Lawyer's Reviews > Blood Meridian, or, the Evening Redness in the West
Blood Meridian, or, the Evening Redness in the West
by
by
Lawyer's review
bookshelves: 19th-century, death, good-and-evil, historical-fiction, war, violence, scalp-hunters, mexico
Oct 31, 2011
bookshelves: 19th-century, death, good-and-evil, historical-fiction, war, violence, scalp-hunters, mexico
"Blood Meridian" is hellish nightmare of successive acts of violence. Based on the story of the Glanton Gang operating on boundary between Texas and Mexico in 1849-1850, McCarthy's novel focuses on an unnamed protagonist known only as "The Kid." The Kid is fourteen, a runaway from the hills of Tennessee. He finds himself among a group of Filibusterers bent on finishing what the Mexican War began. The band is attacked by Comanches. The Kid is among the few survivors. However, he survives only to find himself imprisoned by the Mexican government for his participation in the invasion of their territory. The Kid is released to become a member of the Glanton Gang to rid the Mexican populace of marauding Apaches. A bounty is paid for each scalp by the Mexican government.
Glanton and his band find themselves outnumbered and out of gunpowder. They are miraculously saved by "The Judge." The Judge seems to know of the gang's approach. He is waiting for them on top of a rock and witnesses their plight. The Judge ably mixes up a batch of gunpowder from nitre, sulfur, and urine. The powder is dried by the heat of the southwestern sun just in time to turn the massacre of the gang into a slaughter of the surprised Apaches.
If the Kid is the protagonist of "Blood Meridian," the antagonist is the Judge. At one time or another, each man in the gang has crossed paths with him, although they cannot remember just how the encounter occurred. The Judge is indifferent to the violence committed by the gang. He is also a participant and a killer of children. Violence is the nature of man, seems to be the Judge's estimation of humanity or the lack of it. At one point he says, “War was always here. Before man was, war waited for him. The ultimate trade awaiting its ultimate practitioner.”
In an interview of McCarthy conducted by Richard Woodard of the New York Times in 1992, the following appears: "There's no such thing as life without bloodshed," McCarthy says philosophically. "I think the notion that the species can be improved in some way, that everyone could live in harmony, is a really dangerous idea. Those who are afflicted with this notion are the first ones to give up their souls, their freedom. Your desire that it be that way will enslave you and make your life vacuous." See "Cormac McCarthy's Venomous Fiction" http://www.nytimes.com/books/98/05/17...
Eerily, at on point, the Judge proclaims, "Nothing exists without my consent." The Judge keeps a notebook handy, meticulously rendering drawings of antiquities and artifacts in his personal journal. After reproducing the item, making it his personal property, he destroys the original object, preventing its discovery by anyone else.
As the depredations of the Glanton gang continue to pile up, the Kid is an observer of the relentless violence, but is a relatively mute witness. It is only much later, after the demise of the gang that the Kid confesses to his participation in Glanton's murder of hostile and friendly Indians alike. To Glanton, a scalp was a scalp. Its origin was irrelevant as long as it produced a bounty.
Once the last page of "Blood Meridian" is turned the only conclusion to be reached is that evil exists in the world. One can react to it, participate in it, or be indifferent to it. In the final pages of the novel, the Judge dances to fiddlers in a brothel and saloon, proclaiming he will never die. And, perhaps that is true. Evil, not confronted never dies.
As to the fate of the Kid? By novel's end, the Judge refers to him as the Man and that he is sorely disappointed in him. What transpires in the Judge and the Kid's final meeting is ambiguous, subject to interpretation just as life will always be. That the Judge meant to possess the Kid is unquestionable. To the degree that the Judge took the Kid is open to question.
McCarthy concludes "Blood Meridian" with a curious epilogue. A lone figure treks across the desolate southwestern landscape, tapping holes into the ground, striking sparks with each blow. His identity is not revealed. But he is followed by a band of wanderers who observe him at his work. A symbol of fencing in the tractless wasteland, the bringing of civilization, or a matter of greed led by the Judge in his endless dance?
In another excerpt from the Woodard-McCarthy interview is McCarthy's observation: "The ugly fact is books are made out of books," he says. "The novel depends for its life on the novels that have been written." His list of those whom he calls the "good writers" -- Melville, Dostoyevsky, Faulkner -- precludes anyone who doesn't "deal with issues of life and death." Proust and Henry James don't make the cut. "I don't understand them," he says. "To me, that's not literature. A lot of writers who are considered good I consider strange."
"Blood Meridian" is a kaleidoscopic portrayal of the inevitability and existence of violence. It brings to mind the swirling violence of a Sam Peckinpah film, the paintings of Heironymous Bosch, and Conrad's "Heart of Darkness" as reconstructed in Coppola's "Apocalypse Now."
This may be the most disturbing book I've ever read. Yet, it will remain completely unforgettable.
Glanton and his band find themselves outnumbered and out of gunpowder. They are miraculously saved by "The Judge." The Judge seems to know of the gang's approach. He is waiting for them on top of a rock and witnesses their plight. The Judge ably mixes up a batch of gunpowder from nitre, sulfur, and urine. The powder is dried by the heat of the southwestern sun just in time to turn the massacre of the gang into a slaughter of the surprised Apaches.
If the Kid is the protagonist of "Blood Meridian," the antagonist is the Judge. At one time or another, each man in the gang has crossed paths with him, although they cannot remember just how the encounter occurred. The Judge is indifferent to the violence committed by the gang. He is also a participant and a killer of children. Violence is the nature of man, seems to be the Judge's estimation of humanity or the lack of it. At one point he says, “War was always here. Before man was, war waited for him. The ultimate trade awaiting its ultimate practitioner.”
In an interview of McCarthy conducted by Richard Woodard of the New York Times in 1992, the following appears: "There's no such thing as life without bloodshed," McCarthy says philosophically. "I think the notion that the species can be improved in some way, that everyone could live in harmony, is a really dangerous idea. Those who are afflicted with this notion are the first ones to give up their souls, their freedom. Your desire that it be that way will enslave you and make your life vacuous." See "Cormac McCarthy's Venomous Fiction" http://www.nytimes.com/books/98/05/17...
Eerily, at on point, the Judge proclaims, "Nothing exists without my consent." The Judge keeps a notebook handy, meticulously rendering drawings of antiquities and artifacts in his personal journal. After reproducing the item, making it his personal property, he destroys the original object, preventing its discovery by anyone else.
As the depredations of the Glanton gang continue to pile up, the Kid is an observer of the relentless violence, but is a relatively mute witness. It is only much later, after the demise of the gang that the Kid confesses to his participation in Glanton's murder of hostile and friendly Indians alike. To Glanton, a scalp was a scalp. Its origin was irrelevant as long as it produced a bounty.
Once the last page of "Blood Meridian" is turned the only conclusion to be reached is that evil exists in the world. One can react to it, participate in it, or be indifferent to it. In the final pages of the novel, the Judge dances to fiddlers in a brothel and saloon, proclaiming he will never die. And, perhaps that is true. Evil, not confronted never dies.
As to the fate of the Kid? By novel's end, the Judge refers to him as the Man and that he is sorely disappointed in him. What transpires in the Judge and the Kid's final meeting is ambiguous, subject to interpretation just as life will always be. That the Judge meant to possess the Kid is unquestionable. To the degree that the Judge took the Kid is open to question.
McCarthy concludes "Blood Meridian" with a curious epilogue. A lone figure treks across the desolate southwestern landscape, tapping holes into the ground, striking sparks with each blow. His identity is not revealed. But he is followed by a band of wanderers who observe him at his work. A symbol of fencing in the tractless wasteland, the bringing of civilization, or a matter of greed led by the Judge in his endless dance?
In another excerpt from the Woodard-McCarthy interview is McCarthy's observation: "The ugly fact is books are made out of books," he says. "The novel depends for its life on the novels that have been written." His list of those whom he calls the "good writers" -- Melville, Dostoyevsky, Faulkner -- precludes anyone who doesn't "deal with issues of life and death." Proust and Henry James don't make the cut. "I don't understand them," he says. "To me, that's not literature. A lot of writers who are considered good I consider strange."
"Blood Meridian" is a kaleidoscopic portrayal of the inevitability and existence of violence. It brings to mind the swirling violence of a Sam Peckinpah film, the paintings of Heironymous Bosch, and Conrad's "Heart of Darkness" as reconstructed in Coppola's "Apocalypse Now."
This may be the most disturbing book I've ever read. Yet, it will remain completely unforgettable.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Blood Meridian, or, the Evening Redness in the West.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
October 31, 2011
–
Started Reading
October 31, 2011
– Shelved
November 20, 2011
– Shelved as:
19th-century
November 20, 2011
– Shelved as:
death
November 20, 2011
– Shelved as:
historical-fiction
November 20, 2011
– Shelved as:
good-and-evil
November 20, 2011
– Shelved as:
war
November 20, 2011
– Shelved as:
violence
November 20, 2011
– Shelved as:
mexico
November 20, 2011
– Shelved as:
scalp-hunters
November 20, 2011
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-11 of 11 (11 new)
date
newest »
message 1:
by
Jeffrey
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Nov 01, 2011 08:14AM
Tough nosed book, but infinitely memorable. I bought a first for $60 in the early 1990s and thought I was crazy especially after scrounging for food for the next month, but looking back I think I might have made the right decision.
reply
|
flag
Great review as always. Melville, a great writer? well Mike now you will have to go back and reread Moby Dick. haha I on the other hand will have to hack my way through the tangled brier of another Faulkner.
Please, Br'er Jeff! Don't throw me in that briar patch! Put me on that Pequod with Ishmael and that crazy old Ahab man. *koff* Unlike Nathan Philbrick (putting on my body armor in anticipation of the yowls of the literati as they cast their harpoons against me) I can think of a good number of reasons NOT to re-read "Moby Dick." Reason number one: Oh, the man needed an EDITOR. YES! "Call me Ishmael," is the perfect opening line. But the ramblings of Ishmael's descriptions of the endless nitty details of whaling and sailing made me want to throttle Ishmael and his creator. Thank God, Faulkner had Albert Erskine, who happened to turn out to be McCarthy's editor for about twenty years.
Now then. I'm all better. Very well. I will re-read "Moby Dick" if you read THREE Faulkners. That amounts to about the same number of pages. HAH!
Now then. I'm all better. Very well. I will re-read "Moby Dick" if you read THREE Faulkners. That amounts to about the same number of pages. HAH!
Another stunning review. Glad you enjoyed this book, it is one of my favorites. So bleak and violent, yet so compelling.
This is an excellent review/critique. I might have to give it more than 3 stars because of it. I feel a little ambiguous about the rating system anyhow. I liked the book so, 3 stars, but didn't love it. However, I think it's a great work of literature. Guess I might say the same thing of Kafka's "The Trial."
Again, I got more out of your review than my own reading of the book. Lots for me to consider.......
A terrific review, Mike. I won't forget this book, though I do wish I could scrub some of the images from my mind.
Fine review, Mike. I didn't get around to reading this one until this year and it pretty much blew me away.
Zoeytron wrote: "Fine review, Mike. I didn't get around to reading this one until this year and it pretty much blew me away."
My thanks, Ms. Z. I do enjoy McCarthy! This one is among his toughest, emotionally, I think. I appreciate your kind words.
My thanks, Ms. Z. I do enjoy McCarthy! This one is among his toughest, emotionally, I think. I appreciate your kind words.
Thanks for the review Mike. Many things to consider. Things I missed. Things I'm not smart enough to understand.
This is a 1 star book for me. I did not like it. It still rattles around in my brain. It is still with me years later. Must be a better book than I give it credit for. I wonder what kind of sick f could write something like this. To find this story. To have this story pull them forward into writing it. That's some strong dedication.
This is a 1 star book for me. I did not like it. It still rattles around in my brain. It is still with me years later. Must be a better book than I give it credit for. I wonder what kind of sick f could write something like this. To find this story. To have this story pull them forward into writing it. That's some strong dedication.
John wrote: "Thanks for the review Mike. Many things to consider. Things I missed. Things I'm not smart enough to understand.
This is a 1 star book for me. I did not like it. It still rattles around in my brain..."
John, it's good to hear from you. I certainly feel this is a very disturbing read. It definitely left me rattled. I highly recommend the article on McCarthy's venomous fiction. One thing that adds to how disturbing this book is is the fact that it is based on historical fact--the Glanton Gang.
This is a 1 star book for me. I did not like it. It still rattles around in my brain..."
John, it's good to hear from you. I certainly feel this is a very disturbing read. It definitely left me rattled. I highly recommend the article on McCarthy's venomous fiction. One thing that adds to how disturbing this book is is the fact that it is based on historical fact--the Glanton Gang.