Roger Brunyate's Reviews > Lincoln in the Bardo
Lincoln in the Bardo
by
Read It Again!
There is something to be said, I think, for reading this four times. Not that I have done so, but two and a bit, and very glad I did. My first time was just a matter of figuring out how the thing works; my four-star account of this experience last year is reprinted below. The second—in my case incomplete—was listening to the CD audiobook, which treats the whole thing as a playscript, with the participation of a large number of actors, famous or otherwise. My third was to read it quite quickly, though slowing down for the denser passages; I found this immensely helpful, lifting me to five stars without shadow of doubt. The fourth, if I ever get to it, would be a slow reading throughout, to marvel at Saunders' language, sense of detail, and minor plot points that one tends to miss in the midst of so much richness.
Stage Four must come later, but for now, I will give my original review (Stage One), followed by a brief report on Stages Two and Three.
======
Stage One: Original Review
A Choral Requiem
Saunders' narrative method allows for real voices to be included among the fictional ones; the only distinction is that each actual quotation is given a bibliographical citation.* I found these parts of the story quietly powerful. We get glimpses of the boy lying sick upstairs at the White House while a gala reception goes on below. We hear from butlers, maids, grooms, and graveyard keepers as the funeral takes place, and later as the President returns alone at night. We get hints of the horror as Americans on both sides recognize the likely scale of the new Civil War and (surprisingly to me) raise their voices against "America's most reviled President." And finally, Saunders suggests that Lincoln's experience in the graveyard might have made him a stronger and more compassionate leader. Virtually none of the words in these sections are Saunders' own, but he proves himself a master orchestrator of borrowed voices.
I only wish I had liked the fictional voices more. Vollman, Bevins, and Thomas remain the principal commentators, but there are a score of others, male and female, white and black, violent or pathetic, gentle, aggressive, racist, or obscene. They are confusing at first, as we don't know how long each has been there, or what it will take to have them released. Gradually, we do discover the back-stories of several of these beings, and even glean some shreds of character. But too few of them are rounded out, too many are mere types; too often the chorus can become cacophony. And while the swift repartee keeps the book moving swiftly, its underlying humor verges more than once on camp.
So how to rate this? I read with admiration throughout, and with wonder at Saunders' originality and skill: five stars. But I was often confused, occasionally impatient, and seldom emotionally engaged: three stars at best. On the other hand, both the historical and imagined scenes involving Abraham Lincoln were consistently strong, and there were passages towards the end where the always-good writing rose to true excellence. So let me end with one of these, from the farewell of Roger Bevins, to justify my rating of four stars, indeed a high four:
*I now learn (from reports of an interview that is not included in my edition) that while all the bibliographical citations I bothered to check are indeed real, Saunders also felt free to insert some quasi-real voices of his own. Which is fine, because they all contributed, and sure fooled me!
======
Stage Two: The Audiobook
Unlike any normal audiobook, this is virtually a radio play, with a huge cast of characters. Nick Offerman is Hans Vollman, David Sedaris is Roger Blevins, and the author himself reads Rev. Everly Thomas. Actors of the like of Julianne Moore, Ben Stiller, Susan Sarandon, and Don Cheadle take smaller roles. I assume it was directed by Saunders himself, for the readings made great sense of the occasionally idiosyncratic punctuation and spacing, which sound more natural than it looks on the page. A narrator (Cassandra Campbell) duly announces each new chapter and the bibliographic citations after each speaker, which I suppose is necessary, but it really slows the pace; I was glad she drops out when speakers alternate quickly.
Indeed, it was the question of pace that made me stop my continuous listening, and turn instead to sampling certain chapters. Had this been my only acquaintance with the book, the audio might have worked really well. But already knowing it, and following along with the text, I resented being made to linger over passages that I could already see in front of me, and not being able to pause over new discoveries.
======
Stage Three: A Rapid Reading
Reading the book in print for the second time, often quite quickly, gave me a much clearer view of its varied textures and interlacing narrative arcs. There are four main textures: first, the historical sources giving facts about President Lincoln and the death of his son; second, the imagined scenes of Lincoln in the graveyard and his thoughts there; third, the lives (or whatever they are) of the three principal ghosts; and fourth, the chorus of all the other inhabitants. I was struck by how well Saunders varied the pace, alternating blocks of historical citations with sections of sheer invention. Or within the world of the Bardo, how rhythmically he would alternate the principals (Vollman, Blevins, and Thomas) with the chorus. I also noted that, in their role as the principal observers of Abraham and Willie Lincoln, the main ghosts served to link the worlds of the living and the almost-dead.
It's awful to admit it, but the first time I read this, I'm not sure I understood the shape or even all the stories of the various narratives. Looking from more of a distance, I could now see clearly how the novel is articulated by the two visits Lincoln makes to the graveyard after it had officially closed, and the tension involved in stopping him from leaving until Willie's fate was resolved. Against this, there is a shorter arc, which appears late and climaxes quickly; this is his awareness of the African-American people, and the compunction placed upon him to pursue the war.
The longest arcs of all, though, are those of the three main narrators, each of whom reaches a moment of epiphany late in the book. I got the beauty of these at first reading, but I did not fully understand what was keeping each of the three in the Bardo, and what they must do to be released. Now I do. I was also much more aware of the dozen minor characters whose own back-stories, graveyard encounters, and resolutions form little short-story units within the novel as a whole. In short, I began to sense for the first time how intricate yet controlled this structure is. Truly a work of genius!
by
Roger Brunyate's review
bookshelves: fantasy-surreal, history, sui-generis, top-ten-2017
Jul 16, 2017
bookshelves: fantasy-surreal, history, sui-generis, top-ten-2017
Read 2 times. Last read September 13, 2018 to September 15, 2018.
Read It Again!
There is something to be said, I think, for reading this four times. Not that I have done so, but two and a bit, and very glad I did. My first time was just a matter of figuring out how the thing works; my four-star account of this experience last year is reprinted below. The second—in my case incomplete—was listening to the CD audiobook, which treats the whole thing as a playscript, with the participation of a large number of actors, famous or otherwise. My third was to read it quite quickly, though slowing down for the denser passages; I found this immensely helpful, lifting me to five stars without shadow of doubt. The fourth, if I ever get to it, would be a slow reading throughout, to marvel at Saunders' language, sense of detail, and minor plot points that one tends to miss in the midst of so much richness.
Stage Four must come later, but for now, I will give my original review (Stage One), followed by a brief report on Stages Two and Three.
======
Stage One: Original Review
A Choral Requiem
An exceedingly tall and unkempt fellow was making his way toward us through the darkness.George Saunders' extraordinary book reads more like a verse drama or musical score than a conventional novel. It is a symphony of voices, both real and imagined, a choral requiem. They are acknowledged in small print after each paragraph; this particular conversation involves a middle-aged master printer (Hans Vollman), a gay printer's apprentice (Roger Bevins III), and the Reverend Everly Thomas. All three are dead, ghosts in a limbo occupied by spirits who have not allowed themselves, or been allowed, to pass on; Tibetans call this the "Bardo." The date is February 1862, the setting a cemetery in Georgetown, and the "exceedingly tall and unkempt fellow" is Abraham Lincoln, come to visit the tomb of his eldest son Willie, dead of typhus at eleven years of age.
This was highly irregular. It was after hours; the front gate would be locked.
The boy had been delivered only that day. That is to say, the man has most likely been here—
Quite recently.
That afternoon.
Highly irregular.
The gentleman seemed lost. Several time he stopped, looked about, retraced his steps, reversed course.
He was softly sobbing.
Saunders' narrative method allows for real voices to be included among the fictional ones; the only distinction is that each actual quotation is given a bibliographical citation.* I found these parts of the story quietly powerful. We get glimpses of the boy lying sick upstairs at the White House while a gala reception goes on below. We hear from butlers, maids, grooms, and graveyard keepers as the funeral takes place, and later as the President returns alone at night. We get hints of the horror as Americans on both sides recognize the likely scale of the new Civil War and (surprisingly to me) raise their voices against "America's most reviled President." And finally, Saunders suggests that Lincoln's experience in the graveyard might have made him a stronger and more compassionate leader. Virtually none of the words in these sections are Saunders' own, but he proves himself a master orchestrator of borrowed voices.
I only wish I had liked the fictional voices more. Vollman, Bevins, and Thomas remain the principal commentators, but there are a score of others, male and female, white and black, violent or pathetic, gentle, aggressive, racist, or obscene. They are confusing at first, as we don't know how long each has been there, or what it will take to have them released. Gradually, we do discover the back-stories of several of these beings, and even glean some shreds of character. But too few of them are rounded out, too many are mere types; too often the chorus can become cacophony. And while the swift repartee keeps the book moving swiftly, its underlying humor verges more than once on camp.
So how to rate this? I read with admiration throughout, and with wonder at Saunders' originality and skill: five stars. But I was often confused, occasionally impatient, and seldom emotionally engaged: three stars at best. On the other hand, both the historical and imagined scenes involving Abraham Lincoln were consistently strong, and there were passages towards the end where the always-good writing rose to true excellence. So let me end with one of these, from the farewell of Roger Bevins, to justify my rating of four stars, indeed a high four:
Though the things of the world were strong with me still.
Such as, for example: a gaggle of children trudging through a side-blown December flurry; a friendly match-share beneath some collision-tilted streetlight; a frozen closk, bird-visited within its high tower; cold water from a tin jug; toweling off one's clinging shirt post-June rain.
Pearls, rags, buttons, rug-tuft, beer-froth.
Someone's kind wishes for you; someone remembering to write; someone noticing that you are not at all at ease.
A bloody roast death-red on a platter; a hedgetop under-hand as you flee late to some chalk-and-woodfire-smelling schoolhouse.
Geese above, clover below, the sound of one's own breath when winded.
The way a moistness in the eye will blur a field of stars; the sore place on the shoulder a resting toboggan makes; writing one's beloved's name upon a frosted window with a gloved finger.
Tying a shoe; tying a knot on a package; a mouth on yours; a hand on yours; the ending of the day; the beginning of the day; the feeling that there will always be a day ahead.
Goodbye, I must now say goodbye to all of it.
*I now learn (from reports of an interview that is not included in my edition) that while all the bibliographical citations I bothered to check are indeed real, Saunders also felt free to insert some quasi-real voices of his own. Which is fine, because they all contributed, and sure fooled me!
======
Stage Two: The Audiobook
Unlike any normal audiobook, this is virtually a radio play, with a huge cast of characters. Nick Offerman is Hans Vollman, David Sedaris is Roger Blevins, and the author himself reads Rev. Everly Thomas. Actors of the like of Julianne Moore, Ben Stiller, Susan Sarandon, and Don Cheadle take smaller roles. I assume it was directed by Saunders himself, for the readings made great sense of the occasionally idiosyncratic punctuation and spacing, which sound more natural than it looks on the page. A narrator (Cassandra Campbell) duly announces each new chapter and the bibliographic citations after each speaker, which I suppose is necessary, but it really slows the pace; I was glad she drops out when speakers alternate quickly.
Indeed, it was the question of pace that made me stop my continuous listening, and turn instead to sampling certain chapters. Had this been my only acquaintance with the book, the audio might have worked really well. But already knowing it, and following along with the text, I resented being made to linger over passages that I could already see in front of me, and not being able to pause over new discoveries.
======
Stage Three: A Rapid Reading
Reading the book in print for the second time, often quite quickly, gave me a much clearer view of its varied textures and interlacing narrative arcs. There are four main textures: first, the historical sources giving facts about President Lincoln and the death of his son; second, the imagined scenes of Lincoln in the graveyard and his thoughts there; third, the lives (or whatever they are) of the three principal ghosts; and fourth, the chorus of all the other inhabitants. I was struck by how well Saunders varied the pace, alternating blocks of historical citations with sections of sheer invention. Or within the world of the Bardo, how rhythmically he would alternate the principals (Vollman, Blevins, and Thomas) with the chorus. I also noted that, in their role as the principal observers of Abraham and Willie Lincoln, the main ghosts served to link the worlds of the living and the almost-dead.
It's awful to admit it, but the first time I read this, I'm not sure I understood the shape or even all the stories of the various narratives. Looking from more of a distance, I could now see clearly how the novel is articulated by the two visits Lincoln makes to the graveyard after it had officially closed, and the tension involved in stopping him from leaving until Willie's fate was resolved. Against this, there is a shorter arc, which appears late and climaxes quickly; this is his awareness of the African-American people, and the compunction placed upon him to pursue the war.
The longest arcs of all, though, are those of the three main narrators, each of whom reaches a moment of epiphany late in the book. I got the beauty of these at first reading, but I did not fully understand what was keeping each of the three in the Bardo, and what they must do to be released. Now I do. I was also much more aware of the dozen minor characters whose own back-stories, graveyard encounters, and resolutions form little short-story units within the novel as a whole. In short, I began to sense for the first time how intricate yet controlled this structure is. Truly a work of genius!
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Lincoln in the Bardo.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
June 20, 2016
– Shelved
June 20, 2016
– Shelved as:
to-read
July 4, 2017
– Shelved as:
pending-library
July 13, 2017
–
Started Reading
July 15, 2017
–
Finished Reading
July 16, 2017
– Shelved as:
fantasy-surreal
July 16, 2017
– Shelved as:
history
July 16, 2017
– Shelved as:
sui-generis
December 30, 2017
– Shelved as:
top-ten-2017
September 13, 2018
–
Started Reading
September 15, 2018
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-29 of 29 (29 new)
date
newest »
message 1:
by
Katie
(new)
-
added it
Jul 16, 2017 02:00PM
Another masterpiece of a review, Roger. So helpful too for someone like me who has been dithering about reading this.
reply
|
flag
The audiobook has a different person for each voice and is well worth listening to. I think it actually improves the experience!
"A symphony of voices " - I really like that . I don't listen to audio books but a couple of Goodreads friends have said that it is wonderful , like a performance. I may have to give it a try one of these days .
I agree that the fictional voices were confusing, especially in the beginning. I enjoyed the audio version even more, because I stopped trying to figure out whose voice I was listening to and just enjoyed the story. The sections you quoted in your review are wonderful representations of the book. I always appreciate reading your perspective!
Thanks, all! I am by profession an opera director, and of course I was reading this to a certain extent as a play script. Hearing the music was more difficult, because it is not condensed enough. But I can imagine, if Saunders ever permitted it, that some composer could work very successfully with a very much reduced subset of the text here.
However, my professional affiliation also gave me problems. You buy a score of an opera only in order to perform that opera (or to follow along with someone else's performance); the same thing with a play; in neither case is the reading experience the primary medium. So if LINCOLN works even better on audio (and I can well believe it), why did the author ever issue it as a book? R.
However, my professional affiliation also gave me problems. You buy a score of an opera only in order to perform that opera (or to follow along with someone else's performance); the same thing with a play; in neither case is the reading experience the primary medium. So if LINCOLN works even better on audio (and I can well believe it), why did the author ever issue it as a book? R.
Good question. I read somewhere that they started recording the audiobook in the "normal" way i.e. someone (Saunders?) reading it. Then Saunders had the idea part way through of using a different narrator for each voice. It took the publishers a while to work out how to do it and how to get enough people. So, I sort of think the answer is that no one thought of it until after the book was already out there. Of course, that raises the equally valid question as to why no one thought of something that is so obvious once it is there.
Excellent review, Roger. I like reading your reactions to various aspects of the book and how they shaped the rating you gave. The lines you quoted were so beautiful.
Well, Roger, we agree to disagree. The book had a profound effect on me. Interestingly, I didn't dwell much on Lincoln (it seems that readers who came into the book with expectations of learning more about Abe Lincoln were inevitably disappointed) and more of the cacophony of voices. It reminded me, a tiny bit, of McMasters' Spoon Anthology. The voices at first were merged and hard to make out--like background noise--and then gradually, little bits rose to the surface, humanizing the individual speakers and building empathy-- at least, for me. Lincoln was one of the many mourners, but his story was insightful about the letting go process. I thought this was one of the most brilliant contemporary books I've read, in terms of structure and intent.
True enough. With your background, you would have enjoyed George Saunders' reenactment of this book. When I saw him in Chicago, he brought a choir along and the book really sprang to life.
Great review, as usual, Roger. I enioyed that crescendo of voices, the dialogues, the apparent mistery about place and fate. I found touching, perhaps more than Lincoln’s grief, the attachment to life that binds the souls to that sort of timeless land, that results from the fusion of Purgatory and tibetan Bardo
It is certainly a brilliant book, Patrizia. I am wondering, now, why I did not quite join the general chorus of raves. I see, though, that you stopped at four starts also; I'll go and take a look at your reasons. R.
I had been wondering about this book, and even if you were not fully convinced to award the 5 stars, you make it a very attractive reading... So, may be I will get to it.
Sounds like a fascinating concept, Roger, though it'a book I'd never read.
I find I do now have the top 2 books on your TOP 10 list and will definitely get to those, with thanks to you for your recommendations. (I have peeked at them, and I am fascinated!)
I find I do now have the top 2 books on your TOP 10 list and will definitely get to those, with thanks to you for your recommendations. (I have peeked at them, and I am fascinated!)
I see that you experienced the book as a choral requiem too, Roger!
And I love that quote from Bevins, it reveals his extraordinary acuity of perception of all that concerned the living world - which made his situation all the more tragic.
And I love that quote from Bevins, it reveals his extraordinary acuity of perception of all that concerned the living world - which made his situation all the more tragic.
I am not so much looking forward to reading/hearing it again, but I do look forward to discovering what new insights the repeat might provoke. R.
I've read Ulysses three times but always in a group or via audiobook. I am not sure I am up for rereading this one, but admire your perseverence.
Barbara, I was conscious of doing it an injustice the first time, so needed to go back. If you like audiobooks, this one would be a very good way to go. R.
As someone who admired this book a lot, Roger, I really enjoyed reading about your revisits, particularly the third one. I was aware of the tension in the various sections but your description of the three narrative arcs explains it all in a way that I will remember.
Thanks a lot, Fionnuala. From my Stage Three reading, I felt I could diagram the thing as easy as pie; there would be a series of arches of different sizes marching across the page. But putting that into words was a different matter entirely, so I appreciate your confirmation that it seems to work.
I've just begun Modern Gods by Nick Laird, and it's been an encouraging start. But why, I wonder, is everything I read now about Northern Ireland set in more or less the same place, within a few miles of Lough Neagh, to the west or north? R.
I've just begun Modern Gods by Nick Laird, and it's been an encouraging start. But why, I wonder, is everything I read now about Northern Ireland set in more or less the same place, within a few miles of Lough Neagh, to the west or north? R.
Two times! Wow! I have to admit that I feel like I will never grow up to appreciate the brilliance of this novel that you are talking about :(( It's like a book for grown-ups only - I really want to understand and like it but it seems to be so brilliant that I don't get it :D
It's puzzling at first, Irina; that was why I returned to it. BUT it was the only book in a long while for which we had unanimous praise in our little book club. R.
Roger wrote: "Barbara, I was conscious of doing it an injustice the first time, so needed to go back. If you like audiobooks, this one would be a very good way to go. R."
If it turns up in a sale, I may go for it.
If it turns up in a sale, I may go for it.
An excellent review of a masterful book. It is interesting how a book can evolve with a 2nd or 3rd reading, as in your case with Lincoln in the Bardo, especially if one is via an audio recording. Also, the mention of a the process of "translation" from novel to operatic format causes further speculation. If Melville's Billy Budd & Salman Rusdie's Shalimar the Clown can be rendered into operas, why not George Saunders's novel? Bill