mark monday's Reviews > Witch King

Witch King by Martha Wells
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
131922
's review

liked it
bookshelves: fantasy-modern

Martha Wells turns everything upside down in this thrill-packed adventure that has its cast of superpowered immortals traveling across an atypical fantasy world as they seek to unravel a conspiracy and find a kidnapped friend, while the occasional flashback chapters detail a revolution against an insidious imperial power. this is the opposite of a European-derived fantasy, as it features various nomadic and Arabic or Persian-inspired societies, matriarchal cultures, heroic witches, and benign demons who include the Witch King himself (complete with a very positive spin on both possession and blood magic). the multiple magic systems on display all worked, as did the book's take on angels, who are basically rigid, haughty jerks riding flying chariots. the novel is a lot of flash and bang, with a strong undercurrent of melancholy and sadness as well, due to the multiple examples of slavery and genocide that once occurred while this world was subjugated by its former colonial masters. despite that darkness, Wells' story is bright and cheeky and very easy going down. at times I was pleasantly reminded of His Dark Materials, which is always appreciated. also: swimming through a drowned city!

the book has all of the most current of progressive ideologies on display, alongside more classic progressive tropes such as the centering of female characters and a strong critique of empire-building and colonialism. in other books, I've found attempts to merge modern progressive ideals with genre templates to be incredibly risible (looking at you, Every Fart a Doorway and The Book of Assholes); those chores were unfinishable for me. the virtue signalling from their supposedly enlightened authors just rang so hollow and felt so forced and so fake, it was nauseating. not so with Witch King! Wells did just what she needed to do to make it all work: she made sure that all of the au courant race and trans/gender ideologies on display were organic to her world and its characters; not shoehorned in by a clumsy author, but made an intrinsic part of the worldbuilding and the characterization. and so the book has multiple trans characters who are referred to by the pronouns of their inner selves, not their bodies; nonbinary characters; a non-jarring use of "they" as a default, until the gender of the character is established (and who include theys); a distinct queerness in the descriptions of clothing and hair choices as well as in the actual gender roles of various ethnic cultures; complete normalization of same-sex love and marriage; communal societies favored over rigidly hierarchical societies (demon royalty and their servants chat and eat together as equals; the villains are literally named "Hierarchs" and are aided by "Patriarchs" LOL); and a cast that is mainly all the shades of brown (with whiteness relegated to the evil imperialists and those obnoxious angels, LOL again). the book is basically a woke wet dream, and even as a person who has many issues with the modern far-left and its often annoying ideological stances, I could only sit back and admire the layered complexity of the author's vision and how she made it all feel so easy, so well-integrated, so wonderfully natural.

why 3 stars and not 4? as is often the case with the many 3-star books I've fully enjoyed, it comes down to the quality of the prose itself. despite my admiration for the seamless inclusion of (presumably) the author's politics, the fascinating cultures, the brisk pacing... the writing itself felt fairly basic, almost Young Adult at times. I wanted Tanith Lee but I got fantasy John Scalzi; the prose did not sing. the same goes for the dialogue, which was often too snarky and too modern in its vernacular, and its characters, who were fun but surprisingly shallow despite the richness of their backstories and cultures. despite being immortal witches and demons and angels, no one felt strange, let alone nonhuman; they felt like the friendly colleagues I see nearly every day. I also question the title, which felt bizarrely chauvinist given the very female-forward nature of this book (plus our hero Kaiisteron is literally not the king of the witches!). ah well, that said, 3 stars is still a positive rating for me and I had a very positive experience reading this entirely enjoyable book.
83 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Witch King.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

January 15, 2024 – Started Reading
January 15, 2024 – Shelved
January 15, 2024 – Shelved as: fantasy-modern
January 28, 2024 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-6 of 6 (6 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Jefferson "I wanted Tanith Lee but I got fantasy John Scalzi"--great line! I'm reading Death's Master now and reveling in it. But I'll read Witch King, too, at some point: not everyone can write prose that sings like Tanith Lee, and I like Murderbot fine, and I like what you say about the gender and race stuff in Witch King.


mark monday it was a pleasure to read - I'm sure you'll enjoy it. I should have written more about the book's very original take on possession, which was fascinating.

Death's Master and all of those Flat Earth books are amazing. I really need to reread them!


message 3: by carol. (last edited Jan 31, 2024 03:45AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

carol. mark! I believe this is one of the first times in history we must have been in Book Synchrony. That is so cool, that I get to read your thoughts on it in a more timely fashion. IWhat a well-thought out analysis of both the shortcomings and the highlights of her work.

I think she is very much a character creator and world-builder, and while I didn't notice the prose while I was reading, I have to agree with you, for the most part (I mean, it is better than 99% of the urban fantasy I read, so there's that for comparison). Maybe 'Bot and her editors have had an effect, because I feel like she is capable of a little more (see City of Bones), but then again, you make a good point, does it ever sing to me? And I have to admit, judging by my highlights, not really. But I like the humor, which is also very Scalzi-an. Also agree about your strangeness; I think she approached it, but it didn't feel as strange as the Raksura.

Absolutely agree with you about organic non-Western, progressive-type humanistic ideals--really, a hallmark of Wells--that doesn't feel like virtue signaling.

Agree very much with Jefferson that the 'Lee vs Scalzi' line is a great comparison, although I stopped reading Lee when I was younger because I found the lack of plotting annoying, Perhaps it's time to pick her up. Anything you recommend?

Sorry for the long comment(s), but, well, it was fun to read this with you. Metaphysically, at least. ;)


mark monday It's funny, despite us having a lot of overlap when it comes to our tastes, we are rarely in sync reading current books. No doubt due to my predilection for past masters. It's nice to at long last be on the same reading schedule! There was just something about this book that forced me to read it right away. It looked so fun and interesting. (and it was.)

Although I do favor prose over narrative, I'm also fine with a book that favors the latter over the former. otherwise I couldn't read so much pulp fiction lol. As far as Tanith Lee goes, it is hard for me to recommend anything, because she has nearly always what you describe: lack of plotting, style over narrative. although she does do good character work, which I know you like. and she was playing with gender, centering female characters, and other progressive tropes well before anyone else (although I would hesitate to call her books humanistic - too cynical and perverse, I think.) her classics are probably within the Flat Earth series (Death's Master, Night's Master, etc.) and the Silver-Metal Lover. as far as the rare times that she gets more plot-oriented and foregoes a focus on style, probably the very fun Kill the Dead and the rather grueling White As Snow.

I have City of Bones! I look forward to reading it. I think I actually picked it up due to your review!


carol. Ah, now that you are saying that, you are reminding me of what challenged me about Lee--the stuff that you lump into 'perverse,' I suspect. I'm older now, however. :) Thanks for the lead.

Go for the new edition of City of Bones. I think she tightened it up.


mark monday Makes sense to me - I really don't see 'perverse' as being your thing. But it often is mine!


back to top