Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User's second archive of deleted articles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete all. JohnCD (talk) 09:35, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User's second archive of deleted articles

Orgazmik Europe: created 24 December 2011‎ (while AFD pending); deleted 10 January 2012; last edited by Erpert 24 December 2011; blanked by another user 26 June 2014‎
Elexis Monroe: created 1 December 2013‎ (while DRV open); originally deleted 10 May 2012, and several times susequently, deletion sustained twice at DRV; last edited by Erpert 4 December 2013
Melody Jordan: created 9 December 2013 (while AFD pending); deleted 10 December 2013; last edited by Erpert 10 December 2013
Magdalene St. Michaels: userfied by Erpert 7 January 2014‎ (while PROD pending); technically no deletion; last edited by Erpert 9 December 2013 (no edits upon or after userfication)
Sabrina Deep: created 26 August 2013‎ (while DRV pending); originally deleted 8 June 2011‎; last edited by Erpert 26 August 2013‎
Vanilla DeVille: userfied 4 May 2013‎; deleted 3 May 2013 last edited by Erpert 6 May 2013

Some time ago, Erpert was found to have improperly maintained an archive of deleted pages in his userspace. See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User's archive of deleted articles. They have now clearly resumed that practice; even worse, several of these pages are cut-and-paste copies, and therefore need to be deleted as copyvios/violation os CC-license attribution requirements. Per WP:UP, "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content." Deletion is particularly appropriate for already deleted BLPs with dodgy sourcing on sensitive subjects. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 20:38, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You clearly indicated that none of those articles have been touched since 2013, but then you said that I resumed the practice? I resumed it three years ago? I forgot they were even there, so none of this matters to me. Do you really have nothing better to do than follow me around? Leave me alone. Erpert ^{blah, blah, blah...} 02:37, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:34, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all that were deleted at AfD (per WP:UP#COPIES). All others, should be blanked at least during periods of inactivity. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:34, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. If the editor wishes to have a userified copy for work (not just to host), they can ask any administrator who will then restore all the edits and move the page. These are technically unattributed copies of mainspace pages. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 03:44, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - If the editor plans to work on them fine keep 'em but if they're just gonna sit here gathering dust then they may aswell be deleted .–Davey2010^Talk 11:31, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete allper WP:WEBHOST -- unnecessary copies of deleted content. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:39, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.