Caroline 's Reviews > Wide Sargasso Sea
Wide Sargasso Sea
by
by
Caroline 's review
bookshelves: ho-hum, she-wrote-it, so-much-potential, literary-fiction, overrated, waste-of-trees
Apr 30, 2014
bookshelves: ho-hum, she-wrote-it, so-much-potential, literary-fiction, overrated, waste-of-trees
***SPOILERS HIDDEN***
***NO JANE EYRE SPOILERS***
Published nearly 120 years after Jane Eyre, the famous classic that inspired it, Wide Sargasso Sea is Jean Rhys's attempt to give Bertha Mason (here going primarily by the name "Antoinette Cosway") a detailed back story. It's crucial to read Jane Eyre before starting this. There's simply no understanding what happens in Wide Sargasso Sea otherwise. Although this doesn't matter because although Rhys's vision was strong, her execution was terrible, and Wide Sargasso Sea isn't worth reading anyway.
Rhys imagined Antoinette as a Creole girl in a gorgeously lush Jamaica, with the story opening at the height of political and racial tensions there. Unfortunately, this atmospheric setting can't compensate for Rhys's surprisingly weak and hazy portrayal of Antoinette.
This prequel is divided into three parts. A young Antoinette narrates part one; part two is narrated mostly by Mr. Rochester (nameless in this book for no reason); and part three is once again narrated by Antoinette, this time as an adult. Part one starts promisingly, but when Rochester materializes in part two, suddenly Antoinette is an adult woman, newly married to him, and the union is a loveless one. The time jump is too abrupt to work. Then, upsetting the smooth flow of part two, Antoinette's voice interrupts at one point, giving the impression that Rhys had trouble organizing the story.
The story is most intriguing and moves more quickly when it opens, when young Antoinette is trying to make sense of her relationship with her mother. Here's a part rich with the potential to add much-needed psychological depth, but Rhys neglected it so sorely that it's hard to understand why she included anything about their relationship. Another trouble spot concerns Rochester. Rhys allotted him a generous chunk of the story but didn't flesh out the man any more than she fleshed out Antoinette. Ample narrative devoted to him matters little nor should it change how fans of Jane Eyre feel about Rochester. His portrayal here is too colorless to inspire any passionate opinions (unlike his portrayal in the source material, notably).
Rhys's prose is horrible, both stylistically and technically. It's choppy and often convoluted; some punctuation is missing throughout or used incorrectly; and large sections, especially toward the end, veer into stream-of-consciousness. Repeated rereading, slower and with greater concentration, offers no help. Apparently nonsense is the point.
Rhys lacked a fine-tuned ear for speech, failing to use it to make her characters distinct. Rochester's impressions of their natural surroundings are striking not because of content but because they sound like Antoinette's:
Wide Sargasso Sea is a waste—of pages and of readers' time. Anyone eager to know more about the mystery woman from Jane Eyre won't find the answer in these pages. Bertha Mason, it seems, is fated to remain a mystery. Maybe one day a talented writer will take on the challenge of giving her a compelling backstory. I'll eagerly read it.
***NO JANE EYRE SPOILERS***
Published nearly 120 years after Jane Eyre, the famous classic that inspired it, Wide Sargasso Sea is Jean Rhys's attempt to give Bertha Mason (here going primarily by the name "Antoinette Cosway") a detailed back story. It's crucial to read Jane Eyre before starting this. There's simply no understanding what happens in Wide Sargasso Sea otherwise. Although this doesn't matter because although Rhys's vision was strong, her execution was terrible, and Wide Sargasso Sea isn't worth reading anyway.
Rhys imagined Antoinette as a Creole girl in a gorgeously lush Jamaica, with the story opening at the height of political and racial tensions there. Unfortunately, this atmospheric setting can't compensate for Rhys's surprisingly weak and hazy portrayal of Antoinette.
This prequel is divided into three parts. A young Antoinette narrates part one; part two is narrated mostly by Mr. Rochester (nameless in this book for no reason); and part three is once again narrated by Antoinette, this time as an adult. Part one starts promisingly, but when Rochester materializes in part two, suddenly Antoinette is an adult woman, newly married to him, and the union is a loveless one. The time jump is too abrupt to work. Then, upsetting the smooth flow of part two, Antoinette's voice interrupts at one point, giving the impression that Rhys had trouble organizing the story.
The story is most intriguing and moves more quickly when it opens, when young Antoinette is trying to make sense of her relationship with her mother. Here's a part rich with the potential to add much-needed psychological depth, but Rhys neglected it so sorely that it's hard to understand why she included anything about their relationship. Another trouble spot concerns Rochester. Rhys allotted him a generous chunk of the story but didn't flesh out the man any more than she fleshed out Antoinette. Ample narrative devoted to him matters little nor should it change how fans of Jane Eyre feel about Rochester. His portrayal here is too colorless to inspire any passionate opinions (unlike his portrayal in the source material, notably).
Rhys's prose is horrible, both stylistically and technically. It's choppy and often convoluted; some punctuation is missing throughout or used incorrectly; and large sections, especially toward the end, veer into stream-of-consciousness. Repeated rereading, slower and with greater concentration, offers no help. Apparently nonsense is the point.
Rhys lacked a fine-tuned ear for speech, failing to use it to make her characters distinct. Rochester's impressions of their natural surroundings are striking not because of content but because they sound like Antoinette's:
Rochester: "One morning soon after we arrived, the row of tall trees outside my window were covered with small pale flowers too fragile to resist the wind. They fell in a day, and looked like snow on the rough grass—snow with a faint sweet scent. Then they were blown away. [...] It was a beautiful place—wild, untouched, above all untouched, with an alien, disturbing, secret loveliness. And it kept its secret."Wide Sargasso Sea failed in its goal to shed light on Antoinette and make her human. Her sections should be the most powerful, yet she remains as she did in Jane Eyre: a shadow of a woman, indistinct, scary, never able to be truly understood or even pictured. But probably most inexcusable is that Rhys implied that Antoinette's plunge into insanity (view spoiler) . This would be laughable if it weren't so offensive—in more than one way.Antoinette: "I can remember every second of that morning, if I shut my eyes I can see the deep blue colour of the sky and the mango leaves, the pink and red hibiscus, the yellow handkerchief she wore round her head, tied in the Martinique fashion with the sharp points in front, but now I see everything still, fixed for ever like the colours in a stained-glass window."
Wide Sargasso Sea is a waste—of pages and of readers' time. Anyone eager to know more about the mystery woman from Jane Eyre won't find the answer in these pages. Bertha Mason, it seems, is fated to remain a mystery. Maybe one day a talented writer will take on the challenge of giving her a compelling backstory. I'll eagerly read it.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Wide Sargasso Sea.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
April 30, 2014
– Shelved
April 30, 2014
– Shelved as:
to-read
May 3, 2014
–
Started Reading
May 10, 2014
–
78.95%
"Forty pages from the end of a very weak portrayal of Bertha. I guess this character is just destined to get short shrift."
page
150
May 15, 2014
–
Finished Reading
May 16, 2014
– Shelved as:
ho-hum
November 24, 2014
– Shelved as:
she-wrote-it
May 22, 2015
– Shelved as:
so-much-potential
November 9, 2017
– Shelved as:
literary-fiction
April 14, 2018
– Shelved as:
overrated
March 26, 2019
– Shelved as:
waste-of-trees
Comments Showing 1-21 of 21 (21 new)
date
newest »
message 1:
by
Leanne
(new)
May 16, 2014 08:14AM
Ugh - definitely doesn't sound like my cup of tea!
reply
|
flag
Thanks for putting clear words down for the limitations you found. "Hazy portrayals" may be why I put it aside after my attempt on the book awhile back. But I still want to explore some of her Paris tales.
Wonderful review, as always, Caroline. You write so beautifully!
If I ever write a novel, I want you to be the first one to review it. At least that way I'll enjoy reading about how much my novel sucked. :-D
If I ever write a novel, I want you to be the first one to review it. At least that way I'll enjoy reading about how much my novel sucked. :-D
Leanne wrote: "Ugh - definitely doesn't sound like my cup of tea!"
Yeah, really; don't even bother. Jane Eyre: 100% worth it, but this...I'm so surprised I didn't enjoy it more considering how much I loved JE.
Yeah, really; don't even bother. Jane Eyre: 100% worth it, but this...I'm so surprised I didn't enjoy it more considering how much I loved JE.
Laurie wrote: "I saw the movie version about 20 years ago and really enjoyed it, but don't think I will be reading this one.
Great review Caroline."
Laurie, I really liked the movie too! This is a rare instance when the movie outshines the book.
Great review Caroline."
Laurie, I really liked the movie too! This is a rare instance when the movie outshines the book.
Michael wrote: "Thanks for putting clear words down for the limitations you found. "Hazy portrayals" may be why I put it aside after my attempt on the book awhile back. But I still want to explore some of her Pa..."
Thank you, Michael. I find it interesting that this is the book that made her famous, but maybe her other work is actually better. Sometimes that is the case.
Thank you, Michael. I find it interesting that this is the book that made her famous, but maybe her other work is actually better. Sometimes that is the case.
Chris wrote: "Wonderful review, as always, Caroline. You write so beautifully!
If I ever write a novel, I want you to be the first one to review it. At least that way I'll enjoy reading about how much my no..."
Thanks for the compliment, Chris. I seriously LOL when I read your last sentence! :D
If I ever write a novel, I want you to be the first one to review it. At least that way I'll enjoy reading about how much my no..."
Thanks for the compliment, Chris. I seriously LOL when I read your last sentence! :D
Excellent review, Caroline. I don't think I'll be reading this one.
Helpful review, thank you, Caroline! It has officially been "maybe'd", which literally translates to "not likely". :)
Cher wrote: "Helpful review, thank you, Caroline! It has officially been "maybe'd", which literally translate to "not likely". :)"
Thanks, Cher. I totally assumed this would be a win since I'm such a fan of JE (and because I liked the WSS movie).
Thanks, Cher. I totally assumed this would be a win since I'm such a fan of JE (and because I liked the WSS movie).
Lisa wrote: "Great review, Caroline. You might have actually convinced me, to remove this from my to read shelf."
Thanks, Lisa. I was disappointed to be disappointed by it. :[
Thanks, Lisa. I was disappointed to be disappointed by it. :[
Caroline, The premise is wonderful, but obviously that's not sufficient. Oh well, 1 off, a bunch of thousands to go. ;-)
Ha! I gave it one star, though my review is much terser than yours:
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
I got this one off my daughter's book shelf. She told me, ummm, you won't like it.
She was right.
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
I got this one off my daughter's book shelf. She told me, ummm, you won't like it.
She was right.
Jaksen wrote: "Ha! I gave it one star, though my review is much terser than yours:
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
I got this one off my daughter's book shelf. She told me, ummm, you won't like ..."
It's just so terrible! I want my time back.
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
I got this one off my daughter's book shelf. She told me, ummm, you won't like ..."
It's just so terrible! I want my time back.
Linda wrote: "Great review!. Sounds like a good book to skip."
Thank you, Linda. Yes, I recommend skipping it.
Thank you, Linda. Yes, I recommend skipping it.
Wonderful review, Caroline! It's on my list of books read, but it must not have made much of an impression on me as I didn't even rate it. I definitely won't be reading it again thanks to your review!