Greg's Reviews > Blindsight
Blindsight (Firefall, #1)
by
by
You know you're in for trouble when the dedication of the book says:
"If we're not in pain, we're not alive."
One of the quotes before the novel starts is:
"you will die like a dog for no good reason"
And the quote that starts the first chapter is one by Ted Bundy!
But still, it's a sci-fi book about consciousness...how could I not love it?
-----------------------------------------
I've always loved Science Fiction, and not just because books about the future are inherently cool. The reason I've always loved science fiction is because I've always loved philosophy. From a young age I enjoyed thinking about what makes us human, what is the nature of "self", what is the nature of reality, and a host of other questions along those lines. Science fiction stories are able to take philosophical thought experiments and put them into a literal environment. This type of setting might not serve to replace an in-depth philosophical or scientific analysis, but it will certainly serve to prompt your mind into a continued exploration of these ideas, with the benefit of telling the story in a far more interesting way than can be done in 1800s London! (sorry Dickens)
Blindsight might be one of the most superb books I've ever read at this type of story telling. In part because every aspect of this book is infused with it, from the nature of the characters themselves, to the dialog, to the plot. Whether you want your philosophy just beneath the surface or knocking you over the head, this book will deliver...as long as you want both.
On the surface Blindsight is your classic first contact story, with a special team sent to the edge of the solar system to make contact with an alien intelligence. But in this not to distant future humanity has modified itself to the point where none of the characters involved are recognizably human. While this might not be the newest plot device ever, it's not in the realm of physical differences that sets these characters apart, but in mental differences. In the nature of their consciousness. And it is when they finally make contact with the aliens, who, paradoxically, may be intelligent but not sentient, and who further, are not particularly happy to see them, that the story really grabs you by the balls (or whatever you prefer to be grabbed by). Watts was seamlessly able to mix action, terror, and philosophy into one engaging narrative. Something I didn't think could be easily done.
A few of the more interesting questions (to me) in regards to consciousness have to do with why consciousness would ever have evolved. What were its benefits? What were the mechanisms that allowed it to evolve? What function did it serve? Blindsight doesn't attempt to answer any of these questions specifically. But what it does do, and do brilliantly, is pose a whole bunch of related questions that make those questions I asked even more important. Anyone familiar with neurological conditions such as agnosia, neglect, and yes, blindsight, knows that the brain can go wrong in countless ways, radically altering our conscious experience. Anyone who has excelled at a sport or a musical instrument knows that thinking too consciously about something just interferes with your ability to do it well. By pointing out the drawbacks and limitations of consciousness, Watts forces us ask ourselves, "what IS consciousness good for?"
I found something that I wrote some years back, it was just a passing thought that I never explored, but it was this:
If any of these questions interest you, and you enjoy science fiction, and don't mind a bit of a darker bend to you reading material, do yourself a favor and check out this book.
It's also one of the only fiction books I've ever read that actually had a whole section of notes and references after the last chapter, briefly explaining all the legitimate scientific sources the ideas in the book were taken from. Kudos Watts.
"If we're not in pain, we're not alive."
One of the quotes before the novel starts is:
"you will die like a dog for no good reason"
And the quote that starts the first chapter is one by Ted Bundy!
But still, it's a sci-fi book about consciousness...how could I not love it?
-----------------------------------------
I've always loved Science Fiction, and not just because books about the future are inherently cool. The reason I've always loved science fiction is because I've always loved philosophy. From a young age I enjoyed thinking about what makes us human, what is the nature of "self", what is the nature of reality, and a host of other questions along those lines. Science fiction stories are able to take philosophical thought experiments and put them into a literal environment. This type of setting might not serve to replace an in-depth philosophical or scientific analysis, but it will certainly serve to prompt your mind into a continued exploration of these ideas, with the benefit of telling the story in a far more interesting way than can be done in 1800s London! (sorry Dickens)
Blindsight might be one of the most superb books I've ever read at this type of story telling. In part because every aspect of this book is infused with it, from the nature of the characters themselves, to the dialog, to the plot. Whether you want your philosophy just beneath the surface or knocking you over the head, this book will deliver...as long as you want both.
On the surface Blindsight is your classic first contact story, with a special team sent to the edge of the solar system to make contact with an alien intelligence. But in this not to distant future humanity has modified itself to the point where none of the characters involved are recognizably human. While this might not be the newest plot device ever, it's not in the realm of physical differences that sets these characters apart, but in mental differences. In the nature of their consciousness. And it is when they finally make contact with the aliens, who, paradoxically, may be intelligent but not sentient, and who further, are not particularly happy to see them, that the story really grabs you by the balls (or whatever you prefer to be grabbed by). Watts was seamlessly able to mix action, terror, and philosophy into one engaging narrative. Something I didn't think could be easily done.
A few of the more interesting questions (to me) in regards to consciousness have to do with why consciousness would ever have evolved. What were its benefits? What were the mechanisms that allowed it to evolve? What function did it serve? Blindsight doesn't attempt to answer any of these questions specifically. But what it does do, and do brilliantly, is pose a whole bunch of related questions that make those questions I asked even more important. Anyone familiar with neurological conditions such as agnosia, neglect, and yes, blindsight, knows that the brain can go wrong in countless ways, radically altering our conscious experience. Anyone who has excelled at a sport or a musical instrument knows that thinking too consciously about something just interferes with your ability to do it well. By pointing out the drawbacks and limitations of consciousness, Watts forces us ask ourselves, "what IS consciousness good for?"
I found something that I wrote some years back, it was just a passing thought that I never explored, but it was this:
Consciousness almost seems like a bad adaptive trait. It almost gets in the way sometimes. Limits our focus. Why do we have a brain that can store so much data, but this consciousness that has a limit of the awareness of the data.
If any of these questions interest you, and you enjoy science fiction, and don't mind a bit of a darker bend to you reading material, do yourself a favor and check out this book.
It's also one of the only fiction books I've ever read that actually had a whole section of notes and references after the last chapter, briefly explaining all the legitimate scientific sources the ideas in the book were taken from. Kudos Watts.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Blindsight.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
November 12, 2009
– Shelved
February 9, 2010
–
Started Reading
February 18, 2010
–
80.73%
"This guys has managed to pack all of my philosophical musings over the past years into one dark, action packed sci-fi novel. Brilliant!"
page
310
February 23, 2010
– Shelved as:
speculative-fiction
February 23, 2010
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-9 of 9 (9 new)
date
newest »
message 1:
by
Kat Kennedy
(new)
May 31, 2010 11:32PM
This sounds really interesting! I think I might have to give it a try!
reply
|
flag
I hope you do Kat! It's certainly fascinating and engaging. I should warn you though, besides being a bit dark, it also might be a bit confusing to follow. It's narrated by one of the characters, who happens to have had half his brain removed. Once you let go of the idea that you should have a clear idea of what is happening at all times, and just enjoy the ride, it'll flow much easier.
Thanks Mike.
Thanks Mike.
Greg, does the book get into Anatomy & Physiology of the brain? I like my 'SciFi' steeped in as much 'Sci' as possible. It's sick and wrong to discuss philosophy and consciousness without considering the actual structure and function of the brain, as I'm sure you're aware being a philosophy buff.
Good review--I'm adding to my to-read list.
Good review--I'm adding to my to-read list.
Jason, this is the "hardest" sci-fi book I can remember reading. Peter Watts has a PhD in marine biology, so he knows his physiology. I'm not just a philosophy buff, but a neuroscience/cognitive science buff, and this guy has done his homework. Many of the ideas dealing with issues in neuroscience were right on. Much of the biology was over my head, but I can only imagine it was legitimate.
You're like me--don't hand out the 5-stars very often. So in what folders would I find the best 5-star reads like this one? In your:
-speculative fiction
-fiction
-general non-fiction
-mind and brain
-speculative fiction
-fiction
-general non-fiction
-mind and brain
I couldn't agree with this review more! You've completely nailed the reasons I love this book so much on the head - couldn't have said it better myself! I've studied biology, genetics & psychology at university, & I have always held a deep interest in philosophy. Blindsight's narrative deals with all of these subjects so well!
I've been taking Russian language classes on the weekends for the last 3 years (though I'm nowhere near fluent - it's a grammatically-complicated language!)... Why Russian, specifically? Not sure, to be honest. Maybe a childhood in the US during the waning stages of the Cold War has something to do with my interests, but apart from that, I just simply like the way the language sounds, & I find Russia's history & culture quite interesting.