Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 September 30

< September 29	October 1 >

September 30

Several Jeffrey Dahmer files

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:09, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The use of multiple fair use images on this article fails WP:NFCC#3. Also in the article, but not nominated, are File:Jeffrey Dahmer Milwaukee Police 1991 mugshot.jpg (fair use) and File:Jeffrey Dahmer HS Yearbook.jpg (free image). I would have no objection if someone wanted to replace the remaining non-free image with a different non-free image at some point in the future, even one of the images nominated here. I considered adding the remaining non-free image to this nomination so it could be determined which one should be kept, but the likelihood of it becoming a no-consensus car crash made me decide against it. Macabre213 (talk) 09:13, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hatfield Coll Chapel.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy keep. Withdrawn — JJMC89 (T·C) 20:03, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid source. The provide source is indeed a CC-BY 2.0 licensed image of Hatfield College Chapel, however the image in the source link is a different image than the one uploaded. There needs to be a valid source to verify the license. Whpq (talk) 12:53, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Obviously a mistake. Here is the real source, found by Tineye, with which I've updated the file: Hatfield College, University of Durham. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 14:20, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw - now that a correct source has been found and the photo is verifiably freely licensed, this dicsussion can be closed. -- Whpq (talk) 15:39, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.