Sign in with Facebook
Eric Cepela's Reviews > The Erasers
The Erasers
by
by
everything and everyone in this book is a device. sterile. well constructed, like a bunker.
are nouveau roman and la nouvelle vague the same thing but novel and motion film, respectively? because it feels like a godard movie without the girl. Alphaville without anna.
the blurry transitions in narrative perspective are fun.
oh, what's up with "revolver"? repeated a hundred times. is that the translator's mistake? even has a picture of a revolver in the cover art of the edition i borrowed. the gun in question has a clip, jams, and can utilize a silencer. that's a pistol.
3 stars
are nouveau roman and la nouvelle vague the same thing but novel and motion film, respectively? because it feels like a godard movie without the girl. Alphaville without anna.
the blurry transitions in narrative perspective are fun.
oh, what's up with "revolver"? repeated a hundred times. is that the translator's mistake? even has a picture of a revolver in the cover art of the edition i borrowed. the gun in question has a clip, jams, and can utilize a silencer. that's a pistol.
3 stars
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The Erasers.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Comments Showing 1-4 of 4 (4 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Moved to Library Thing
(new)
-
added it
Mar 21, 2018 12:22PM
If a pistol appears in a story it must be fired. Maybe not so if it's a revolver?
reply
|
flag
Chekov uses the word ''pistol" and "rifle" interchangeably.
in the quote, not the story.
