Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Plants/Peer reviews

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject Plants
Flower, Common Perenial Gaillardia -Arizona Sun- Flipped - nekonomania
Scientific classification
Superdomain: Neomura
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom Plantae
Project information
Founded: 20 August 2004
Participants: Active Editors
View All
Shortcuts: WP:PLANTS
WP:Plants
Main page: WikiProject Plants
Project subpages
Tools
Departments
Resources
How can you help?
  WP:PLANTSSTS
See also

edit · changes

The peer review department conducts peer reviews of articles upon request. Its purpose is to encourage better articles by having contributors collaborate and provide ideas on further improvement. This can also be used for an in-project review before nominating an article for featured article status.

Active reviewers

[edit]

(Note: just sign the list to join, and don't forget to add this page to your watchlist.)

Requests

[edit]
  • Ficinia nodosa: I am making additions to this page for a university project and would like feedback on the additions I have made as well as future additions I could make. Thanks. --Nagware (talk) 04:25, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Leaf spot: The article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale. I have added more information to the sections since the upgrade from stub to C-Class and would like to request for a review/ revision of the class. Thankyou. --Savina Jo (talk) 03:42, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Inflorescence: It is listed as high importance and has changed so much recently, I'd like to get the most possible opinions because I'd like to see it B-rated (then possibly pass the GA nomination sooner or later) and because I had many doubts I'd like to solve when I chose to organise it that way. It would be very useful if I could get some opinions on the questions I put on the article's discussion. I'd like its accuracy to be checked by some experts, too (it was prised -private email- by a professional botanist from the SIUC, so I suppose it must have no major problems). So I request for an in-project peer review. Thank you Aelwyn 16:07, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Amaranthus tuberculatus: This is the first article I have written for wikipedia. I would like to know what I can do to improve it. Pruddle (talk) 07:58, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Amaranthus brownii: I'm getting ready to nominate this article as a good article and I would like some criticism. Please comment here. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 06:02, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please could someone comment on whether there are other aspects of this genus which should be included? I have not at present included any notes on cultivars as I am only familiar with ones available in the UK and as there are very few accurate descriptions by those who named the individual cultivars, there is much mis-labelling & mis-identifcation. Saxifraga (talk) 20:16, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Well, as for what to include in general, you may have seen it, but there is Wikipedia:WikiProject Plants/Template which includes topics which are nice to include. There's also Rodgersia in Flora of China, although the article already seems to have much of that information. Kingdon (talk) 22:52, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I'll check through that template & see whether I have anything useful to add.Saxifraga (talk) 20:51, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

stub?)

See also

[edit]