User contributions for 209.93.141.17

17:3917:39, 26 November 2017 diff hist +9 Zack Knight →Career
17:3717:37, 26 November 2017 diff hist +30 Zack Knight →Career
17:3617:36, 26 November 2017 diff hist −6 Zack Knight →Singles
17:3517:35, 26 November 2017 diff hist +8 Zack Knight →Singles

00:3300:33, 26 September 2017 diff hist +203 Talk:38628 Huya →Problems with Russian pronunciation
00:3100:31, 26 September 2017 diff hist +120 Talk:38628 Huya →size discrepancy...
00:2300:23, 26 September 2017 diff hist +167 Talk:38628 Huya →size discrepancy...
00:2100:21, 26 September 2017 diff hist +430 Talk:38628 Huya →size discrepancy...: new section

06:2906:29, 25 September 2017 diff hist +481 Talk:List of possible dwarf planets →Brightness table
06:2706:27, 25 September 2017 diff hist +644 Talk:List of possible dwarf planets →reorder by measured diameter?
06:2306:23, 25 September 2017 diff hist +114 Talk:List of possible dwarf planets →Lower limit?
06:2206:22, 25 September 2017 diff hist +2,134 Talk:List of possible dwarf planets →Lower limit?
06:0806:08, 25 September 2017 diff hist +1,164 Talk:List of possible dwarf planets →Table Update
05:4105:41, 25 September 2017 diff hist +17 2060 Chiron There's obviously a ton of work gone into this, so why did you dump all those sizes under "dimensions" without any indication of whether they were diameter or radius, and occasionally pick a suboptimal figure from the linked sources? Anyway, FTFY...
04:5504:55, 25 September 2017 diff hist −8 Makemake →Satellite: getting tired of radius vs diameter nonsense. "Dimensions" are w*h*d type measurements; putting a single figure there confuses matters. Main text has "175km diameter", sizes in sidebars tend to be radii... also where did "250km" come from?
03:4503:45, 25 September 2017 diff hist +40 (66063) 1998 RO1 and why not throw in some kerning-neatening thin nbsp's just to be a fancy-pants too :)
03:4203:42, 25 September 2017 diff hist −1 (66063) 1998 RO1 having said that ... in for a penny, in for a pound. and in fact, the previous edit summary just made me realise I may as well switch two characters and have everything expressed in standard kg-m-s units.
03:4003:40, 25 September 2017 diff hist +24 (66063) 1998 RO1 I feel kinda bad doing this one, as I can see why you wrote it that way, but still - gravity is in m/s^2, not mm/s^2, even if really small. That's what the already once-abused standard form is for. (But weirdly g/cm^3 IS standard and 1 directly = 1kg/m^3)
03:3603:36, 25 September 2017 diff hist −15 (66063) 1998 RO1 notwithstanding that the correct form for tonnes would be "t" or just "tonne(s)", with "mt" suggesting either an erroneously uncapitalised megatonne or a weird millitonne (ie, 1kg), the standard mass unit used for all these infoboxes is the kilogramme.
03:0103:01, 25 September 2017 diff hist −1 Talk:3753 Cruithne →Orbiting Lagrangian point L4? Oh no, it's not!
03:0003:00, 25 September 2017 diff hist +495 Talk:3753 Cruithne →Orbiting Lagrangian point L4? Oh no, it's not!
02:5402:54, 25 September 2017 diff hist +225 Talk:3753 Cruithne →Quasi-satellite or not?
02:5302:53, 25 September 2017 diff hist +1,881 Talk:3753 Cruithne →Orbiting Lagrangian point L4? Oh no, it's not!
02:4002:40, 25 September 2017 diff hist +1,162 Talk:(419624) 2010 SO16 →Quasi-satellite
02:1102:11, 25 September 2017 diff hist −11 Moons of Haumea →Orbital characteristics: ok, bad enough that the mass scaling for major planets' moons jumps between 10^15, 10^16 and 10^18kg somewhat arbitrarily, making comparisons hard, but choosing 10^21 is completely absurd and misses the point of Standard Form
02:0602:06, 25 September 2017 diff hist +1,377 Talk:Hydra (moon) →Another pretty much meaningless mass figure: new section
01:5201:52, 25 September 2017 diff hist +5 Talk:Nix (moon) →Date format
01:5201:52, 25 September 2017 diff hist +3,059 Talk:Nix (moon) →Date format
01:3101:31, 25 September 2017 diff hist +682 Talk:Nix (moon) →mass
01:0401:04, 25 September 2017 diff hist −12 Triton (moon) actually looks like that part was altered from cromulent english into that babble, so I've fixed it back to how it was, and the later also-fiddled part to a hybrid which is both valid but clear ("relatively young" is AOK, but "sparse" is a bit techie)
01:0001:00, 25 September 2017 diff hist −2 Triton (moon) we am spekeing the english well good isnt us
00:2400:24, 25 September 2017 diff hist +275 Talk:Galatea (moon) →Geological activity
00:1500:15, 25 September 2017 diff hist +962 Talk:Naiad (moon) →Gone missing

23:4223:42, 24 September 2017 diff hist +71 Talk:Mab (moon) No edit summary
23:3923:39, 24 September 2017 diff hist +375 Talk:Mab (moon) No edit summary
23:3623:36, 24 September 2017 diff hist +460 Talk:Mab (moon) →Radius vs Diameter... AGAIN
23:3123:31, 24 September 2017 diff hist +254 Talk:Mab (moon) →Radius vs Diameter... AGAIN
23:2923:29, 24 September 2017 diff hist +880 Talk:Mab (moon) →Radius vs Diameter... AGAIN: new section
23:1523:15, 24 September 2017 diff hist +256 Talk:Perdita (moon) →Name
23:1323:13, 24 September 2017 diff hist +320 Talk:Perdita (moon) →Name
23:1123:11, 24 September 2017 diff hist +632 Talk:Perdita (moon) →size weirdness: new section
19:5019:50, 24 September 2017 diff hist +1,790 Talk:Hecatoncheires →In Popular Culture
19:1719:17, 24 September 2017 diff hist +3 Moons of Saturn →Confirmed moons: period, and eccentricity updated too; Expect the details for several other small moons may need researching and correcting as well, but only did this as I noticed it whilst passing through... maybe if everyone does one each?
19:1419:14, 24 September 2017 diff hist −6 Moons of Saturn →Confirmed moons: the data shown here was both in conflict with what was on Anthe's own page and with that documented elsewhere; just found I didn't copy down the orbital period so will edit that as well in a minute or so
19:0919:09, 24 September 2017 diff hist +274 Talk:Anthe (moon) →actual size?
19:0819:08, 24 September 2017 diff hist +1 Anthe (moon) found the correct form for at least some of the tags, let's see if they work.
18:2718:27, 24 September 2017 diff hist +556 Talk:42355 Typhon →minor planet with a large moon, or a binary minor planet?
18:2318:23, 24 September 2017 diff hist +586 Talk:42355 Typhon →minor planet with a large moon, or a binary minor planet?: new section
18:1818:18, 24 September 2017 diff hist +1 Talk:65489 Ceto →Name, "known satellites"...
18:1718:17, 24 September 2017 diff hist +102 Talk:65489 Ceto →Name, "known satellites"...

26 November 2017

26 September 2017

25 September 2017

24 September 2017