What do you think?
Rate this book
250 pages, Paperback
First published August 2, 2017
*Spoilers*
The thing is I'm not one to jump on the bandwagon nor will I willingly subjugate my rights, just so I can appease the crowd. That is groupthink at its worst, a notion I shelf under mental slavery. No thank you.
I believe I'm old enough and sufficiently intelligent to know what is morally correct, particularly as it pertains to what I choose to do or read.
That said, for this particular subject matter, I believe the context and manner in which it was written is the reason it's controversial. I could reference several books that dealt with the matter of incest but I'll limit it to these two:
Flowers in the Attic
Forbidden
In no manner are these two different from The Wild, except, of course, in the intent and context. You see: Andrews and Suzuma respected the readers' intelligence, more than this, they built a world in which, contextually, the reader could understand the dissociative and heartbreaking situation that the characters had to endure. The ensuing incestuous relationships between the siblings weren't written for salaciousness; rather, it supported the central premise, amplifying the melancholic atmosphere.
Again, context.
Forgive me for dousing the already inflamed rhetoric but allow me to add another example:
Genesis 30 V 32-36. Lot and his daughters. The holy grail of incestuous relationships. Would we then condemn the Bible because of Lot and his daughters? Does that singular act negate its message and content?
Again, context and intent.
Which then brings me to Webster's- presumed- intent. Likewise the context. But before that let's examine the story of, Reed and Devon, our main characters.
Excuse me a minute while I laugh. Sweet dear lawd, I nearly died from laughing. Lets tag this #StupidPlotManipulationNumberOne.
It's not like there aren't 49 other states where they could have moved. No. It had to be in the WILDERNESS of Alaska otherwise the author wouldn't have the setting she needed in order to perpetuate her "taboo" romance story. Puhlease.
Moving on.
Guess who dies? #StupidPlotManipulationNumberTwo.
Did I mention there was, literally, thousands of acres? Can you understand why this book isn't even worth a tenth of the aggravation it caused? Sigh.
Again I ask. Why are we even giving this subpar story any attention? Are we seriously carrying pitchforks and unfriend buttons because of this? This?
Peace be upon you. Leave me be. I have no answers to give.
Dear sweet lawd. I can't even.
And, and, and, I can't even.
There are no words. 🙄🔫
A lot more transpires, so, if you don't mind being led and manipulated, then I suppose you might even enjoy this. As for me? It's a no, thank you.
“We grow up learning norms and behaviors that are deemed acceptable. Yet when all of life’s easiness is stripped from us and we’re thrust into something arduous, those norms get forgotten. They get shoved to the side as instinct guides the way. The mind is no longer needed. A useless organ. It’s the heart that grows wild. It forges the way. It makes decisions that defy reason and instead break rules that don’t exist out here.”