Rendező:
Otakar VávraOperatőr:
Václav HanušZeneszerző:
Jiří SrnkaSzereplők:
Zdeněk Štěpánek, Karel Höger, Jan Pivec, Vlasta Matulová, Ladislav Pešek, Gustav Hilmar, Vítězslav Vejražka, Václav Voska, Eduard Kohout, Bedřich Karen (több)Tartalmak(1)
1412 - 1415: Master John Hus denounces the vice plaguing the Church in his homilies in the Bethlehem Chapel. The Pope issues an interdict against Hus and requests him to defend his teaching at the Council of Constance. Yet he fails to persuade King Sigismund and is burned at the stake for heresy on July 6, 1415. Jan Hus is the first part of the Hussite trilogy, an epic film project that was strongly influenced by the ideologization of history of that time. The other parts of the trilogy are Jan Zizka and Against All. (Febiofest)
(több)Videók (2)
Recenziók (4)
The film is solid in terms of acting and direction, although it contains a considerable amount of pathos. But if there has to be pathos in any Czech film, it's in this one. However, what must be appreciated is the unabashed criticism of the church, which surprisingly didn't lose much. What Huss preached is still relevant in some cases. And this film is a fitting testament to that. ()
Hussitism in Czech cinema has always served merely as a backdrop for the politicized messages of its time. There remains a certain notion that Vávra's films are of good quality for their time, at least from a formal perspective. The great crowd scenes, costumes, and set design by Jiří Trnka contribute significantly. The individual characters are portrayed with theatrical shortcuts, yet despite everything, Jan Hus stands out as the best of the trilogy, perhaps because faith in truth has not yet died. ()
I finally joined the club and took Vávra’s legendary trilogy for a spin. When I take the era of production into consideration, I must admit that it resulted in a glorious experience. If only some of the scenes didn’t reek of the damn socialism (bordering on communism) but then again, maybe that was a must back then. All in all, Jan Hus is a brilliant epic film. Unlike nowadays, they weren’t afraid to shoot it and they shot it well. The set, the actors, the mass scenes, the script… nothing complicated and yet it came together perfectly. The movie didn’t teach me anything I wouldn’t already know from school, but Otakar Vávra managed to shoot such a gripping movie that he can proudly call himself the father of historical movies of Czechoslovakia. ()
Otakar Vávra was an experienced and reliable director, originally trained as an architect, and he had a sense of composition, which is evident in this film. He excelled in crowd scenes, and he also had the support of the leadership of Czechoslovak cinema, so no expense was spared on the production, and he had the best actors at his disposal. Indeed, the film perfectly reflects the nationalistic sentiments of the official ideological doctrine of the time. The anti-German sentiment is clearly evident. At the same time, excellent neorealist films were being made in Italy, and modern cinema was clearly heading in a different direction. Of course, this film doesn't have much in common with medieval Czech history. Nevertheless, it's a decent watch. Overall impression: 60%. ()
Hirdetés