Kalliope's Reviews > The Proud Tower: A Portrait of the World Before the War, 1890-1914
The Proud Tower: A Portrait of the World Before the War, 1890-1914
by
This book is really a collection of essays published separately in various journals. Any book tackling the social, political and artistic situation of the world in the couple of decades before it entered its first global war, could only offer a partial view. These essays offer a series of selected aspects of this bellicose universe seen through shifting points of view.
There are considerable absences. For example, Russia and the Austro-Hungarian and the Ottoman empires are not tackled. Instead we get a focus on Britain, France, the German Empire and the United States. There are additional chapters on Syndicalism, Anarchism, the institution of the Hague Conferences, and on a German Musician.
I have two favorite chapters. I learned a great deal from the one devoted to the US in which Tuchman shows how after the annexation of the Territory of Hawaii the country turned into something different from the days when it was founded. Fascinating was also the account of The Hague Conventions which tackled how, if they fundamentally failed, they also succeeded in starting a protocol that after some developments alleviated some aspects of brutality when humans decide to engage in war.
The least relevant of the chapters was the one dedicated to a German composer. Entertaining in itself it seemed to grant disproportionate attention to Richard Strauss, no matter how beautiful his music is.
And yet, in spite of the merged nature of this collation of essays, an overall picture emerges. From the Proud Tower we can see that it was the social structure of society, with its internal and extreme poles, that pulled a greater and greater tension and finally made the inner strings snap. But the view also offers the realization that if these social tensions were felt in parallel in the countries Tuchman has selected, their logical international relevancy was poisoned by distorting nationalisms.
What could have been a series of revolutionary and coetaneous changes in domestic social pacts, marched instead into a political war against other nations. The book starts with the idiosyncrasies and quirks of the British Lords and finishes with the assassination of Jean Jaurès-- one of the founders of the French Socialist Party-- for being a pacifist. A nationalist shot him fatally a couple of days after the war against Serbia had been declared and four days before the war became general.
Tuchman writes in a very engaging manner, but to me it was at times too engaging. I prefer a more analytical and less journalistic approach. The facts and arguments stay better in my mind.
by
While from a proud tower in the town
Death looks gigantically down
The City in the Sea – Poe.
This book is really a collection of essays published separately in various journals. Any book tackling the social, political and artistic situation of the world in the couple of decades before it entered its first global war, could only offer a partial view. These essays offer a series of selected aspects of this bellicose universe seen through shifting points of view.
There are considerable absences. For example, Russia and the Austro-Hungarian and the Ottoman empires are not tackled. Instead we get a focus on Britain, France, the German Empire and the United States. There are additional chapters on Syndicalism, Anarchism, the institution of the Hague Conferences, and on a German Musician.
I have two favorite chapters. I learned a great deal from the one devoted to the US in which Tuchman shows how after the annexation of the Territory of Hawaii the country turned into something different from the days when it was founded. Fascinating was also the account of The Hague Conventions which tackled how, if they fundamentally failed, they also succeeded in starting a protocol that after some developments alleviated some aspects of brutality when humans decide to engage in war.
The least relevant of the chapters was the one dedicated to a German composer. Entertaining in itself it seemed to grant disproportionate attention to Richard Strauss, no matter how beautiful his music is.
And yet, in spite of the merged nature of this collation of essays, an overall picture emerges. From the Proud Tower we can see that it was the social structure of society, with its internal and extreme poles, that pulled a greater and greater tension and finally made the inner strings snap. But the view also offers the realization that if these social tensions were felt in parallel in the countries Tuchman has selected, their logical international relevancy was poisoned by distorting nationalisms.
What could have been a series of revolutionary and coetaneous changes in domestic social pacts, marched instead into a political war against other nations. The book starts with the idiosyncrasies and quirks of the British Lords and finishes with the assassination of Jean Jaurès-- one of the founders of the French Socialist Party-- for being a pacifist. A nationalist shot him fatally a couple of days after the war against Serbia had been declared and four days before the war became general.
Tuchman writes in a very engaging manner, but to me it was at times too engaging. I prefer a more analytical and less journalistic approach. The facts and arguments stay better in my mind.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The Proud Tower.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
August 9, 2012
– Shelved
August 9, 2012
– Shelved as:
history
August 9, 2012
– Shelved as:
history-european
July 15, 2013
– Shelved as:
considering
December 27, 2013
–
Started Reading
December 27, 2013
– Shelved as:
ww-i
January 4, 2014
–
Finished Reading
February 16, 2016
– Shelved as:
2014
Comments Showing 1-18 of 18 (18 new)
date
newest »
Fionnuala wrote:
coetaneous
I love learning new words."
Latin terms sound very erudite in English, but in the corrupted-latin languages they are a great deal more common...
:)
coetaneous
I love learning new words."
Latin terms sound very erudite in English, but in the corrupted-latin languages they are a great deal more common...
:)
Kalliope wrote: "Fionnuala wrote:
Latin terms sound very erudite in English, but in the corrupted-latin languages they are a great deal more common...
:)"
Because those languages have Virgil standing behind them, and not Beowulf. :)
Latin terms sound very erudite in English, but in the corrupted-latin languages they are a great deal more common...
:)"
Because those languages have Virgil standing behind them, and not Beowulf. :)
Andrew wrote: "
:)"
Because those languages have Virgil standing behind them, and not Beowulf. :)
..."
Yes, haha...!!!..
:)"
Because those languages have Virgil standing behind them, and not Beowulf. :)
..."
Yes, haha...!!!..
Your review is a joy to read, capturing the essence of Tuchman's achievement in writing of the coming of The Great War. Your comments regarding the journalistic approach of the author mirror reviews contemporary with the book's original publication. Yet, I do not know that Tuchman could have been any more analytical in her final product other than writing a number of individual volumes.
Tuchman was quite touchy on being perceived as an amateur historian, looked down on by "professional" academic historians. In retrospect, Tuchman has left a legacy of producing accurate, but accessible history that enlightens many readers who would be lost in more rigorous academic works.
Your favorite portions of the book were also my favorites. Regarding America's "looking outward" I highly recommend The War Lovers: Roosevelt, Lodge, Hearst, and the Rush to Empire, 1898 by Evan Thomas detailing the Spanish-American War both in Cuba and in the Philippines. For the British, I wish Tuchman had spent just a bit more time on the Boer War. See The Boer War by Thomas Pakenham. I was aware of Germany's African Colonies, but now I'm scurrying to find a little more information on the "Hottentot Wars."
We have so much material available to us regarding WWI, we should be able to have reads to share throughout the Centary years.
Brava on an exquisitely informative review! I'm slowly cobbling mine together. :)
Tuchman was quite touchy on being perceived as an amateur historian, looked down on by "professional" academic historians. In retrospect, Tuchman has left a legacy of producing accurate, but accessible history that enlightens many readers who would be lost in more rigorous academic works.
Your favorite portions of the book were also my favorites. Regarding America's "looking outward" I highly recommend The War Lovers: Roosevelt, Lodge, Hearst, and the Rush to Empire, 1898 by Evan Thomas detailing the Spanish-American War both in Cuba and in the Philippines. For the British, I wish Tuchman had spent just a bit more time on the Boer War. See The Boer War by Thomas Pakenham. I was aware of Germany's African Colonies, but now I'm scurrying to find a little more information on the "Hottentot Wars."
We have so much material available to us regarding WWI, we should be able to have reads to share throughout the Centary years.
Brava on an exquisitely informative review! I'm slowly cobbling mine together. :)
Mike wrote: "Your review is a joy to read, capturing the essence of Tuchman's achievement in writing of the coming of The Great War. Your comments regarding the journalistic approach of the author mirror revi..."
Thank you Mike,
Actually, I do not mind in general a journalistic approach to history. These books do a great service if they contribute to a wider knowledge buy a wider readership. I think I just had a bit of trouble with the first chapter--on the British upper classes. I found it a bit like a parody of Downton Abbey, paying too much attention to some of what Tuchman perceived as weird habits of the nobility, but not giving a clear enough idea of what was going on between the Conservative and the Liberal parties.
But, as I tried to explain in my review, it was at the end of reading her book that I got the overall idea of what her argument was and I think it was very clever.
This year I also plan to read her The Guns of August
Thank you for the recommendations for further reading... We will not be able to read everything (¡!!) but I think we are going to learn a lot this year.... On the Boer War it is also of interest to me because of the young Churchil’s involvement as a journalist and his imprisonment. Thank you for that reference too. I added both.
I am enjoying The Vertigo Years: Europe 1900-1914.
And I ordered Fussell's Illustrated volume....
Thank you Mike,
Actually, I do not mind in general a journalistic approach to history. These books do a great service if they contribute to a wider knowledge buy a wider readership. I think I just had a bit of trouble with the first chapter--on the British upper classes. I found it a bit like a parody of Downton Abbey, paying too much attention to some of what Tuchman perceived as weird habits of the nobility, but not giving a clear enough idea of what was going on between the Conservative and the Liberal parties.
But, as I tried to explain in my review, it was at the end of reading her book that I got the overall idea of what her argument was and I think it was very clever.
This year I also plan to read her The Guns of August
Thank you for the recommendations for further reading... We will not be able to read everything (¡!!) but I think we are going to learn a lot this year.... On the Boer War it is also of interest to me because of the young Churchil’s involvement as a journalist and his imprisonment. Thank you for that reference too. I added both.
I am enjoying The Vertigo Years: Europe 1900-1914.
And I ordered Fussell's Illustrated volume....
Hey, thanks for this review. I really wanted to read this one , but under the impression that it was a more unified work.
Riku wrote: "Hey, thanks for this review. I really wanted to read this one , but under the impression that it was a more unified work."
Thank you Riku. If you are interested in the subject I would still go for it. She does pull together an overall thesis which must have been behind her choice of topics for her essays. It is a "classic" now. I alsi plan to read her The Guns of August.
Thank you Riku. If you are interested in the subject I would still go for it. She does pull together an overall thesis which must have been behind her choice of topics for her essays. It is a "classic" now. I alsi plan to read her The Guns of August.
Kalliope wrote: "Riku wrote: "Hey, thanks for this review. I really wanted to read this one , but under the impression that it was a more unified work."
Thank you Riku. If you are interested in the subject I would..."
The titles are so catchy, that alone might have made them classics! How did you like March of Folly? I didn't take to that one much...
Thank you Riku. If you are interested in the subject I would..."
The titles are so catchy, that alone might have made them classics! How did you like March of Folly? I didn't take to that one much...
Riku wrote: "Kalliope wrote: "Riku wrote: "Hey, thanks for this review. I really wanted to read this one , but under the impression that it was a more unified work."
Thank you Riku. If you are interested in th..."
I have not read that one.. nor do I have it. Waiting for my attention is her A Distant Mirror: The Calamitous 14th Century.
But due to the more "popular" nature of her books, I chose it as my first in the year (or years) of reading around WW1.
Thank you Riku. If you are interested in th..."
I have not read that one.. nor do I have it. Waiting for my attention is her A Distant Mirror: The Calamitous 14th Century.
But due to the more "popular" nature of her books, I chose it as my first in the year (or years) of reading around WW1.
Garima wrote: "Yours is a well balanced review, Kalliope. Analytical and engaging."
Thank you Garima...
Thank you Garima...
I appreciate your review a lot. Helpful to me because I have been curious about it. The Distant Mirror and Guns of August were great reads for me, someone with huge gaps in historical understanding.
The social context driving war is of great interest to me to dispel the inevitability of war in human nature. (My early work on the neurobiology of aggression in animals was in a lab whose director was involved with the Seville Accord by UNESCO in the 60's that asserted war in humans is not biologically) determined).
The social context driving war is of great interest to me to dispel the inevitability of war in human nature. (My early work on the neurobiology of aggression in animals was in a lab whose director was involved with the Seville Accord by UNESCO in the 60's that asserted war in humans is not biologically) determined).
Michael wrote: "I appreciate your review a lot. Helpful to me because I have been curious about it. The Distant Mirror and Guns of August were great reads for me, someone with huge gaps in historical understandi..."
Michael, you could also consider The Vertigo Years: Europe 1900-1914 if you are interested in the social context... It is more complete than Tuchman's
Michael, you could also consider The Vertigo Years: Europe 1900-1914 if you are interested in the social context... It is more complete than Tuchman's
Your review of Proud Towers and WW1 books are insightful and beautifully written. I look forward to learning about WW1's history and, when the time comes, I will turn to you as a helpful guide. Having followed the comments, The Vertigo Years now has my attention (as does and Paris 1919). Great Review Kalliope
distorting nationalisms
We are not done with those yet, unfortunately.
coetaneous
I love learning new words.