What do you think?
Rate this book
304 pages, Library Binding
First published March 12, 2013
The cracks in the dirt now yawned to proportions slutty with thirst...I had originally shelved this as 'horror' but am now removing it because while Scowler is horrific in parts, it has much more in common with realistic, gritty fiction that has a psychological underbelly.
There it was. A miracle, really, finding this speck of bone in a world of dust. There was a brown spot of blood on the tooth's root, and to Ry it seemed the encapsulation of the bum deal of life: a once-perfect thing plucked and bloodied and tossed to the dirt.
Daniel Kraus wrote the book Scowler with all intentions of scaring the reader. The book is supposed to shock and terrify people as they read about delusionary Ry and his murderous, vengeful father Marvin. The author uses demonic ideas of torture and abuse to give readers a chill or a thrill, depending on how they view the book. There is no educational value to this novel, for it is meant to be read for fun only. The story follows Ry and his family as they try to survive another encounter with their father, Marvin, who escapes jail when a meteor obliterates a wall of the prison. The subject of the story is survival in the face of madness, and it is told through the third person view of Ry. The book is aimed at teenagers, and it uses common swear words and phrases associated with modern teens, such as the f-word and other derogatory names. Young children would not understand some of the references, and older adults would probably be disgusted by some of the topics or ideas expressed throughout the novel. This goes to show again that this book was written to entertain teenagers by telling the horror story of Ry and Marvin.
The theme of the book is indirectly stated, but it can be identified as the idea of fighting madness with madness. Ry’s father, Marvin, was put in jail for sewing his wife to her bed, and he attempted to kill Ry after discovering that Ry was the one to free her. Ry survives by making three of his childhood toys real in his mind, and they guide him through a perilous escape in the woods. Marvin was put in jail, but he escapes after a freak accident involving a meteor sets him free. Marvin returns to his house with vengeance on his mind, and Ry must “resurrect” his three toy figures in his mind to survive his insane father once again. The author describes in detail Marvin’s lunacy, and throughout the novel readers watch as Ry becomes more and more crazy. The entire book is a testament to the old saying of “Sometimes you must fight fire with fire”, for Ry has to become crazy in order to save his family from the already crazed and homicidal father.
The book was written as a description, and the reader feels like they are experiencing all of the events first hand. Even when the story follows a “flash back” in Ry’s memory, it is told as if it was happening in present time. The style was effective and sometimes I really did feel like I was running through the dark forest of the Black Glade alongside Ry. The flashbacks helped to provide clarity in the story, and it showed more of the back story that readers are initially unaware of. The author’s style also includes a very descriptive style of writing, almost to the point of excess: “She would go blind that way, and Ry knew that was bad; also bad, though, was the unhappy notion that this flat, dull stretch of moribund farmland contained the realm of fascination that in all his years he’d been either unwilling or unable to notice. (Page 3)” The details are very good at painting a clear picture of the action, and the style is overall very effective for this novel.
In my opinion, I did not care for the book very much. The plot was so twisted and convoluted that sometimes I lost track of the story’s main focus. The whole idea of the meteorite was supposed to be a driving force in the story, but it lost track around halfway through. I was not sure where the novel was headed in the first half, and it lacks a clear focus on what the point of the novel is supposed to be. I liked some of the ideas that the author had in writing the novel, such as the visualization of childhood fantasies, but the execution of these ideas was poorly done, in my opinion. In addition, the amount of detail in the novel was appreciated, but some of the sentences were so wordy that it detracted from the overall feel of the story. It felt as if the author was trying a little too hard to put detail into the story, and it distracted me from the plot sometimes. The book is similar to another book titled Lockdown, for they are both horror stories that use graphic details in order to shock and terrify their readers.