This template is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
Given there is no funding commitment nor sources that confirm any of the proposed roughed-in stations will ever be built, they have been removed. Mention of them is still present in the main article Canada Line but this diagram should represent the present state of the service. This is a different situation from the early inclusion of the Evergreen Extension stations on the Millennium Line in various diagrams as those were fully funded/construction had begun when they were added, and there are many official primary sources that reflect the fact these stations will enter service.
Similar situation with the two new proposed B-Line services that intersect the Canada Line: when they begin service, they can be added—until that point, including them makes the diagram inaccurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeyconnick (talk • contribs) 21:38, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I agree about the proposed B-Line bus services, but if the stations are roughed-in with some structural elements, then the do belong on the diagram. Useddenim (talk) 01:20, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Is there precedence for that? I feel like these are primarily service diagrams, not engineering/physical ones, and so they should represent what is actually used by customers/users or what is known to be there in the future (funded with construction having begun). Future stations that may never exist seem like a stretch to include, especially when they are already mentioned in the main article. Joeyconnick (talk) 04:29, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
