I think your reviews of sports seasons and leagues err a bit on the lenient side, but I'm satisfied that the template tagging and AfD work you have done demonstrate a knowledge of the relevant guidelines. signed, Rosguilltalk 14:07, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Requesting for renewal of permissions after being given a two-month trial by Rosguill. Rosguill's feedback was very helpful, and this time around I have been very careful with reviewing new pages, making sure that the only ones that are reviewed are properly sourced, non-promotional articles, while problematic new pages are draftified or nominated for deletion with care. Florificapis (talk) 08:17, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 20 October 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBottalk 08:20, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Donesigned, Rosguilltalk 18:37, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Hi, requesting to see if my permissions can be extended so that I can continue to help out. I enjoyed dabbling in this through the Sept NPP drive and definitely learned some things and would like to continue to do. Thinking of also pairing this by contributing in AFD and AFC as well. Thanks. Eucalyptusmint (talk) 01:37, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by HJ Mitchell (expires 00:00, 4 October 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBottalk 01:40, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Donesigned, Rosguilltalk 18:40, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Recently received temporary NPR rights for the backlog drive, and believe my trial period went quite well, so I'm requesting them be made permanent so I can continue reviewing articles. Thanks, Lordseriouspig 09:09, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by HJ Mitchell (expires 00:00, 4 October 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBottalk 09:10, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Extending the trial for another month--most of the reviews look ok, but there were relatively few article reviews among the redirects, and I think some of the biographies (e.g. Rick Bisio) fell short of the mark Donesigned, Rosguilltalk 18:51, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
I have been a registered user on Wikipedia for several years, with over 500 undeleted mainspace edits. I possess a strong understanding of content policies and guidelines, supported by my experience in quality control processes. I have actively participated in deletion processes like AfD, PROD, and CSD, contributed to Articles for Creation, and written new articles.
I maintain a solid track record of interacting civilly and constructively with other editors, especially newcomers. I have no active behavioral blocks or 3RR violations within the last 6 months, and I am committed to reviewing pages solely on a volunteer basis. Imad_J (talk) 13:26, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
عماد الدين المقدسي, could you comment on your creation of Tyrone Smith (musician) in 2020? While old substandard articles are not automatically disqualifying for this permission, between the lack of extensive article creations since then (or even just edits on en.wiki in general since then), and the fact that the article has been repeatedly recreated and deleted via WP:A7, it does raise some concern. signed, Rosguilltalk 18:56, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
I was given a 3-month trial which will expire on October 10 and I would like to continue reviewing new articles and redirects. Note: I recently participated in September 2024 NPP backlog drive. Pinging Ganesha811 who said to ping them when my trial is about to expire. — YoungForever(talk) 18:18, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Ganesha811 (expires 19:40, 10 October 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBottalk 18:20, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Done Trial seems to have gone smoothly, one issue raised on talk, but not too significant. Happy editing! —Ganesha811 (talk) 19:44, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request temporary NPR rights. After reviewing the criteria, I believe I meet the necessary requirements. Could you please confirm if I am eligible?
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
I often move poorly-titled pages to more appropriate titles, usually to make them more WP:CONCISE, specific, neutral, or to correct spelling and transliterations. I also revert undiscussed moves in line with WP:RMUM. I would greatly appreciate having the ability to manage this myself. Skitash (talk) 21:43, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to get this right to delete unnecessary redirects (i.e. move pages over existing single revision redirects regardless of target). Additionally, I would also like to try to harmonize some pages of Spanish municipalities with the name of the province (when necessary) instead of other subnational units (such as comarca). Moreover if a double denomination exists in some cases, I shall use the slash with spaces in between to enhance visual effect of different linguistic nomenclatures. However if an English form is more relevant I shall use it instead of double and local denominations. Other than that I could help elsewhere to move pages if necessary. Thank you, Nuvolet (talk)
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Hello hello, I have been a Wikipedian for well over 4 months now, and I feel that I have learned a great many things about the site in terms of editing, content, policies, and conduct that I could have never imagined beforehand. If given this right, I humbly commit to using it to the utmost competent and fair / legitimate nature that I possibly can. Thank you Aliy Dawut (talk) 02:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
I have been contributing to pages for three years now, with prior experience in patrolling edit filter log. I would like to get reviewer rights so I can contribute to Wikipedia in more ways than I am able to, presently, and help with the backlog. Since my last request in July, I've been making a track record of communicating collegially with other editors, in my talk page and elsewhere. I hope you'll consider me. Thank you. — hhypeboyh💬 • ✏️ 23:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([8]). — MusikBottalk 23:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
I've been doing RC Patrolling (as a part of Anti-Vandalism) on Wikipedia for a while now, and I think that having the Pending Changes reviewer permission could be a good idea - there have been numerous instances involving a pending changes edit that I look at while looking through Special:RecentChanges that i wanted to accept/deny/etc, and i feel that this permission would be beneficial for my efficeincy. DM5Pedia 04:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi! I believe that I'd be a good Pending Changes Reviewer, as I have a good amount of time on my hands, and can do monotonous tasks, like denying obvious vandalism, and the like. I meet, what I believe are all the requirements for this right, and humbly ask to receive this privilege. Thanks in advance! Legendbird (talk) 09:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I am an Wikipedian for more than three years and part of various wikiprojects I need permission to expand my works on Wikipedia and also to observe Wikipedia articles. Cactinites (talk) 15:28, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
I've been editing since 2015 and primarily work on articles related to politics and history. I have experience with reverting vandalism, verifying content complies with policies like V, NPOV and BLP, and I think I can help maintain the quality of articles like those in my watchlist by reviewing pending changes, which I've successfully requested for pages at RPP multiple times in the past, including in August 2021, May 2023, this January and thisAugust. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk·contribs·email) 22:07, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Hi! I've been using Wikipedia on-and-off since 2020, but I'm starting to become more active. I'd like to become a pending change reviewer, as I've often wanted to help out but have struggled finding where I can actually contribute, and I think this is a good place to contribute. I'm familiar with the guidelines, as well. Thx56 (talk) 21:28, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has 56 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBottalk 21:30, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
I have been working to revert vandalism for some time now, mostly patrolling Recent changes. I have used Twinkle and RedWarn to revert vandalism and warn vandals. Rollback rights would make it easier for me to revert obvious vandalism. Thanks. Charliehdb (talk) 10:57, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 08:27, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
@Fastily: Thanks for pointing it out. I assure you that I will warn all vandals from now on. I hope you give me Rollback rights. Thanks. Charliehdb (talk) 12:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Please ensure that you are always leaving warnings. I can't stress enough the importance of notbiting the newcomers; if you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. Moving forward, could you please make a promise to leave warnings/notifications for every revert? -Fastily 01:08, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
@Fastily: Offcourse, I will leave warnings/notifications for every revert. Charliehdb (talk) 13:39, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Great, thanks for confirming. I'm also a bit concerned by your recent block for edit warring. How have you learned from this experience, and in your own words, can you explain why your actions leading up to the block were inappropriate? Also, courtesy ping for @Bbb23 -Fastily 20:29, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
I don't think Charlie is ready for rollback. Besides responding to your request for an explanation, I think they should wait until they have a better track record, including not edit-warring and giving people warnings.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:55, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
@Fastily: I was blocked on 5 July 2024, due to edit warring. But after that, I have learned more about wikipedia policies. As you can see, in my recent contributions I haven't been in any edit warring and was notifying the users about the reverts. Thanks. Charliehdb (talk) 03:09, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
I already work on templates from time to time, to improve formatting, fix links, add features, etc. My record speaks for itself that I am careful in making changes. Thanks. P 1 9 9✉ 13:27, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
@Primefac: My "need for the right, as well as a familiarity with the care and responsibility required" is proven by my overall record and experience with WP, not necessarily meeting an arbitrary guideline limit. Thanks. -- P 1 9 9✉ 15:23, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
I made no claims about your need, or lack thereof. I was simply filling out the standard guideline review. Primefac (talk) 15:36, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at Waters http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Calmer Waters.