Jill's Reviews > The Humans
The Humans
by
by
Premise: A socially awkward alien lands Earthside, naked on a Cambridge street…
And for a while, as Matt Haig builds from this premise, it’s funny! The Humans begins quite wonderfully with the arrival of an alien who can barely disguise his contempt towards humans and believes clothing is optional. The humor works because of our extraterrestrial narrator's terrific voice, which is matter of fact and superior. For example, the first piece of “literature” he reads is an issue of Cosmopolitan, which leads to this pithy discussion of magazines:
Wishes never come true, however, so the last half of the book ditches the humor and devolves into New Age mumbo jumbo. The plot is unoriginal. Basically an alien comes to save Earth from too much knowledge, learns to appreciate humans, and abandons his old alien life to become a regular Joe Schmo. To supplement this lack of plot, Haig tries to explore the meaning of life through our bumbling old alien narrator, whose voice becomes instantly less charming as soon as he’s humanized.
Blah. The moment someone expressly searches for the meaning of life is the moment I roll my eyes. Sure I find meaning aplenty in books, but it must arise organically through the natural interaction of characters and their environments. Even worse, the meaning of life discovered by Haig’s alien is more clichéd than a Hallmark card. There are a ton of lines like this at the end that made me figuratively gag:
The reason the alien comes to Earth is to destroy a mathematical proof. So here’s some reviewing math for The Humans: smart-alecky alien who makes fun of humankind (4 stars) + heavy-handed existential tripe (2 stars) = 3 stars. Boom, math.
And for a while, as Matt Haig builds from this premise, it’s funny! The Humans begins quite wonderfully with the arrival of an alien who can barely disguise his contempt towards humans and believes clothing is optional. The humor works because of our extraterrestrial narrator's terrific voice, which is matter of fact and superior. For example, the first piece of “literature” he reads is an issue of Cosmopolitan, which leads to this pithy discussion of magazines:
Magazines are very popular, despite no human’s ever feeling better for having read them. Indeed, their chief purpose is to generate a sense of inferiority in the reader that consequently leads to a feeling of needing to buy something, which the humans then do, and then feel even worse, and so need to buy another magazine to see what they can buy next. It is an eternal and unhappy spiral that goes by the name of capitalism, and it is really quite popular.I would have liked an entire book of this: just a doofy alien in human form walking around the modern world trying—and failing—to make sense of it.
Wishes never come true, however, so the last half of the book ditches the humor and devolves into New Age mumbo jumbo. The plot is unoriginal. Basically an alien comes to save Earth from too much knowledge, learns to appreciate humans, and abandons his old alien life to become a regular Joe Schmo. To supplement this lack of plot, Haig tries to explore the meaning of life through our bumbling old alien narrator, whose voice becomes instantly less charming as soon as he’s humanized.
Blah. The moment someone expressly searches for the meaning of life is the moment I roll my eyes. Sure I find meaning aplenty in books, but it must arise organically through the natural interaction of characters and their environments. Even worse, the meaning of life discovered by Haig’s alien is more clichéd than a Hallmark card. There are a ton of lines like this at the end that made me figuratively gag:
To experience beauty on Earth, you needed to experience pain and to know mortality. That is why so much that is beautiful on this planet has to do with time passing and the Earth turning. Which might also explain why to look at such natural beauty was to also feel sadness and a craving for a life unlived.There are tons of quotes about how “love is life” and how “it’s only through our flaws that we can truly appreciate humankind." By this point, I’d mostly checked out, hoping the narrator had one last good joke in him about Catholics. (He didn’t.)
The reason the alien comes to Earth is to destroy a mathematical proof. So here’s some reviewing math for The Humans: smart-alecky alien who makes fun of humankind (4 stars) + heavy-handed existential tripe (2 stars) = 3 stars. Boom, math.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The Humans.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Comments Showing 1-16 of 16 (16 new)
date
newest »
message 1:
by
Khanh, first of her name, mother of bunnies
(new)
Sep 17, 2013 11:45PM
You should include a few derivatives in your formula just to make it more difficult :D Maybe a few limits, too.
reply
|
flag
Great review, Jill. Besides the philosophical stuff, the whole making fun of humans sounds enticing. So, as bad as the other parts might be, I'm adding it :D
Khanh wrote: "You should include a few derivatives in your formula just to make it more difficult :D Maybe a few limits, too."
Gahhh, I wish! I'm one too many years removed from my last math class. It's one of the most depressing facts of my life that I spent years learning advanced algebra and calculus, and I forgot it all in less than 3 months. Now even simple addition feels like an accomplishment for me.
Gahhh, I wish! I'm one too many years removed from my last math class. It's one of the most depressing facts of my life that I spent years learning advanced algebra and calculus, and I forgot it all in less than 3 months. Now even simple addition feels like an accomplishment for me.
Komal wrote: "Great review, Jill. Besides the philosophical stuff, the whole making fun of humans sounds enticing. So, as bad as the other parts might be, I'm adding it :D"
Yay for adding it! The philosophy bits aren't that bad. I think they may have been extra worse for me since I've studied philosophy and anthropology, so all the things he was saying were old news.
Yay for adding it! The philosophy bits aren't that bad. I think they may have been extra worse for me since I've studied philosophy and anthropology, so all the things he was saying were old news.
Haha I loved his thoughts on magazines. So true!
May have added this to the tbr if you had given it one more star.
May have added this to the tbr if you had given it one more star.
Samadrita wrote: "Haha I loved his thoughts on magazines. So true!
May have added this to the tbr if you had given it one more star."
Yeah, I doubt you'd really enjoy this Samadrita. It's a mediocre read, and why waste time with mediocre books when there are so many fantastic ones?
May have added this to the tbr if you had given it one more star."
Yeah, I doubt you'd really enjoy this Samadrita. It's a mediocre read, and why waste time with mediocre books when there are so many fantastic ones?
This review echoes my thoughts exactly. It was smart, and fun, for the first half. After that it got a bit overly sentimental. I still enjoyed most of it, mind, but it lost me for the very reasons you mentioned. Three stars sounds right.
I'm so pleased to see another 3* review. Most people seemed to love it, with the odd person hating it, but very few people seem in between.
I enjoyed it and I love Matt Haig (I'd definitely recommend following him on Twitter) but to me this book was good. Not bad. Not exceptional. Just good.
I do think a lot of the issue for me was that this book is so over hyped that it would be almost impossible for it to live up to expectations.
Your review however gets 5/5 haha.
I enjoyed it and I love Matt Haig (I'd definitely recommend following him on Twitter) but to me this book was good. Not bad. Not exceptional. Just good.
I do think a lot of the issue for me was that this book is so over hyped that it would be almost impossible for it to live up to expectations.
Your review however gets 5/5 haha.
I'm so pleased to see another 3* review. Most people seemed to love it, with the odd person hating it, but very few people seem in between.
I enjoyed it and I love Matt Haig (I'd definitely recommend following him on Twitter) but to me this book was good. Not bad. Not exceptional. Just good.
I do think a lot of the issue for me was that this book is so over hyped that it would be almost impossible for it to live up to expectations.
Your review however gets 5/5 haha.
I enjoyed it and I love Matt Haig (I'd definitely recommend following him on Twitter) but to me this book was good. Not bad. Not exceptional. Just good.
I do think a lot of the issue for me was that this book is so over hyped that it would be almost impossible for it to live up to expectations.
Your review however gets 5/5 haha.
Chelsey, I too was a victim of the hype. It has a lot of insane positively reviews which made me push it to the top of my reading list! I didn't find anything in its pages to recommend it so strongly, however...
Very well said. That list of 100 pearls of wisdom at the end were so self-indulgent. "Boom! Math" Perfect .
I agree with you! Plus, I don’t know how the story ended that way? Would the hosts let humans know that they do exist that easily? I mean come on, they would wipe out the family with Andrew (The alien) because he confessed that he is human now and can be killed. What Andrew did was treason and instead of preventing the humans from discovering the Riemann hypothesis, he expose his people to the human kind. That didn’t add up, I would wipe them all!