Étienne Gilson
Born
in Paris, France
June 13, 1884
Died
September 19, 1978
Genre
Influences
The Spirit of Medieval Philosophy
by
27 editions
—
published
1932
—
|
|
|
God and Philosophy
28 editions
—
published
1941
—
|
|
|
The Unity of Philosophical Experience
26 editions
—
published
1937
—
|
|
|
The Christian Philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas
11 editions
—
published
1956
—
|
|
|
Methodical Realism: A Handbook for Beginning Realists
13 editions
—
published
1990
—
|
|
|
Being and Some Philosophers
36 editions
—
published
1949
—
|
|
|
Reason and Revelation in the Middle Ages
16 editions
—
published
1938
—
|
|
|
History of Christian Philosophy in the Middle Ages
36 editions
—
published
1922
—
|
|
|
Heloise and Abelard
27 editions
—
published
1938
—
|
|
|
Arts of the Beautiful
13 editions
—
published
1964
—
|
|
“God creates, not that there may be witnesses to render Him His due glory, but beings who shall rejoice in it as He rejoices in it Himself and who, participating in His being, participate at the same time in His beatitude. It is not therefore for Himself, but for us, that God seeks His glory; it is not to gain it, for He posses it already, nor to increase it, for already it is perfect, but to communicate it to us.”
―
―
“Modern man, brought up on Kantian idealism, regards nature as being no more than an outcome of the laws of the mind. Losing all their independence as divine works, things gravitate henceforth round human thought, whence their laws are derived. What wonder, after that, is if criticism had resulted in the virtual disappearance of all metaphysics? [...] As soon as the universe is reduced to the laws of mind, man, now become creator, has no longer any means of rising above himself. Legislator of a world to which his own mind has given birth, he is henceforth the prisoner of his own work, and he will never escape from it anymore. [...] if my thought is the condition of being, never by thought shall I be able to transcend the limits of my being and my capacity for the infinite will never be satisfied.”
―
―
“When man subverted order he did a great deal more than merely fall away from the rationality of his nature, diminish his own humanity, which is all that he does in Aristostle's ethics, nor he did merely compromise his destiny by an error, as it happens in the Plathonic myths; he brought disorder into the divine order, and presents the unhappy spectacle of a being in revolt against Being. [...] Every time a man sins he renews this act of revolt and prefers himself to God; in thus preferring himself, he separates himself from God; and in separating himself, he deprives himself of the sole end in which he can find beatitude and by that very fact condemns himself to misery.”
―
―