Jack Kelley's Reviews > Termination Shock
Termination Shock
by
by
As long as this is nothing like The Ministry for the Future, I’ll be happy. -7/14/21
1/31/22: Well, it was better than The Ministry for the Future, but still not immune to many of the problems that book had, particularly the pacing and tendency to go off into tangents that, while occasionally interesting, usually seem to do nothing more than increase the page count.
3/5 stars.
1/31/22: Well, it was better than The Ministry for the Future, but still not immune to many of the problems that book had, particularly the pacing and tendency to go off into tangents that, while occasionally interesting, usually seem to do nothing more than increase the page count.
3/5 stars.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Termination Shock.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
July 14, 2021
– Shelved
July 14, 2021
– Shelved as:
to-read
July 14, 2021
– Shelved as:
2021-releases
January 3, 2022
–
Started Reading
January 19, 2022
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-10 of 10 (10 new)
date
newest »
message 1:
by
Jack
(new)
-
added it
Jul 21, 2021 08:39AM
Wasn't that Kim Stanley Robinson?
reply
|
flag
Yeah, that’s what I mean- a cli-fi book that I had high hopes for and ended up being absolutely miserable and (for me) just awful to get through.
I still keep my copy of The Ministry for the Future as a sleeping aid : just trying to read three pages puts me in a near-comatose sleep even after several cups of coffee.
I think I have a hard time with Kim Stanley Robinson's work in general. Every time I try to read one of his books, I find myself growing increasingly disinterested as the books progress. Interesting ideas, but his execution is lacking.
Hmm, I really enjoyed MftF. Didn't have any issues getting through it.
Red Mars took some time in part because of the length of it all and just the amount of pages describing baren landmasses.
MtfF is much better on both counts. (I do like Red Mars more as a book, but find MftF just as interesting).
Red Mars took some time in part because of the length of it all and just the amount of pages describing baren landmasses.
MtfF is much better on both counts. (I do like Red Mars more as a book, but find MftF just as interesting).
I liked Ministry for the Future and read it all, although it was a letdown -- and a bleak outlook but understandably.
The comparison of KSR and Stephenson is valid, though. They both jam a lot of ideas into their books and try to weave them together as a story. I think many of us read them mainly for those ideas, not the stories.
The comparison of KSR and Stephenson is valid, though. They both jam a lot of ideas into their books and try to weave them together as a story. I think many of us read them mainly for those ideas, not the stories.