Talk:Fiat Croma

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Automobiles Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Brands This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

it would be better to create a new entry for the 2005 model because it is not the direct heir of the first, and there are 20 years of difference between the first and second series and are two different types of machine.--Pava (talk) 09:19, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Was the TDi (turbo diesel) introduced in calendar year 1986 or 1987? Many car review websites say 1986 (eg http://www.carfolio.com/specifications/models/car/?car=2794 , http://www.autoevolution.com/cars/fiat-croma-1986.html ). Fiat's own site says 1987 (http://www.fiat.com/com/air-technologies - click on Heritage) but it is not clear if they are using calendar years (ie 1987 means Aug 1987 to Aug 1988) or US style model years (ie 1987 means Aug 1986 to Aug 1987).  Stepho  talk 

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fiat Croma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120311215248/http://www.classicandperformancecar.com/front_website/octane_interact/carspecs.php/?see=4015 to http://www.classicandperformancecar.com/front_website/octane_interact/carspecs.php/?see=4015
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110526114847/http://www.eurocarblog.com:80/post/4128/fiat-freemont-to-sell-40000-and-change-the-fiat-image to http://www.eurocarblog.com/post/4128/fiat-freemont-to-sell-40000-and-change-the-fiat-image

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:21, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]