Alex's Reviews > The Moonstone
The Moonstone
by
by
The Moonstone is known as the first detective novel*, and it's a cracking one. You can see things invented here that were directly borrowed by future writers: Holmes' overconfidence (and his use of London urchins as agents); Agatha Christie's exploration of narrative reliability.
* as opposed to Poe's Dupin, which was the first detective story - I know, we're splitting hairs.
And if the mystery's not enough for you, how about mysterious Oriental cultures? Romance? Quicksand?* Opium? This is a ludicrously entertaining book, almost on the level of Count of Monte Cristo for sheer kicks.
* Things I Was Super On The Watch For When I Was A Kid And It Turns Out They Are Not Actually Things
- Alligators
- Amnesia
- Chloroform-soaked rags
- Razors in apples
- Steamrollers
- Quicksand
It shares with Collins' other masterpiece, The Woman in White, a preoccupation with narrative - from different sources, in different voices, with varying motives and degrees of reliability. Like Woman in White, it's set up like a court case: a series of witnesses come forward to tell their part of the story in more or less chronological order, while commenting on (and insulting) each other's narratives. Many characters also cite other texts: Betteredge is obsessed with Robinson Crusoe; Miss Clack carts around a variety of religious tracts, all of which are made up, which sucks because how badly do you want to read "Satan in the Hairbrush" and "A Word With You On Your Cap Ribbons"? Pretty bad, man - and finally, Ezra Jennings will cite De Quincey's landmark drug memoir Memoirs of an Opium Eater.
Which, by the way: unlike Woman in White (1860), The Moonstone (1868) was written while Collins was deep in the throes of a laudanum addiction, and the whole thing can be seen as, more or less, about opium.
Also unlike Woman in White, which features one of my all-time favorite female heroines, the diamond-sharp Miss Halcombe, The Moonstone has an awkward relationship to women. Many of its narrators are prone to statements like this:
Woman in White just edges out Moonstone for me as my favorite Collins. Its characters - Miss Halcombe and the mighty Count Fosco - are more indelible than Moonstone's. But The Moonstone includes a thinly disguised Richard Burton, as well as the terrifically bitchy Miss Clack...look, here's my secret: I like Collins better than his buddy Dickens. This book is a gang of fun.
* as opposed to Poe's Dupin, which was the first detective story - I know, we're splitting hairs.
And if the mystery's not enough for you, how about mysterious Oriental cultures? Romance? Quicksand?* Opium? This is a ludicrously entertaining book, almost on the level of Count of Monte Cristo for sheer kicks.
* Things I Was Super On The Watch For When I Was A Kid And It Turns Out They Are Not Actually Things
- Alligators
- Amnesia
- Chloroform-soaked rags
- Razors in apples
- Steamrollers
- Quicksand
It shares with Collins' other masterpiece, The Woman in White, a preoccupation with narrative - from different sources, in different voices, with varying motives and degrees of reliability. Like Woman in White, it's set up like a court case: a series of witnesses come forward to tell their part of the story in more or less chronological order, while commenting on (and insulting) each other's narratives. Many characters also cite other texts: Betteredge is obsessed with Robinson Crusoe; Miss Clack carts around a variety of religious tracts, all of which are made up, which sucks because how badly do you want to read "Satan in the Hairbrush" and "A Word With You On Your Cap Ribbons"? Pretty bad, man - and finally, Ezra Jennings will cite De Quincey's landmark drug memoir Memoirs of an Opium Eater.
Which, by the way: unlike Woman in White (1860), The Moonstone (1868) was written while Collins was deep in the throes of a laudanum addiction, and the whole thing can be seen as, more or less, about opium.
Also unlike Woman in White, which features one of my all-time favorite female heroines, the diamond-sharp Miss Halcombe, The Moonstone has an awkward relationship to women. Many of its narrators are prone to statements like this:
"Men (being superior creatures) are bound to improve women - if they can. When a woman wants me to do anything, I always insist on knowing why. The oftener you make them rummage their own minds for a reason, the more manageable you will find them in all the relations of life.The first couple times you see stuff like this you can figure Collins means for you to laugh at it - but after like ten different people say things along similar lines, you do start to wonder a little.
Woman in White just edges out Moonstone for me as my favorite Collins. Its characters - Miss Halcombe and the mighty Count Fosco - are more indelible than Moonstone's. But The Moonstone includes a thinly disguised Richard Burton, as well as the terrifically bitchy Miss Clack...look, here's my secret: I like Collins better than his buddy Dickens. This book is a gang of fun.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The Moonstone.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
May 25, 2014
–
Started Reading
May 29, 2014
– Shelved
May 30, 2014
–
Finished Reading
May 31, 2014
– Shelved as:
2014
January 2, 2015
– Shelved as:
rth-lifetime
Comments Showing 1-16 of 16 (16 new)
date
newest »
message 1:
by
Daniela
(new)
Jun 01, 2014 03:32PM
Hey! If you want to read the really first detective story, read Edgar Allan Poe's "The Murders in the Rue Morgue". He was born in 1809 and died 1849. Wilkie Collins published this book 20 years later. I recommend Edgar A. Poe
reply
|
flag
Have read him! It's a fine point, but this is called the first detective novel. Poe's Dupin stories were short.
For argument's sake, let's say it was Zadig
---------------------
The head huntsman address'd himself to Zadig, and ask'd him, whether he hadn't seen the King's Palfrey run by him.
"No Horse," said Zadig, "ever gallop'd smoother; he is about five Foot high, his Hoofs are very small; his Tail is about three Foot six Inches long; the studs of his Bit are of pure Gold, about 23 Carats; and his Shoes are of Silver, about Eleven penny Weight a-piece."
"What Course did he take, pray, Sir? Whereabouts is he?" said the Huntsman.
"I never sat Eyes on him," reply'd Zadig, "not I, neither did I ever hear before now, that his Majesty had such a Palfrey."
---------------------------------
Zadig proceeds Sherlock-style to explain how he deduced all these facts without seeing the horse, and does the same with the details of a lost dog about which he miraculously deduced a similar array of facts.
---------------------
The head huntsman address'd himself to Zadig, and ask'd him, whether he hadn't seen the King's Palfrey run by him.
"No Horse," said Zadig, "ever gallop'd smoother; he is about five Foot high, his Hoofs are very small; his Tail is about three Foot six Inches long; the studs of his Bit are of pure Gold, about 23 Carats; and his Shoes are of Silver, about Eleven penny Weight a-piece."
"What Course did he take, pray, Sir? Whereabouts is he?" said the Huntsman.
"I never sat Eyes on him," reply'd Zadig, "not I, neither did I ever hear before now, that his Majesty had such a Palfrey."
---------------------------------
Zadig proceeds Sherlock-style to explain how he deduced all these facts without seeing the horse, and does the same with the details of a lost dog about which he miraculously deduced a similar array of facts.
Don't let go of your childhood dreams so quickly... quicksand does too exist: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quicksand
What doesn't exist is (a) people actually being submerged and drowning in it, and (b) "dry" quicksand, ie quicksand without water.
Also, I'm not sure if alligators or enemy spies exist at all, so you should be okay...
What doesn't exist is (a) people actually being submerged and drowning in it, and (b) "dry" quicksand, ie quicksand without water.
Also, I'm not sure if alligators or enemy spies exist at all, so you should be okay...
Sorry, but if it doesn't actually kill you it's not the quicksand I know and love. That's just especially annoying mud.
What I love about that Wikipedia article is its link to this epic Slate investigation which mentions that quicksand "had its heyday in the 1960s, when almost 3% of all films showed someone sinking in mud, sand, or clay, but it has since fallen out of use." Some people are really into quicksand, man.
What I love about that Wikipedia article is its link to this epic Slate investigation which mentions that quicksand "had its heyday in the 1960s, when almost 3% of all films showed someone sinking in mud, sand, or clay, but it has since fallen out of use." Some people are really into quicksand, man.
Alex wrote: "especially annoying mud."
LOL
Alex wrote: "What I love about that Wikipedia article is its link to this epic Slate investigation..."
SIX pages; that is epic for Slate. Excellent link.
I'm reminded of US comedian Steven Wright's gag that as a child, he had a quicksand pit: "I was an only child...... [LONG pause] eventually."
LOL
Alex wrote: "What I love about that Wikipedia article is its link to this epic Slate investigation..."
SIX pages; that is epic for Slate. Excellent link.
I'm reminded of US comedian Steven Wright's gag that as a child, he had a quicksand pit: "I was an only child...... [LONG pause] eventually."
Ooh. I’ve had Woman in White on my TBR for a while now. You definitely make me want to get to it soon. And for whatever reason, knowing Collins was a laudanum addict just ramps up my intrigue. Great review, Alex!
Dickens wrote more good books than Collins (I couldn't make it through Collins' No Name, with its clunky prose, despite its interesting heroine). But The Woman in White is better and more complex (certainly in its characterization) than anything Dickens ever wrote. And The Moonstone is up there with Dickens' best. So yes, Collins over Dickens, although I only really love two of Collins' books. And Dickens wrote a lot of tripe, too, so I don't hold Collins' less-than-stellar work against him too much.
No Name is that bad, huh? I've only read the big two. I agree with everything you've said here! Thank you, that's well put.