Bill Kerwin's Reviews > Rebecca
Rebecca
by
A woman, a man, another woman's shadow; a landscape, a house, a hidden history. These six elements have informed the gothic impulse from Udolpho and Jane Eyre to The Thirteenth Tale. Daphne du Maurier's Rebecca is crucial to the genre, for in it du Maurier simplified and organized these six elements, refining the narrative, concentrating the mythic, and enriching the ambiguity of her tale.
What du Maurier understood is that the heart of the romantic gothic is the struggle between two women, one waking up to a new life and one not content to remain a ghost. The man may be their conflicting goal, the house and landscape their arena, but it is the battle between these two women, for life and power and autonomy, that is the essence of the tale.
In Rebecca, the man is the haunted, moody Maxim de Winter who has married a never-named young woman--a naive paid companion--whom he has met during a recent stay in Monte Carlo. The two return to Maxim's ancestral estate of Manderley, but the new wife soon finds the old house and grounds--as well as the mind of her increasingly melancholy husband--dominated by the spirit of Rebecca, his dead first wife.
The author's simplifying genius resides in the fact that in Rebecca the spirit of the dead woman animates the house and the landscape and obsesses the man. Consequently, every attempt of the new Mrs. de Winter--the narrator--to adjust to the house and staff (including the daunting housekeeper, Mrs. Danvers), to explore the house and grounds, or to comprehend the past events that interfere with her present happiness are part of the novel's central struggle and its secret history. The second Mrs. de Winter's descriptions may be nuanced and leisurely, occasionally painful in their innocence, but every encounter, each exploration, brings us closer to the heart of the mystery of Rebecca and Manderley too.
Beside the exemplary construction of the narrative, the other things I liked most about the book were the detailed descriptions of Manderley, the lingering power of the first two chapters (the only two set in the present), and the intriguingly ambiguous fate of the narrator of the novel, the second Mrs. de Winter, the woman with no name.
One of the guilty pleasures of a good gothic is the description of a magnificent old house, so precise and rich in detail that you can fantasize about how delightful--or how scary--living in such a mansion might be. Manderly is a place that comes alive for the reader, and it is particularly pleasant to have it described to us by a person who is experiencing it--and attempting to master it--for the first time.
The first chapter is justly famous for the narrator's account of a dream in which she returns to the now ruined Manderley estate. Its description of overgrown nature reclaiming the martyred grandeur of Manderley is an expertly executed mood piece, inaugurating the narrative as effectively as any opening passage in literature. (I do not exclude my favorites: the first scene of Hamlet, the first chapter of Bleak House, and the description of the Sternwood mansion in the first pages of The Big Sleep).
Personally, though, I find the second chapter of the book even more interesting. It describes Maxim and the narrator--who now calls the two of them "happy"--as they live their life on the continent in a series of hotels. But something about our narrator's description strikes me as inexpressibly sad: the two of them sound to me like an affluent, aging couple, frittering their final years away on superficial pleasures and trivial pastimes. Yet the wife, the woman who is telling us this--we find out later--is now barely in her thirties. Could this indeed be "happiness"? This question continued to haunt me throughout my reading of the book, and even now affects my shifting impressions of its themes.
I ask myself, weeks after finishing this novel, what is the narrator's fate? Has she achieved a certain degree of happiness--however modest--having triumphed over the dominating Rebecca, having gained the haunted Maxim for her own? Has she merely accepted the empty social forms and dull routine that Rebecca--whatever her sins might have been--was fighting so furiously against? Or is she "happy"--the interpretation I currently flirt with--because she, in her passive-aggressive way, dominates Maxim in his reduced state more thoroughly than Rebecca ever could? Even so, isn't such happiness inferior to the promise she once showed briefly, when she believed she could still be mistress of Manderley--after Rebecca's ghost had been exorcised, before she learned their world had burned down?
I don't know the answers to these questions, and I must say I like it that way. For me, at least, the novel will always be haunted by ambiguities, and that is a good thing. It is one of the reasons I find Rebecca such a rich, rewarding work.
by
A woman, a man, another woman's shadow; a landscape, a house, a hidden history. These six elements have informed the gothic impulse from Udolpho and Jane Eyre to The Thirteenth Tale. Daphne du Maurier's Rebecca is crucial to the genre, for in it du Maurier simplified and organized these six elements, refining the narrative, concentrating the mythic, and enriching the ambiguity of her tale.
What du Maurier understood is that the heart of the romantic gothic is the struggle between two women, one waking up to a new life and one not content to remain a ghost. The man may be their conflicting goal, the house and landscape their arena, but it is the battle between these two women, for life and power and autonomy, that is the essence of the tale.
In Rebecca, the man is the haunted, moody Maxim de Winter who has married a never-named young woman--a naive paid companion--whom he has met during a recent stay in Monte Carlo. The two return to Maxim's ancestral estate of Manderley, but the new wife soon finds the old house and grounds--as well as the mind of her increasingly melancholy husband--dominated by the spirit of Rebecca, his dead first wife.
The author's simplifying genius resides in the fact that in Rebecca the spirit of the dead woman animates the house and the landscape and obsesses the man. Consequently, every attempt of the new Mrs. de Winter--the narrator--to adjust to the house and staff (including the daunting housekeeper, Mrs. Danvers), to explore the house and grounds, or to comprehend the past events that interfere with her present happiness are part of the novel's central struggle and its secret history. The second Mrs. de Winter's descriptions may be nuanced and leisurely, occasionally painful in their innocence, but every encounter, each exploration, brings us closer to the heart of the mystery of Rebecca and Manderley too.
Beside the exemplary construction of the narrative, the other things I liked most about the book were the detailed descriptions of Manderley, the lingering power of the first two chapters (the only two set in the present), and the intriguingly ambiguous fate of the narrator of the novel, the second Mrs. de Winter, the woman with no name.
One of the guilty pleasures of a good gothic is the description of a magnificent old house, so precise and rich in detail that you can fantasize about how delightful--or how scary--living in such a mansion might be. Manderly is a place that comes alive for the reader, and it is particularly pleasant to have it described to us by a person who is experiencing it--and attempting to master it--for the first time.
The first chapter is justly famous for the narrator's account of a dream in which she returns to the now ruined Manderley estate. Its description of overgrown nature reclaiming the martyred grandeur of Manderley is an expertly executed mood piece, inaugurating the narrative as effectively as any opening passage in literature. (I do not exclude my favorites: the first scene of Hamlet, the first chapter of Bleak House, and the description of the Sternwood mansion in the first pages of The Big Sleep).
Personally, though, I find the second chapter of the book even more interesting. It describes Maxim and the narrator--who now calls the two of them "happy"--as they live their life on the continent in a series of hotels. But something about our narrator's description strikes me as inexpressibly sad: the two of them sound to me like an affluent, aging couple, frittering their final years away on superficial pleasures and trivial pastimes. Yet the wife, the woman who is telling us this--we find out later--is now barely in her thirties. Could this indeed be "happiness"? This question continued to haunt me throughout my reading of the book, and even now affects my shifting impressions of its themes.
I ask myself, weeks after finishing this novel, what is the narrator's fate? Has she achieved a certain degree of happiness--however modest--having triumphed over the dominating Rebecca, having gained the haunted Maxim for her own? Has she merely accepted the empty social forms and dull routine that Rebecca--whatever her sins might have been--was fighting so furiously against? Or is she "happy"--the interpretation I currently flirt with--because she, in her passive-aggressive way, dominates Maxim in his reduced state more thoroughly than Rebecca ever could? Even so, isn't such happiness inferior to the promise she once showed briefly, when she believed she could still be mistress of Manderley--after Rebecca's ghost had been exorcised, before she learned their world had burned down?
I don't know the answers to these questions, and I must say I like it that way. For me, at least, the novel will always be haunted by ambiguities, and that is a good thing. It is one of the reasons I find Rebecca such a rich, rewarding work.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Rebecca.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Comments Showing 1-50 of 53 (53 new)
message 1:
by
Amanda
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Jul 22, 2016 05:12AM
Love this read.
reply
|
flag
You may be aware that I love this book. But I think the cat is dead. Whenever it's mentioned, it's motionless in its basket.
Mrs. Danvers wrote: "You may be aware that I love this book. But I think the cat is dead. Whenever it's mentioned, it's motionless in its basket."
Could be dead. But it could be asleep. I've got three of them at home, and I notice they sleep a lot. Except when it's food time of course.
Could be dead. But it could be asleep. I've got three of them at home, and I notice they sleep a lot. Except when it's food time of course.
LOL same here. My impression of the cat may reflect that my last reading of Rebecca was an audiobook, and repeated phrases seem much more obvious when a book is read aloud. ;-)
Mrs. Danvers wrote: "LOL same here. My impression of the cat may reflect that my last reading of Rebecca was an audiobook, and repeated phrases seem much more obvious when a book is read aloud. ;-)"
I hate to admit it, but I didn't even remember the cat.
I hate to admit it, but I didn't even remember the cat.
There was no cat. Just two dogs. And a house that was as much a character in the novel as the people.
Best review of Rebecca I have ever read. I have had a passion for this book for most of my life. One of those read and read again books for me.
The man may be their conflicting goal, the house and landscape their arena, but it is the battle between these two women, for life and power and autonomy, that is the essence of the tale. I agree with this completely! Rebecca remains one of my favourite books, ever; the titular Rebecca's presence as the other woman, even in her death, is more powerful than any other other woman portrayed in the other books you've mentioned. You're also utterly right about the ambiguity of the ending of the novel; you really don't know if there was a happily ever after for the narrator. I think it's the sheer imperfection of the characters and the incompleteness of the book that makes it such a classic.
If half the purpose of a book review is to share a great work with others, it's mission accomplished. Can't wait to read. Tremendous review.
Brilliant review, Bill. I love the book too but I could not have described it or its effects as eloquently as you - thanks.
A marvelous story drowned in endless digressions. Du Maurier never wrote a sentence she did not want to share with her long suffering readers.
William wrote: "Fabulous review, Will. Thank you. What did you think of the 1940 Hitchcock version?"
I like it very much, particularly Judith Anderson as Mrs. Danvers.
I like it very much, particularly Judith Anderson as Mrs. Danvers.
Thank you, Bill - very much enjoyed reading your review. Made me want to reread Rebecca. I think it is du Maurier's best book, precisely for the reasons you've specified - it leaves a satisfying sense of mystery that you can return to in your thoughts again and again.
Having said that, The Progress of Julius is another fine novel by du Maurier and even The Scapegoat is interesting.
Having said that, The Progress of Julius is another fine novel by du Maurier and even The Scapegoat is interesting.
Tina wrote: "Thank you, Bill - very much enjoyed reading your review. Made me want to reread Rebecca. I think it is du Maurier's best book, precisely for the reasons you've specified - it leaves a satisfying se..."
Hi Tina
You should try 'My Cousin Rachel' s well. very powerful. She knew how to tell a gripping story!
regards
Gary
Hi Tina
You should try 'My Cousin Rachel' s well. very powerful. She knew how to tell a gripping story!
regards
Gary
Elyse wrote: "I enjoyed reading your review --and I'll sit with these questions! Thanks"
Glad you enjoyed it!
Glad you enjoyed it!
I remember i was so into the book and Rebecca's fate that i started reading Mrs De Winter by Susan Hill almost immediately. And yes thats where i learnt a lesson, if the good book is finished in such a point, there had to be a reason :))
Daphne du Maurier never wrote a sentence she didn't want to share with her readers. Her many pointless digressions dilute the power of what could have been the finest Gothic novel ever.
Wonderful review! And an absolutely gorgeous book. I love those dream-like swirls of prose, and that haunting ambiguity.
Great review, Bill. In the end, I felt that the narrator had simply traded one life of servitude in for another--if she'd stayed in the employ of the obnoxious old lady, she might have at least developed other possibilities, instead of constantly on the run with an older, haunted man...
Great review Bill! I just finished this book last week. It's one of my favorites that I've read over and over but a good review can really unlock a story.
What an interesting review. This is a novel I have read many times and will now re-read with your ideas in mind
It seems to me that putting Hamlet and Rebbeca in the same grading category implies a lack of discrimination.
Dirk wrote: "It seems to me that putting Hamlet and Rebbeca in the same grading category implies a lack of discrimination."
Not a lack of discrimination, but a lack of stars. If they gave us ten instead of five, perhaps I could manage the distinctions. At any rate, Rebecca is the best example of romantic 20th Century gothic there is, so it is a 5 star within its sub genre.
Still, I see your point. It is a compromise I am not entirely happy with. Like many other things in life.
Not a lack of discrimination, but a lack of stars. If they gave us ten instead of five, perhaps I could manage the distinctions. At any rate, Rebecca is the best example of romantic 20th Century gothic there is, so it is a 5 star within its sub genre.
Still, I see your point. It is a compromise I am not entirely happy with. Like many other things in life.
This is such a wonderful review, Bill, of one of my favorite books. You've truly captured that haunting sense of ambiguity that suffuses every page, and also something more: the almost wistful sadness that's there, between the lines, the sense that while the story is over (at the time of the narrator's telling), it will never be--for her or for us--ever concluded.
Michael wrote: "This is such a wonderful review ... the almost wistful sadness that's there [in the book], between the lines, the sense that while the story is over (at the time of the narrator's telling), it will never be--for her or for us--ever concluded. "
Glad you liked the review.
I like your comment too, about how the story never being concluded. It's like a recurring dream, a psychic scar, more ambiguous and insidious that it initially appears to be.
Glad you liked the review.
I like your comment too, about how the story never being concluded. It's like a recurring dream, a psychic scar, more ambiguous and insidious that it initially appears to be.
I have held off reading this one for decades, and now that I am older and more physically broken down, and yet more solid mentally (maybe), I still feel no strong urge to read this. Strange feeling. Your review does satisfy any urge I might have, at least for a while! Thank you!
I am fascinated by the way you find new insights into even the best known books, and new ways in which to reveal them.
There is a second book Mrs. Dancers that answers some of your questions. However I think Mrs. Dancers is a east of time I did not thank the new writer had a clue into Maxim and his new bride.
Lisa wrote: "I'm lost what is all the talk about a cat? There were two dogs."
As I said above, I have no memory of a cat. No wonder....there is no cat.
As I said above, I have no memory of a cat. No wonder....there is no cat.
Like² your review and the crisp commentary of the finer points of Ms. du Maurier’s literary achievement. Thank you.
Sleepydrummer wrote: "Like² your review and the crisp commentary of the finer points of Ms. du Maurier’s literary achievement. Thank you."
Glad you liked it!
Glad you liked it!
Very interesting, Bill. I'd be fascinaated to know what you make of 'Jamaica Inn', with that ending that always seemed weirdly ambiguous to me.