Philip Kerr (1) (1956–2018)
Author of Berlin Noir
For other authors named Philip Kerr, see the disambiguation page.
Philip Kerr (1) has been aliased into P. B. Kerr.
About the Author
Image credit: Philip Kerr en 2014
Series
Works by Philip Kerr
Works have been aliased into P. B. Kerr.
The Penguin Book of Fights, Feuds and Heartfelt Hatreds: An Anthology of Antipathy (1992) — Editor — 37 copies, 1 review
Bernard Gunther 1 copy
Reference Points 1 copy
Associated Works
Works have been aliased into P. B. Kerr.
Tagged
Common Knowledge
- Legal name
- Kerr, Philip Ballantyne
- Other names
- Kerr, Philip
- Birthdate
- 1956-02-22
- Date of death
- 2018-03-23
- Gender
- male
- Nationality
- Scotland
UK - Country (for map)
- UK
- Birthplace
- Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
- Place of death
- London, England, UK
- Places of residence
- Cornwall, England, UK
Wimbledon, London, England, UK - Education
- Melville College, Edinburgh
University of Birmingham (BA | 1978 | MA | 1980) - Occupations
- advertising copywriter
journalist
novelist
crime writer
historical novelist - Relationships
- Thynne, Jane (spouse)
- Organizations
- Saatchi & Saatchi
- Awards and honors
- RBA Prize for Crime Writing (2009)
Ellis Peters Historic Crime Award (2009)
Members
Reviews
Lists
Awards
You May Also Like
Associated Authors
Statistics
- Works
- 45
- Also by
- 3
- Members
- 17,860
- Popularity
- #1,231
- Rating
- 3.8
- Reviews
- 639
- ISBNs
- 1,015
- Languages
- 20
- Favorited
- 5
Police Detective Jake manages to place herself at the head of an investigation into the search for a serial killer who hunts other potential killers. Written in 1992 the novel postulates what society and criminal investigation might look like in our current age. Some is spot on some not so much. Both Jake and the killer use criminal profiling in their cat and mouse game but the core method of investigation is, or should have been, philosophy. The killer is obsessed with his idol the philosopher Wittgenstein and kills other killers who's assigned nickname by the criminal database also correspond to philosophers.
What should have been a battle of wits turns instead out to be a battle of wills. The author is so focused on trying to fit philosophy work in the context of crime that the entire endeavor feels forced to say the least. There is much to be enjoyed in this book and I would recommend anyone to read this if only to see the bravado of the author in breaking stereo types and trying out near future predictions. Describing this as a book thought of by Neal Stephenson and executed by William Gibson without directions doesn't feel far from the mark. If there are any gaping plot holes it would have to be things you would think the author knew something about. For example:
Schizophrenia is not the same as Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD).
A sociopath is not someone who suffers from schizophrenia.
There are also incredibly clumsy plot holes that have nothing to do with the technical details of mental illness or philosophy. Quite early on in the novel the police bureau comes up with a good description of the killer and even has a police sketch of his face. As a final touch Jake has an elaborate recording of the killer's voice. However Jake does not instantly recognize the killer after coming in close contact and even speaking with him.… (more)