Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Inside Out (2015 film)/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:30, 5 August 2016 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of accolades received by Inside Out (2015 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): FrB.TG (talk) 20:51, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Another awards list of another fantastic film of 2015, which in my humble opinion, meets the FL criteria. FrB.TG (talk) 20:51, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments from AJona1992
- Any way of knowing Riley Andersen's age in the film?
- Is that really necessary? The list stating that she is young suffices, I think.
- Too many instances with the word film in the last paragraph.
- Are you supposed to wikilink an actor or actress and the film every time they were nominated in the article body? – jona ✉ 01:19, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Normally it borders on WP:OVERLINKING, but as the table is sortable all of the entries need to be wiki-linked. FrB.TG (talk) 10:14, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Comments have been addressed, I looked at other similar articles and have found it to be acceptable. The list is well-written, detailed and complete, the writing is superb, and well deserving of FL status. Best – jona ✉ 14:22, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks a lot. FrB.TG (talk) 14:35, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
I have been meaning to add comments for a while now, but it's just taken me some time to get here. After a quick read I believe the lead would really do well with some critical commentary, maybe just the RT consensus, as it reads a little bland and too factual. A single round up of the major aspects from any other reputed source could work too. Will add the rest of the comments in a short while.NumerounovedantTalk 08:42, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The lead is fine for an awards list, which can get repetitive as it only talks about awards it received. FrB.TG (talk) 11:50, 30 June 2016 (UTC) @Numerounovedant: do you have any concern? FrB.TG (talk) 12:12, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry for the delay... I've been busy lately, however, the list looks good. I will go through it one more time before giving a final say. NumerounovedantTalk 15:19, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The list looks in order to me, but, since I have not added much to the review so I think it's not a place where I should be giving a verdict. Good look with nomination though, good job. NumerounovedantTalk 10:54, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry for the delay... I've been busy lately, however, the list looks good. I will go through it one more time before giving a final say. NumerounovedantTalk 15:19, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from - Vivvt (Talk) 03:50, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
;Comments by Vivvt
- Vivvt (Talk) 09:27, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support All my comments have been resolved satisfactorily. - Vivvt (Talk) 03:50, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Much appreciated. FrB.TG (talk) 12:12, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support can't see any issue. Yashthepunisher (talk) 09:02, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, Yash! FrB.TG (talk) 11:27, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Strongly Support: Since i am the creator of List of accolades received by Inside Out (2015 film) and all the relevant information (which has been rewritten) that i had provided, i don't see any problem it being a FLC candidate. Nauriya (Rendezvous) 15:29, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments by Cowlibob
*Need refs for the cast and plot of the film
- Budget should be production budget
- We don't need to be that precise with box office figure to go to decimal points.
- Strange to start a paragraph with as of. How about moving the Rotten Tomatoes sentence to bookend the previous paragraph. I would also rephrase it as " Rotten Tomatoes, a review aggregator, surveyed x reviews and judged y percent to be positive."
- In the next sentence, "the voice of Poehler" sounds really odd. How about... "Poehler's voice performance received the most recognition from award groups."
- Annie Awards are mentioned twice in the lead.
America Cinema Editors Awards should be ACE Eddie Awards
*Many of the entries in the awarding bodies in the award column are redirects to the actual article. Please fix.
- @Cowlibob: on rechecking I think I got them all. FrB.TG (talk) 09:29, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
*Ref 56 needs language=Danish as well as the publisher being Danish Film Academy
- Ref 27 has a typo
This is a better ref for Bodil Award nomination [[2]].
Cowlibob (talk) 23:10, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks Cowlibob - I have acted upon your suggestions. FrB.TG (talk) 08:08, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Source review
- Formatting: No issues
- Spotchecks: checked refs 8, 26, 47, 71; all clear
- Completeness: Refs all seem appropriate
Source review passed; this nom is good to go once Cowlibob confirms that they're satisfied their concerns have been addressed. --PresN 19:00, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @PresN and FrB.TG: To confirm that the last comment has been resolved. Cowlibob (talk) 20:10, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Alright, passed. --PresN 20:17, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.