Apatt's Reviews > To Say Nothing of the Dog
To Say Nothing of the Dog (Oxford Time Travel, #2)
by
by
We all like a good laugh don’t we? But for me, comedy works best in TV shows or movies. Humour in print works best in shorter formats, like cartoon strips or magazine articles. I tend to find “comic novels” (not to be confused with graphic novels) problematical. The trouble is I keep expecting to laugh at every page and that is a tall order for the authors. I don’t expect to be thrilled by every page of a thriller or to be scared by every page of a horror novel so I don’t know why I have such a high expectation of comic novels. Just a personal quirk I guess. Consequently, I tend to be less interested in comic novels because I find very few of them consistently funny through out the book.
To Say Nothing of the Dog is a comic sci-fi novel, and it is a good one. It is not in the same league as Douglas Adams
or Robert Sheckley mind bendingly funny sf but it is a pleasant read and the humour works well enough from time to time. The style of humour is reminiscent of classic comic novels by P.G. Wodehouse and Oscar Wilde. Of course the title of the book is a tribute to Jerome K. Jerome’s classic Three Men in a Boat, a book I kind of dislike (review). I found it to be tedious, tame and almost mirth-free. Probably not Jerome’s fault it just did not work for me. Having read “Three Men” out of curiosity and as a sort of preparation for reading To Say Nothing of the Dog my subsequent dislike of it does not bode well for Connie Willis’ book. On the other hand, I totally love her Doomsday Book, one of the finest sf books I read in the past few years. To Say Nothing of the Dog is part of Ms Willis' loosely connected Oxford Time Travel series which includes Doomsday Book but the tone is very different. While Doomsday Book is intense and tragic To Say Nothing of the Dog is almost entirely breezy. I persevered through the less than riveting first few chapters and eventually settled into enjoying the book.
It would be a mistake to expect To Say Nothing of the Dog to be a sci-fi version of or tribute to Jerome’s book. Ms. Willis is clearly influenced by more diverse material than just one book. Her love for the crime fiction of Agatha Christie
And Dorothy L. Sayers is also evident. Best of all she did not neglect the sci-fi aspect of it, the book went on to win the Hugo and Locus Awards in 1999, and also a Nebula Award nomination.
What raises To Say Nothing of the Dog far above Three Men in a Boat is that there is more to it than just trying to elicit laughter. There are the intriguing logic and logistics of time travelling which Willis beautifully worked out. The characters are also generally amiable and as something of an anglophile myself I enjoy the British culture references like jumble sales, the “tube trains” and the Jeevesian acerbic butler dialogue.
My only complaint is that for the most part there is very little sense of urgency to the proceeding (until the last two or three chapters). The lighthearted tone is maintained throughout the book and the story moves amiably at a leisurely pace. This led to my initial feeling that the novel is too tame, the stakes are too low. As it turns out all of time and space continuum is at stake and a sense of danger eventually appears toward the end as the main characters’ strive to repair “incongruities”, which is Willis’ term for time travelling paradoxes. I like that she is using a different term for these paradoxes from the standard time travelling stories it somehow makes the story seem more believable.
To Say Nothing of the Dog is not a laugh-a-minute book, it is not a complete success as a comic novel, but neither is it a failure. More importantly, as a lighthearted time travelling sci-fi novel it is worth a read. Just don’t go into it with the wrong expectations.
(3.5 stars)
To Say Nothing of the Dog is a comic sci-fi novel, and it is a good one. It is not in the same league as Douglas Adams
or Robert Sheckley mind bendingly funny sf but it is a pleasant read and the humour works well enough from time to time. The style of humour is reminiscent of classic comic novels by P.G. Wodehouse and Oscar Wilde. Of course the title of the book is a tribute to Jerome K. Jerome’s classic Three Men in a Boat, a book I kind of dislike (review). I found it to be tedious, tame and almost mirth-free. Probably not Jerome’s fault it just did not work for me. Having read “Three Men” out of curiosity and as a sort of preparation for reading To Say Nothing of the Dog my subsequent dislike of it does not bode well for Connie Willis’ book. On the other hand, I totally love her Doomsday Book, one of the finest sf books I read in the past few years. To Say Nothing of the Dog is part of Ms Willis' loosely connected Oxford Time Travel series which includes Doomsday Book but the tone is very different. While Doomsday Book is intense and tragic To Say Nothing of the Dog is almost entirely breezy. I persevered through the less than riveting first few chapters and eventually settled into enjoying the book.
It would be a mistake to expect To Say Nothing of the Dog to be a sci-fi version of or tribute to Jerome’s book. Ms. Willis is clearly influenced by more diverse material than just one book. Her love for the crime fiction of Agatha Christie
And Dorothy L. Sayers is also evident. Best of all she did not neglect the sci-fi aspect of it, the book went on to win the Hugo and Locus Awards in 1999, and also a Nebula Award nomination.
What raises To Say Nothing of the Dog far above Three Men in a Boat is that there is more to it than just trying to elicit laughter. There are the intriguing logic and logistics of time travelling which Willis beautifully worked out. The characters are also generally amiable and as something of an anglophile myself I enjoy the British culture references like jumble sales, the “tube trains” and the Jeevesian acerbic butler dialogue.
My only complaint is that for the most part there is very little sense of urgency to the proceeding (until the last two or three chapters). The lighthearted tone is maintained throughout the book and the story moves amiably at a leisurely pace. This led to my initial feeling that the novel is too tame, the stakes are too low. As it turns out all of time and space continuum is at stake and a sense of danger eventually appears toward the end as the main characters’ strive to repair “incongruities”, which is Willis’ term for time travelling paradoxes. I like that she is using a different term for these paradoxes from the standard time travelling stories it somehow makes the story seem more believable.
To Say Nothing of the Dog is not a laugh-a-minute book, it is not a complete success as a comic novel, but neither is it a failure. More importantly, as a lighthearted time travelling sci-fi novel it is worth a read. Just don’t go into it with the wrong expectations.
(3.5 stars)
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
To Say Nothing of the Dog.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
March 16, 2012
– Shelved
March 17, 2012
–
Started Reading
March 18, 2012
–
18.66%
"Too light weight, not particularly funny. This one is heading for suspended animation."
page
92
November 13, 2013
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-11 of 11 (11 new)
date
newest »
message 1:
by
Lyn
(new)
Jun 19, 2014 11:43AM
I've heard good things about this book and now your excellent review, will add this to the reading list, thanks
reply
|
flag
Lyn wrote: "I've heard good things about this book and now your excellent review, will add this to the reading list, thanks"
Thanks Lyn! I actually read this in 2013. In retrospect it's OK but I'm a little disappointed that it's not nearly as good asDoomsday Book.
Thanks Lyn! I actually read this in 2013. In retrospect it's OK but I'm a little disappointed that it's not nearly as good asDoomsday Book.
I liked this book very much. Perhaps I was simply in an agreeable mood, but I thought it hung together very well as a SF novel that happened to also be rather funny.
Joe wrote: "I liked this book very much. Perhaps I was simply in an agreeable mood, but I thought it hung together very well as a SF novel that happened to also be rather funny."
I certainly like it more than the book that inspired it, Three Men in a Boat, That one kinda sucks for me.
I certainly like it more than the book that inspired it, Three Men in a Boat, That one kinda sucks for me.
This was going to be my introduction to Connie Willis for the time travel ficton marathon I'm embarking on in the fall. I didn't know the novel was essentially comic in nature, but felt you made excellent points about the "comic novel", Apatt, which I think has a lot in common with the "joke book" and is not my favorite genre. Should I start off with The Doomsday Book instead?
Joe wrote: "This was going to be my introduction to Connie Willis for the time travel ficton marathon I'm embarking on in the fall. I didn't know the novel was essentially comic in nature, but felt you made ex..."
Oh Gawd Joe yes! One of the best sf books I ever read. My review of Doomsday Book.
Oh Gawd Joe yes! One of the best sf books I ever read. My review of Doomsday Book.
If you'd like something different and mind-blowing, try her first novel Lincoln's Dreams. It's short and an amazing work.